search for: noprivaci

Hi, I have downloaded Vorbis and played with it, and I have downloaded Speex but not yet played with it. My understanding is that Vorbis is targetted at high-quality audio (music) while Speex is targetted at speech quality audio (telephoney and such). So I have two questions to ask the group: 1. Which would your experiences show is the better codec for recording high quality speech such

Alright folks, here's the solution. 1) Keep extensions to 3 letters for audio & video. Except for special situations where the user might be doing a codec specific name. Since the official extensions are 3 letters, those can always be used on any 8.3 device. 2) introduce a new extension .OGV for ogg container video. With a strong preference for Xiph only codecs. (If you want 3rd

<noprivacy@earthlink.net> wrote: > Charles; > This is slightly off topic, but... > What kind of mail reader do you use? He uses: Sylpheed version 0.9.4claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) And you use: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 Perhaps Outlook doesn't like a Content-Type of multipart/signed? > Since this only shows up in various mailing

>Paul E Wrote [snip] >Windows 2000 (although it's the same for all of them) doesn't read in >any mime-type to correctly identify a file, it just uses the extension. [snip] What if, at least for Windows, someone wrote a simple application which when associated with .ogg files and an .ogg file was opened simply read enough of the ogg stream to identify the type of content and then

http://audio.ciara.us/test/index.html http://audio.ciara.us/test/128extension/results.html AAC, MPC, Vorbis, WMA 9/Pro, Lame & Blade were tested at 128k vbr. MP3Pro, AAC-Pro/Plus(?) and older versions of WMA were not tested. Looks like Vorbis tied with AAC, MPC and WMA 9/Pro for first. Although it was a four way tie, Vorbis was on the low end. And LAME was only slightly lower, comming in