search for: noninline

...it stays configurable, I am fine to change the default to ".data". > Is this necessary? Why not just put it in the normal data section? > Also "outline" jumptable seems like a strange term. Can you think of > something else? Yes, that is a tough one. How about "NonInline" instead. Robert > Thanks, > Evan > > Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 2, 2009, at 6:26 PM, robert muth <robert at muth.org> wrote: > > Hi: > > This is my first patch submission. Hopefully, this is the proper the > protocol. > Attached is a patch for the ll...

...:JumpTableDataSection. Why not just use that? > >> Is this necessary? Why not just put it in the normal data section? >> Also "outline" jumptable seems like a strange term. Can you think of >> something else? > > > Yes, that is a tough one. How about "NonInline" instead. Or "OutOfLine"? Please add a test case as well. Thanks, Evan > > Robert > >> Thanks, >> Evan >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> On Jun 2, 2009, at 6:26 PM, robert muth <robert at muth.org> wrote: >> >> Hi: >> >...

+cl::opt<std::string> FlagJumpTableSection("jumptable-section", + cl::init(".data.jtab")); + Is this necessary? Why not just put it in the normal data section? Also "outline" jumptable seems like a strange term. Can you think of something else? Thanks, Evan Sent from my iPhone On Jun 2, 2009, at 6:26 PM, robert

...f it does not work, >> >>> Is this necessary? Why not just put it in the normal data section? >>> Also "outline" jumptable seems like a strange term. Can you think of >>> something else? >> >> >> Yes, that is a tough one. How about "NonInline" instead. > > Or "OutOfLine"? That works for me. > Please add a test case as well. Thanks, I am not sure how to go about testing. I have a script that compiles a bunch of test programs (gnu c torture test, etc.) and then runs the executables on qemu. I run this script w...

...put it in the normal data > section? > >>>> Also "outline" jumptable seems like a strange term. Can you think > >>>> of > >>>> something else? > >>> > >>> > >>> Yes, that is a tough one. How about "NonInline" instead. > >> > >> Or "OutOfLine"? > > > > That works for me. > > > >> Please add a test case as well. Thanks, > > > > I am not sure how to go about testing. > > For this please just add a test case to the llvm dejagnu t...

...ot just put it in the normal data section? > >>>> Also "outline" jumptable seems like a strange term. Can you think > >>>> of > >>>> something else? > >>> > >>> > >>> Yes, that is a tough one. How about "NonInline" instead. > >> > >> Or "OutOfLine"? > > > > That works for me. > > > >> Please add a test case as well. Thanks, > > > > I am not sure how to go about testing. > > For this please just add a test case to the llvm dejagnu t...

...gt; Is this necessary? Why not just put it in the normal data section? >>>> Also "outline" jumptable seems like a strange term. Can you think >>>> of >>>> something else? >>> >>> >>> Yes, that is a tough one. How about "NonInline" instead. >> >> Or "OutOfLine"? > > That works for me. > >> Please add a test case as well. Thanks, > > I am not sure how to go about testing. For this please just add a test case to the llvm dejagnu tests. thanks, Evan > > I have a script...

Hi: This is my first patch submission. Hopefully, this is the proper the protocol. Attached is a patch for the llc ARM backend: Added mechanism to generate switch table in a data section rather than having it interleaved with the code. This is controlled by command line flags and off by default. Also, tried to document and improve the code where I modified it. Robert -------------- next part

...rmal data section? >> >>>> Also "outline" jumptable seems like a strange term. Can you think >> >>>> of >> >>>> something else? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Yes, that is a tough one. How about "NonInline" instead. >> >> >> >> Or "OutOfLine"? >> > >> > That works for me. >> > >> >> Please add a test case as well. Thanks, >> > >> > I am not sure how to go about testing. >> >> For this please ju...