search for: nontrivial

...about testing and R CMD check. In brief, the salient points that arose from the discussion are: [1] Because of the need for a nightly build of BioConductor, the tests (in the ./tests directory) of a package that run routinely as part of "R CMD check" must complete in five minutes. [2] Nontrivial regression testing of complex algorithms on real data can easily take longer than five minutes. [3] Maintaining and improving code that works on various kinds of "omics" data is greatly facilitated by the inclusion of nontrivial regression tests. Of course, points [1] and [3] are inco...

Is there any written description of what "non trivialness" is there? On Sun, Apr 29, 2018, 2:49 PM Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > One of the last big missing pieces for the new PM is enabling non-trivial > loop unswitch at O3. > > The pass is now working well and passing all the testing I have done as > well as some others'

One of the last big missing pieces for the new PM is enabling non-trivial loop unswitch at O3. The pass is now working well and passing all the testing I have done as well as some others' testing (thanks Fedor!) so it should be ready to be enabled. I've done preliminary benchmarking on the test suite and SPEC and haven't seen any interesting regressions and quite a few improvements.

http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1657 Summary: tests/functional/acl/nontrivial/zfs_acl_cp_001_pos causes panic Classification: Development Product: zfs-crypto Version: unspecified Platform: Other OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ot...

...beg for improvement: > 1. low information density of "conversation" view > > 2. inconvenient navigation/discovery of comments for multiple commits > in presence of force push > > As I see it, these two points will constantly get in the way of review > process for nontrivial > patch series (and somehow I believe that quality of review for > nontrivial patches will have the > biggest impact on the quality of the project itself). > > Do we have a good reason to believe that LLVM as a community has enough > weight > to nudge Github to really improve...

Hello! I''m quite new to Xen, and am wondering what is the best way to handle my XCP based server... Eg. video console for installation and maintenance, shutdown, restart, disk and memory config, etc. I read about openxenmanager, but it seems like an abandoned project, and seems extremely nontrivial to use under OSX. What about XenWebManager? I need to install that on the XCP server somehow, right? But what about console access to the virtual machines? Can this help me with that, over the web? Can someone point me in the right direction? Daniel _______________________________________________...

...uot;add %rax, 8" is "p = p + > 1" (64bit long), or "p = p + 2(32bit long)" > > So, I think your "It is not possible" is a bit too black and white. No, it's AI-hard, as evidenced that porting programs from 32-bit to 64-bit at the source-code level is nontrivial for large projects with lots of developers. And you only have less information at assembly level. -- Joshua Cranmer Thunderbird and DXR developer Source code archæologist

json::Value in JSON.h is a discriminated union. The storage is a char array of appropriate type and alignment. The storage holds one object at a time, it's initialized (and for nontrivial types, destroyed) at the right times to ensure this. The cast is only to the type of object that's already there, there's no magic here. On Fri, Aug 10, 2018, 17:52 Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> wrote: > On 08/10/2018 05:30 AM, Liu Hao wrote: > > Only an lvalue of a poi...

Hello Group, I am a PHP programmer eager to use Rails. I want to know weather there is any tutorials on how to use Dojo with Rails? I checked out d-rails Google Group, it was in mess! It gives me a impression that d-rails is dead. Is there there any good and possibly easy and reliable way to use Dojo in Rails? Regards A.K.Karthikeyan

...mcpy(NULL, _, 0) works as the user probably intends. Here's the thread I read about it: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-January/052066.html . As I recall, the tl;dr was "optimizing these assumptions to death doesn't realistically buy us much of anything, and there's a nontrivial amount of real-world code that depends on this behavior." On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:06 PM, John Regehr via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Also note that whereas GCC exploits the tricky definition of memcpy(), LLVM > at present doesn't appear to: > > htt...

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 5:19 PM David Greene <greened at obbligato.org> wrote: > Hubert Tong <hubert.reinterpretcast at gmail.com> writes: > > > It was already mentioned earlier in the thread that: > > - The individual commits cannot be approved in the sense of approving a > PR. > > Later conversation makes me wonder how often that really happens though.

Hi all, Is there are base function that I've missed that tests if an object is a vector in the dimensionality sense, rather than the data structure sense? i.e. something that checks is.null(dim(x)) ? is.vector() is trivially disqualified since it also checks for the presence of non-names attributes: x <- factor(c("a", "a", "b")) is.vector(x) #> [1] FALSE

...d using regapi. I have no SHAREDMEMLOCATION in ~/.wine/config ("grep SHAREDMEMLOCATION .wine/config" returns nothing). So it looks like regapi could fix .wine/config if I had it or I could figure out how to get it and run it. Or I could just edit .wine/config. Parsing the syntax appears nontrivial to me and I don't know what value to use. Could some tell me how to fix this. Thanks in advance for your help. Randy, PS. I also get a "Default Taskbar not found" that may be fixed just as easily. Don't know why I would care about a TaskBar.

Hi! It appeared to me that runFunction in JIT.cpp is slow for repeatedly executing the same function with nontrivial arguments since the "Stub" function in JiT.cpp:183 (LLVM 1.9) is compiled again and again. Is there something I can do to accelerate this? g

...e end > against: you'll have to re-engineer the LLVM IR object model and asm > writer in your language > against: it may be harder to track changes to the IR One more problem with this: in order to emit float constants you have to convert them to hexadecimal notation which I found nontrivial. My pet language is still lacking proper float support because of this. I'm not aware whether there are more pitfalls like this lurking around. (Time to finally move to the ocaml bindings.. :)) HTH, Jan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <...

...nice to have another attribute, maynotreturn (in C everything is mustreturn by default). In theory, if we had that, the C frontend could use it for potentially recursive calls, forcing the optimizer to either prove it's not recursive or consider it to have side effects. But if the function had nontrivial loops, the optimizer won't be able to remove the attribute. In practice, I think we just want to hide behind the standard with the old undefined behavior excuse and tell people who want infinite recursion to dereference a volatile. -Andy

...(CentOS). But I need to be sure that it can be made to do all that fancy hot-plug-auto-mount-sata-ahci stuff without too much hassle. Oh, btw, I am talking about hot-plugging using the sata cable --- usb connection of course already works, but this is a hard disk and speed increase is highly nontrivial when using sata connection compared to usb. Any suggestions? Thanks! :-) Marko

...icantly easier to implement. Architectures that separate pointers from integers are note becoming rarer. They are increasingly common in application-specific processors and likely to reappear in mainstream processors over the next 5-10 years. We have managed to get LLVM working (and building nontrivial amounts of code) on a MIPS-derived architecture that has non-integer pointers, and the representation in the IR itself is fine. We have a few hacks in optimisations that are far too coarse grained (i.e. don't do this optimisation if you're dealing with this kind of pointer, even though man...

On 12 March 2013 16:39, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > > This is not possible, except for specific cases. > > Consider this code: > > long foo(long *p) { > ++p; > return *p; > } > > The X86 machine code would do something like > > add %eax, 4 > > for `++p', but for x86_64 it would be > > add %rax, 8 > > But you

Hello folks. I'm very interested in improving LLVM's OCaml bindings. I have several nontrivial patches sitting on llvm-commits for several weeks, and so far there's been little interest in them. Could someone with a good understanding of OCaml please take a look at these? 1) http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1925 Every other function in OCaml bindings accepts context explicit...