search for: noperms

client: samba-client-4.7.4-0.fc27.x86_64 client: samba-client-4.6.5-0.fc26.x86_64 server: samba-4.7.3-3.fc27.x86_64 Reproduce steps: [chris at f27h ~]$ smbclient //f27s.local/scratch/ Enter SAMBA\chris's password: Try "help" to get a list of possible commands. smb: \> cd noperms smb: \noperms\> ls . D 0 Wed Jan 3 12:00:27 2018 .. D 0 Wed Jan 3 19:33:01 2018 test2 D 0 Wed Jan 3 11:59:55 2018 test3 D 0 We...

In a mailbox that has ACL restrictions on both DELETE and EXPUNGE (i.e. no 'e' or 't' rights), I see the following: 3 UID STORE 3173 (UNCHANGEDSINCE 353) +FLAGS \deleted 3 OK Store completed. (UID 3173 is not flagged \deleted) [...] 6 UID EXPUNGE 1:* 6 OK Expunge completed. (At least 1 UID is flagged \deleted in mailbox) Shouldn't these commands be returning

...6_64 > client: samba-client-4.6.5-0.fc26.x86_64 > server: samba-4.7.3-3.fc27.x86_64 > > Reproduce steps: > > [chris at f27h ~]$ smbclient //f27s.local/scratch/ > Enter SAMBA\chris's password: > Try "help" to get a list of possible commands. > smb: \> cd noperms > smb: \noperms\> ls > . D 0 Wed Jan 3 12:00:27 2018 > .. D 0 Wed Jan 3 19:33:01 2018 > test2 D 0 Wed Jan 3 11:59:55 2018 > test3...

...gpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote: > I would assume you would need to use 'rm -r' to remove a directory and > it's contents. That doesn't work and the man page doesn't list flags for any commands, plus it looks like rm is strictly for files not for directories. smb: \noperms\> rm -r test1 NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE listing \noperms\-r smb: \noperms\> rm test2 NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE listing \noperms\test2 >I would also assume a error message would be expected with > 'rmdir' if the dir was not empty. This is a problem for gvfs-smb backend for GNOME wh...

I need to mount a share I don't have direct access to only to one subdirectory. I have no problems mounting other shares on the same windows server with the same permissions. I can mount the volume through gnome "Connect to Server...", but I need it on the filesystem. What is working: smbmount //server1/share1 /mnt -o -fstype=cifs -noperm,credentials=/etc/auto.smb.server1 What is

It seems that even if -p (or -a, etc) are not used, permissions are still propagated from client to server, though not updated. I was a bit surprised since the option is "preserve permissions", and permissions were preserved on the initial copy even without -p. [ I am trying to rsync from Windows 7/Cygwin to (linux/unix). Windows 7/Cygwin is mapping ACL-style permissions (and I

Hi, i have a rather weird and also problematic use case. My NAS provides permissions but I don't know how. The share is mounted using unix extensions and I am seeing user IDs. However my /local/ filesystem refuses me to allow to do anything unless I am root or set the noperms flag (ostensibly). This means that locally write access is denied but not remotely. The local user is UID 1000. The logged in user is 1000002. The file *always* shows as rwxr-xr-x. Whether the file is remotely owned by 1000, 1026 or 1000002 doesn't make a difference. So: locally I am the...

On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:42:20 -0800 Peter Carlson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 1/29/24 13:08, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:51:37 -0800 > > Peter Carlson via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > >> Just did a quick test, the big T comes after setting permissions in > >>

...> I would assume you would need to use 'rm -r' to remove a directory and > > it's contents. > > That doesn't work and the man page doesn't list flags for any > commands, plus it looks like rm is strictly for files not for > directories. > > smb: \noperms\> rm -r test1 > NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE listing \noperms\-r > > smb: \noperms\> rm test2 > NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_FILE listing \noperms\test2 > > > >I would also assume a error message would be expected with > > 'rmdir' if the dir was not empty. > > T...

Hello, I have been doing a lot of research on this subject and I'm not finding a clear answer. My company currently makes a video capture and transcoding application that runs on a Linux server. The video application mounts shares from a second Linux storage server for various users at the same time. In other words, we have: A Linux Storage Server with many accounts (for example,

All, If the post "Samba 3.6 -> 4.1 change that prevent sharing / - mount error(13)" makes it to the list, I apologize, but it has been over a day and I have no indication that the post ever made it to the list. The issue is that in versions prior to 4.x, I was able to create a root share in samba, but now, something prevents it from being mounted. The relevant smb.conf is:

This patch exposes a generic interface which can be expanded in the future to implement USB for PVUSB, qemu, and stubdoms. It can also be extended to include other types of USB other than host USB (for example, tablets, mice, or keyboards). For each device removed or added, one of two protocols is available: * PVUSB * qemu (DEVICEMODEL) The caller can additionally specify "AUTO", in

Hallo, I've just tried kernel 3.4.6, self compiled, with the ".config" from kernel 3.3.7. Samba version 3.5.14 (slackware) When I run a script with (among many other lines) the command mount.cifs //$share/$src /path/to/$target \ -o noperm,sec=ntlmv2,$Loginparms (which runs without any problem under kernel 3.3.7) then I get an error message (some cifs problem), and the

I am trying to mount and access a Windows share, from one of our Active Directory servers to one of our RedHat Enterprise 4 Linux hosts. I have used Samba in the past to do the opposite, which worked very well. I was successful in mounting the share, using the following: mount -t smbfs -o username=<myid>,password=<mypassword> //<AD Server>/<Share> /mnt/app1

This patch series adds support for preservation of the VM generation ID buffer address in xenstore across save/restore and migrate, and also code to increment the value in all cases except for migration. Patch 1 modifies the guest ro and rw node creation to an open coding style and cleans up some extraneous node creation. Patch 2 modifies creation of the hvmloader key in xenstore and adds

Greetings all, I have a VERY basic fileserver in my network, that works well for my needs, and have run into a problem that I can't solve. I am sure that the more eperienced users here will be able to help me in less than 5 minutes, so please, if you have some time. My smb.conf [global] workgroup = msheimnetz server string = Samba Server Version %v netbios name =

All, I've run samba in standalone mode since the 2.0.7 days and have been though a few breakages due to version updates along the way. It seems we have hit one again in the 4.4 to 4.5 update. Specifically, the update was samba-4.4.5 => samba-4.5.0 There were no changes made to smb.conf, but the following attempted mount failed using: mount.cifs //phoinix/samba /mnt/phx -o

Hi everyone, Does anyone know whether it's possible to get Samba to skip doing its internal permission checks and instead rely on the OS for this? The reason I ask is that I have a single share called "web" which contains three folders. Each of these folders is a remote CIFS mount from another Samba server. The problem is that UNIX extensions are enabled for all of these mounts,

Hello, I have Samba set up on FreeBSD with a share for guests. I don't need or want any authentication for this share. [test2] path = /data/test2 read only = No create mask = 0777 guest ok = Yes The file permission on the host directory was set to 2777 and nobody:nobody. When a windows machine writes to the dir the permissions look fine. For example,

openSUSE v13.1 linux 3.11.10-11-desktop x86_64 samba 4.1.6 I recently upgraded an openSUSE server from v12.3 to v13.1. In the older version there was no problem about mounting a remote volume offered by an ancient OS/2 system. Now there is. Trying to mount it by command line: root:/home/sma-user3x> mount /t2 Retrying with upper case share name mount error(6): No such device or address