search for: noqueues

Dear I need create second bridge xenbr1 for separate traffic between my virtual machine , I following this step but show message that Link veth0 is missing, how I can create veth0 ? When I run script for create xenbr1 ./network-bridge netdev=eth1 bridge=xenbr1 start Shwo this message Link veth0 is missing. This may be because you have reached the limit of the number of interfaces that the

Hey there, sorry to bug you, I've ran into a little problem conscerning a logcheck-rule I just wrote. I use logcheck and logcheck-database on Debian Etch. When logcheck reports me something I don't want it to, I normally write a rule to match that logentry and put it in a file called my_rules in /etc/logcheck/ignore.d.server/ ... that worked perfectly fine. Until that rule: Logcheck

Hello List, After demystifying the cause for my /sbin/ifup-local not being executed by network scripts for an Ethernet interface (don't let NetworkManager control it or ifup-local won't be executed)... ... I have a question with hopefully a simple answer: I placed an alias/description on my interface during testing and now I want to remove it. But when I try to remove it, I'm either

This is my system info: Debian Release: 10.5 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.4.60-1-pve (SMP w/16 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh

someone recommended that i should give br0 the same hardware address as eno2. I did that, and restarted the vm, and it still does not work. Here is my current host interface config: ip a 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000 link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo valid_lft

Hi, I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs 200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0. To save myself from configuring all VLANs on the KVM host, I'd like to hand the entire

I am trying to setup GRE between two CentOS 4.5 boxes. I have tried several variations of what''s listed below, but none of them work. box1: modprobe ip_gre ip link set gre0 up ip tunnel add gretun mode gre local 66.1.1.161 remote 66.1.2.161 ttl 20 dev eth0 ip addr add dev gretun 10.253.253.1 peer 10.253.253.2/24 ip link set dev gretun up ip route add 10.2.0.0/16 via 10.253.253.2 box2:

On Nov 2, 2015, at 2:40 PM, Mike - st257 <silvertip257 at gmail.com> wrote: > But when I try to remove it, I'm either trying to do something _actually_ > not supported or I don't have the proper syntax to accomplish what I want. It doesn?t look like ?ip link? has the syntax to remove an alias, but it can be done via sysfs: # ip link show dev lo 1: lo:

Hi, I am using linux kernle-2.6.15, iptables-1.4 and bridge-utils-1.4. Everything intslled without any issue and i am able to enable the bridge and traffic is also flowing without any issue. But i did not see any traffic on the iptables forward chain due to which i am not able to control the traffic. Do i requie enable anything more to make the traffic pass through iptables forward chain.

On 12/16/18 4:59 PM, Marc Haber wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to run a network firewall as a VM on a KVM host. There are > ~ 25 VLANs delivered to the KVM host on three dedicated links, no LACP > or other things. I have the VLANs 100-180 on the host's enp1s0, the VLANs > 200-280 on the host's enp2s0 and the VLANs 300-380 on the host's enp3s0. > > To save

My domains dont see any traffic until you try to connect out from within the domain. Tried this several times and it was consistent. I have no firewall either. running each domain on different cpu probably doesn''t help, although Im no network expert. Here is some info. ================ [root@a root]# xm info system : Linux host : a.b.com release

I have CentOS 7 host. Two guests on bridge network setup by GUI and virt-manager. 1 CentOS 8 guest 1 Win 10 guest Both cannot access the host. They can other machines on the network. Guests can access the internet just not the host. I used virt-manager GUi to set up everything. Selected the eth0:macvtap and Bridge. I "desire" bridge network. If I select something else I get access to

Hello Lartc Mailing List: Been working on something the last week and a half and ALMOST have it working.., just need a few pointers from the wizards on this mailing list to nail it. Ok, my setup is a hub and spoke arrangement, hub is Cisco 2821 with IOS 12.4. Spokes are ruggencom RX1000 routers, Debian based with the following versions installed: rx1000test:~# uname -a Linux rx1000test

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello! I have a problem with a duplicate route entry, when using a pre-installed route and automatic take-over by the "heartbeat" daemon, which adds an address and the kernel adds an route automatically. Maybe anyone has an explanation... > ip addr 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo

I just realized that I hadn''t actually asked a question when I posted this before. Let me try again... I am trying to configure a Linux box with all possible VLANs (4094 of them), and a subnet on each VLAN. Creating the VLANs isn''t a problem. But, when I try to use "ip addr add ..." commands to assign an IP address to each VLAN interface, I get to do about 280 of

Hi I am using Shorewall with a bridged Firewall using the "bridging utils" from Debian. eth0 is connected to the router and eth1 is connected to the local lan. eth0 and eth1 are both assigned zero addresses and br0 is assigned the Firewall server address of 192.168.0.1 I should point out that Shorewall is working fine in Bridge mode, but I have hit some problems while evaluating

Hi, this is propably bridge related and not really a xen problem, but it might help someone: Some of our domUs are not able to arp. Arp -n show (incomplete), and doing a tcpdump shows, that on the dom0''s eth0 the arp request goes out, the response comes in, but on the vifX.0 interface the arp response is gone. dom0# tcpdump -ni eth0 arp who-has 10.32.2.51 tell 10.32.7.70 arp reply

Hi All, Have a CentOS 7, dovecot and postfix setup. Can get mail via 995 SSL/TLS Can send mail to virtual users and auto creation works using /etc/dovecot/passwd file via mail command. Using the dovecot lmtp and can login via 465 but the user lookup fails via postfix. in postfix main.cf have virtual_transport = lmtp:unix:private/dovecot-lmtp in dovecot.log I am seeing no errors in

I am trying to get wireless working on CentOS 7.3 with intel wireless 3165 ip link 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP mode DEFAULT qlen 1000 link/ether b8:ae:ed:77:b3:3a brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff 3: wlan0:

I''ve just installed Xen on a new CentOS 5.1 system, and I can''t seem to make xenbr0 connect to the network. This system has a single physical network card. Apart from creating a few DomU guests, I have not changed any of the configuration. After running network-bridge, xenbr0 and friends are created, but the address and routing info is not moved. James # ip addr