search for: nonintuitive

How can we improve URL detection in Markdown? I posted a question on Stack Overflow and happened to click a URL in my post. To my surprise, it wasn't functional, and it took three different, nonintuitive manipulations before I achieved a functional URL. Stack Overflow says "not my problem", so I'm deferring to Markdown itself. Here's a sample<https://raw.github.com/gist/3909246/1885a4d509fb555c158208d9bfc319b9f8f95039/urls.md>Markdown document on Gist. All but the final hyp...

class Page < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :lists end class List < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :page end ######### controller code, inside action: list = List.find(params[:id]) old_page = list.page list.page = new_page # what is the value of old_page now? old_page now is the same as new_page! what the heck?!? The only thing i can think of is that old_page is

...arator is `.' not `,') - If the segment name does not start with `_', prefix it with `LC_SEGMENT.' For example, __TEXT,__text is renamed to .text and __TEXT,__unwind_info is renamed to __TEXT.__unwind_info. For that reason, specifying a section in command line options is rather nonintuitive: WRONG: objcopy --only-secton=__TEXT,__text a.out WRONG: objcopy --only-secton=__TEXT.__text a.out OK: objcopy --only-secton=.text a.out WRONG: objcopy --only-secton=__TEXT,__unwind_info a.out WRONG: objcopy --only-secton=.unwind_info a.out OK: objcopy --only-secton=__TEXT.__unwind_info a.out Fo...

The patch deals with the situation which guest OS uses unused page table pages as data pages and write data to them. The pages will still be grabbed by Xen as page table pages, and lots of unnecessary page faults occur. The patch will check if the data guest writes to the page table contains valid mfn or not, if not, we believe it is a data page now and then unshadow the page. The patch

...ere? What happens if the segment name (in the file) does not begin with a “_”? Thanks! MDT > > For example, __TEXT,__text is renamed to .text and > __TEXT,__unwind_info is renamed to __TEXT.__unwind_info. For that > reason, specifying a section in command line options is rather > nonintuitive: > > WRONG: objcopy --only-secton=__TEXT,__text a.out > WRONG: objcopy --only-secton=__TEXT.__text a.out > OK: objcopy --only-secton=.text a.out > > WRONG: objcopy --only-secton=__TEXT,__unwind_info a.out > WRONG: objcopy --only-secton=.unwind_info a.out > OK: objcopy --on...

...spondents and number of conversions 5) Confidence intervals about all of these figures I've taken a stab at developing my own type of display using R and grid, which you can see, along with comments and the raw data set, at http://r.loyaltymatrix.com. Unfortunately, my display feels clunky and nonintuitive. Any suggestions? Please feel free to comment or to share any ideas, either through e-mail or the commenting feature in the blog or on this list. As a subtext, I've looked into rmeta, which has a funnelplot function and a plot for the Mantel-Haenszel test, meta.MH. Neither is quite what I want...

...he named user, it sets the default permissions the file owner (default:user::rwx in Linux terms, CREATOR OWNER in Windows terms). If I then repeat the above steps, it sets the default permissions for the named user in addition to the default perms for the file owner. This works, but it's very nonintuitive, and it's probably not something that the average user would get. Am I'm misunderstanding something, or do I have something misconfigured, or is this possibly a bug in Samba? Josh Kelley

## Thomas rightly points out that list() is not the best structure for ## homogeneous data. My example was the simplest that generated the ## error of a matrix structure that that doesn't work. The application ## that this is simplified from needs lists because the data isn't ## homogeneous. I am attempting to write a missing value class, where ## each item is a list. In the simplest

...ly incorrect assumption again, could you please briefly > say how you expect that to be modelled and I can respond to that? Say for > example a simple M-wide, N-deep pipeline. > > Cheers, > > James > Hi James, I'll try to describe how the itinerary works a bit. It's nonintuitive. The itinerary has two lists, a list of pipeline stages and a list of operand latencies. The latency of an instruction is captured by the latency of its "definition" operands, so latency does not need to be modeled in the pipeline stages at all. A 2 wide, 1 deep pipeline (2x1) would be:...