Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "nonissue".
2010 Dec 22
3
XCP License issue
Dear All,
I am new for XCP, Recently, i installed the XCP and open xencenter in our
testbed. However, it has a message to notify me the license only have 30
days trial. Do anyone face this problem before?
How can i obtain the full version of XCP instead of using the trial version?
Best regards,
Besh
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
2004 Aug 06
3
final question: how many mountpoints can icecast handle ?
Hi everyone
I have one final question regarding my
diploma work. As it seems, the hardware performance
seems not to be the bottleneck when streaming out
ONE stream to x clients.
What happens when I use instead of ONE stream
different streams, because my concept is an on-demand
radio station that basically provides everyone with
access to a huge library of music files and lets him
create
2004 Aug 06
0
final question: how many mountpoints can icecast handle ?
...f icecast under these conditions revealed that 25-50
mount points is reasonable, but much more starts to get dicey. > 100 is
almost totally usuable.
This won't be as big of an issue in icecast2 since the locking was more
well thought out this time through. I hope to make the mountpoints a
nonissue, as the number of clients currently are.
25-50 should be enough for even hardcore use, and if you need more (as
we did. we were doing 450+ streams), it's easy enough to split them
over multiple icecast servers with each server handling 25-50 streams.
jack.
--- >8 ----
List archives: ht...
2005 Feb 17
0
TDM400 FXO not responding to inbound rings a fter 30ish days?
> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
If your install doesn't have to be 24/7, cron a reboot at 2 am. Since I did,
it's a nonissue for me.
2004 Aug 06
3
AW: final question: how many mountpoints can icecast handle ?
...that 25-50
> mount points is reasonable, but much more starts to get
> dicey. > 100 is
> almost totally usuable.
>
> This won't be as big of an issue in icecast2 since the
> locking was more
> well thought out this time through. I hope to make the mountpoints a
> nonissue, as the number of clients currently are.
>
> 25-50 should be enough for even hardcore use, and if you
> need more (as
> we did. we were doing 450+ streams), it's easy enough to split them
> over multiple icecast servers with each server handling 25-50 streams.
>
> jack...
2005 Sep 10
1
False Zap answer problem (Again)
I've been monitoring this problem for almost a month now. I realized that it
is more extensive than what I described previously. I can very easily
replicate this problem on every Zap channel. Following is the senario:
1. Call Zap/5 via say SIP/15 ->
Zap/5-1 created and starts to ring
2. Call Zap/5 via say SIP/21 ->
Zap/5-2 created and starts to ring
3. Hangup SIP/15 ->