Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "nonlocal_mentioned_p".
2010 May 18
3
[LLVMdev] selection dag speedups / llc speedups
...rogram arguments: llc.hg -asm-verbose=false -O0
32/403.gcc/403.gcc.linked.bc -o
32/403.gcc/output/403.gcc.linked.bc.llc_O0.s
1. Running pass 'Function Pass Manager' on module
'32/403.gcc/403.gcc.linked.bc'.
2. Running pass 'Live Interval Analysis' on function
'@nonlocal_mentioned_p'
- Jan
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk>wrote:
>
> On May 17, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Rafael Espindola wrote:
>
> >> The fast and local register allocators are meant to be used on
> unoptimized code, a 'Debug build'. Whil...
2010 May 18
0
[LLVMdev] selection dag speedups / llc speedups
On May 17, 2010, at 9:09 PM, Rafael Espindola wrote:
>> The fast and local register allocators are meant to be used on unoptimized code, a 'Debug build'. While they do work on optimized code, they do not give good results. Their primary goal is compile time, not code quality.
>
> Yes, we have a somewhat uncommon use case. It is fine to spend time
> optimizing bitcode (LTO
2010 May 18
2
[LLVMdev] selection dag speedups / llc speedups
> The fast and local register allocators are meant to be used on unoptimized code, a 'Debug build'. While they do work on optimized code, they do not give good results. Their primary goal is compile time, not code quality.
Yes, we have a somewhat uncommon use case. It is fine to spend time
optimizing bitcode (LTO is a OK), but we want to make the final IL ->
Executable translation
2007 Apr 30
0
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
...00014 __FUNCTION__.22282
> +00000540 l O .rodata 00000014 __FUNCTION__.22195
> 00003480 l F .text 00000095 overlapping_memrefs_p
> -00000554 l O .rodata 00000015 __FUNCTION__.22434
> +00000554 l O .rodata 00000015 __FUNCTION__.22347
> 00003700 l F .text ffffcac0 nonlocal_mentioned_p_1
> -00000569 l O .rodata 00000017 __FUNCTION__.22734
> +00000569 l O .rodata 00000017 __FUNCTION__.22647
> 00000580 l O .rodata 00000018 .str6
> 00003980 l F .text 0000009a nonlocal_mentioned_p
> 00003a20 l F .text ffffc7f8 nonlocal_referenced_p_1
> -000005...
2007 Apr 27
2
[LLVMdev] Boostrap Failure -- Expected Differences?
The saga continues.
I've been tracking the interface changes and merging them with
the refactoring work I'm doing. I got as far as building stage3
of llvm-gcc but the object files from stage2 and stage3 differ:
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs
(Are the above two ok?)
The list below is clearly bad. I think it's every object file in
the