search for: nontermpor

...metadata !{ i32 1 } Yes. > I would really rather not have to specify the entirely redundant !0. Just the > fact that the instruction has metadata with index/name "nontemporal" should > be enough. Why? These are uniqued anyway, it won't matter for performance and "!nontermporal !0" is not substantially worse than "!nontermporal". I'd rather keep the metadata model simple than optimize it for nullary metadata. -Chris

On Thursday 11 February 2010 16:31:16 Garrison Venn wrote: > I don't think the lang ref metadata grammar section > (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#metadata) has been fully updated with > how !dbg metadata is used in > http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html. At least to me it is not > clear. In my mind I translate the phrase "LLVM IR allows metadata to be >

I don't think the lang ref metadata grammar section (http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#metadata) has been fully updated with how !dbg metadata is used in http://llvm.org/docs/SourceLevelDebugging.html. At least to me it is not clear. In my mind I translate the phrase "LLVM IR allows metadata to be attached to instructions " into a grammar depicted in SourceLevelDebugging.html. I