Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "nonvorbi".
Did you mean:
nonvorbis
2008 Aug 15
0
final changes to mimetypes rfc
...rbis streams, rather than hinting).
Actually, since libvorbisfile will happily play a Vorbis stream alonside a non
Vorbis stream, but won't (AFAIK) play the second Vorbis stream within a
stream composed of (Vorbis+Vorbis), the former is probably closer to the
".ogg" idea than (Vorbis+nonVorbis). This would depend on the number of
other implementations that may be better the other way (I'm not counting any
shipped-on-silicon implementations, since these would likely fail on both in
the first place).
2008 Aug 15
3
final changes to mimetypes rfc
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Ian Malone <ibmalone at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2008/8/15 Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com>:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The IETF has a final draft of our RFC at
>> ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/authors/rfc5334.txt (yes, it goes
>> from 3534 to 5334 - funny!).
>>
>> If you have anything in need of change,