Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "normal_returner".
2010 Dec 08
0
[LLVMdev] Bad gcc versions
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 12:09:27 -0600
greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) wrote:
> Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> writes:
>
> > What are we left with then? Only 4.2 and 4.3?
>
> On SLES 10.1 at least. I think it is highly platform dependent.
Also keep in mind that llvm-gcc uses the 4.2 unwinder, so if you are
seeing EH failures maybe the EH info generated by
2010 Dec 08
2
[LLVMdev] Bad gcc versions
Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com> writes:
> What are we left with then? Only 4.2 and 4.3?
On SLES 10.1 at least. I think it is highly platform dependent.
> I only use 4.4 since a while, and it works fairly well.
On what platform?
> Are you sure it is not a bug in the regression tests themselves
> (strict-aliasing bugs, etc.)?
No, I'm not sure.
> Which
2010 Dec 09
2
[LLVMdev] Bad gcc versions
...Output (stderr):
[x86_64-off-dbg]: --
[x86_64-off-dbg]: /ptmp/dag/llvm-project.official/llvm/trunk/test/Analysis/BasicAA/args-rets-allocas-loads.ll:171:10: error: expected string not found in input
[x86_64-off-dbg]: ; CHECK: Both ModRef: Ptr: double* %arg_a0 <-> %normal_ret_a0 = call double* @normal_returner()
[x86_64-off-dbg]: ^
[x86_64-off-dbg]: <stdin>:122:2: note: scanning from here
[x86_64-off-dbg]: ModRef: Ptr: double* %arg_a0 <-> %normal_ret_a0 = call double* @normal_returner() ; <double*> [#uses=1]
[x86_64-off-dbg]: ^
[x86_64-off-dbg]: --
[x86_64-off-dbg]:
[x86_64-...