Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "nopru".
Did you mean:
opru
2016 Sep 21
2
-sanitizer-coverage-prune-blocks=true and LibFuzzer
...r: 1 units: 64 exec/s: 476190
> #10000000 DONE cov: 252 bits: 923 indir: 12 units: 491 exec/s: 454545
> #10000000 DONE cov: 253 bits: 880 indir: 12 units: 471 exec/s: 384615
>
> Similar things happen with other binaries:
> for S in 1 2 3 4 5 6; do ./target-asan-8bit-nopru-build/fuzzer -seed=$S -runs=10000000 2>&1 | grep DONE & done
> #10000000 DONE cov: 103 bits: 190 indir: 1 units: 62 exec/s: 526315
> #10000000 DONE cov: 443 bits: 1730 indir: 12 units: 529 exec/s: 357142
> #10000000 DONE cov: 443 bits: 1695 indir: 12 uni...
2016 Sep 21
2
-sanitizer-coverage-prune-blocks=true and LibFuzzer
...s: 476190
>> #10000000 DONE cov: 252 bits: 923 indir: 12 units: 491 exec/s: 454545
>> #10000000 DONE cov: 253 bits: 880 indir: 12 units: 471 exec/s: 384615
>>
>> Similar things happen with other binaries:
>> for S in 1 2 3 4 5 6; do ./target-asan-8bit-nopru-build/fuzzer -seed=$S -runs=10000000 2>&1 | grep DONE & done
>> #10000000 DONE cov: 103 bits: 190 indir: 1 units: 62 exec/s: 526315
>> #10000000 DONE cov: 443 bits: 1730 indir: 12 units: 529 exec/s: 357142
>> #10000000 DONE cov: 443 bits: 1695 i...
2016 Sep 21
3
-sanitizer-coverage-prune-blocks=true and LibFuzzer
Hello,
Is this reproducible?
> Fuzzing is a probabilistic business and one or even two runs don't prove
> much.
>
I've reproduced the behavior on two different machines. Attached is a
script to do so. To use the script,
- create an empty folder and copy both prune-blocks.sh and
ff-http-parser.sh in there
- ensure clang and clang++ are in your $PATH
- cd /path/to/prune-blocks.sh