search for: normal_returner

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "normal_returner".

2010 Dec 08
0
[LLVMdev] Bad gcc versions
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:09:27 -0600 greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) wrote: > Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> writes: > > > What are we left with then? Only 4.2 and 4.3? > > On SLES 10.1 at least. I think it is highly platform dependent. Also keep in mind that llvm-gcc uses the 4.2 unwinder, so if you are seeing EH failures maybe the EH info generated by
2010 Dec 08
2
[LLVMdev] Bad gcc versions
Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> writes: > What are we left with then? Only 4.2 and 4.3? On SLES 10.1 at least. I think it is highly platform dependent. > I only use 4.4 since a while, and it works fairly well. On what platform? > Are you sure it is not a bug in the regression tests themselves > (strict-aliasing bugs, etc.)? No, I'm not sure. > Which
2010 Dec 09
2
[LLVMdev] Bad gcc versions
...Output (stderr): [x86_64-off-dbg]: -- [x86_64-off-dbg]: /ptmp/dag/llvm-project.official/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/args-rets-allocas-loads.ll:171:10: error: expected string not found in input [x86_64-off-dbg]: ; CHECK: Both ModRef: Ptr: double* %arg_a0 <-> %normal_ret_a0 = call double* @normal_returner() [x86_64-off-dbg]: ^ [x86_64-off-dbg]: <stdin>:122:2: note: scanning from here [x86_64-off-dbg]: ModRef: Ptr: double* %arg_a0 <-> %normal_ret_a0 = call double* @normal_returner() ; <double*> [#uses=1] [x86_64-off-dbg]: ^ [x86_64-off-dbg]: -- [x86_64-off-dbg]: [x86_64-...