search for: nonempti

I''ve got a Cuisine and a Restaurant model, with a habtm. One thing I want to do is find all the cuisines that have at least one restaurant associated with them. Right now I''m using the following SQL query: SELECT DISTINCT(cuisines.*) FROM cuisines, restaurants, cuisines_restaurants WHERE cuisines.id = cuisines_restaurants.cuisine_id AND restaurants.id =

Hello, Using older libguestfs 1.34.6-2 (from Ubuntu's standard package), I encountered this: libguestfs fails with an error, but the error code is "success": $ sudo guestmount -m /dev/sda1 --ro \ -o allow_others \ -a data.qcow2 \ /media/foo fuse: unknown option `allow_others' libguestfs: error: fuse_new:

Hi all, I am trying to mount on boot a sshfs filesystem. I have tried this in /etc/fstab backup at myserver.com:/home/backup/myserver /backup fuse.sshfs nonempty,allow_other 0 2 but only works when network works. I have also tried this in my crontab: @reboot sshfs -o idmap=backup myserver.com:/home/backup/myserver /backup but doesn?t seem to work either. What else can I try?

--- generator/utils.ml | 8 +++++++- generator/utils.mli | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/generator/utils.ml b/generator/utils.ml index b24ba8c..3a62084 100644 --- a/generator/utils.ml +++ b/generator/utils.ml @@ -360,4 +360,10 @@ let args_of_optargs optargs = | OInt64 n -> Int64 n | OString n -> String n | OStringList n ->

The rbind on empty and nonempty data frames behaves inconsistently. I am not sure if by design. In the first example, first row is deleted, which may or may not be on purpose: df1 <- data.frame() df2 <- data.frame(foo=c(1, 2), bar=c("a", "b")) rbind(df1, df2) foo bar 2 2 b Now if we continue: df1 <- data.frame(matrix(0, 0, 2)) names(df1) <- names(df2)

On 24/09/2020 12:47, Christian Naumer via samba wrote: > I am using it on Fedora with Volume Definition looking like this: and I use this: <volume fstype="cifs" ??????? server="CIFS_SERVER_FQDN" ??????? path="linprofiles" ??????? mountpoint="/mnt/%(USER)" options="username=%(USER),uid=%(USERUID),gid=%(USERGID),domain=%(DOMAIN_NAME)"

> No, Johannes is right: "undefined behavior" requires evaluation. Undefined behavior does not require evaluation. For example, undefined behavior occurs when "A nonempty source file does not end in a new-line character which is not immediately preceded by a backslash character or ends in a partial preprocessing token or comment." John

While doing research using the LLVM link time optimizer, we discovered a bug in the LTO plugin. After running the passes, the plugin tries to tell gold about 0 symbols produced from a bitcode file, indexing an empty vector in the expression &I->syms[0]. We're not completely sure if this is the best patch or if it is a symptom of a larger problem, but it worked for us. When we found

> setRefClass("Foo", fields = list()) Error in setRefClass("Foo", fields = list()) : A list argument for fields must have nonempty names for all the fields In my opinion, the above should not fail. There are no fields. Thanks, Michael [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi, In the article Hierachical token bucket theory says that "Just look at the self feed list and select the nonempty slot (one with a line) with lowest level and highest prio." Then I wonder that if the highest priority class is always in the "CAN SENT" mode, the other classes will have less opportuinity to send packet? Becase they have to wait the hightest priority class

On Fri, 25 Aug 2017 16:03:08 +0200 "Mgr. Peter Tuharsky via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Rowland, > > > I'm following this thread because I'm trying to use Linux member > server (Debian 9) and use Windows AD users in Linux (filesystem etc). > > It seems I have working Kerberos and to a degree, Winbind too, > because both > >

Hi, I am trying to run two Non-Gaussian regressions: logistic and probit. I am receiving two different errors when I try to run these regressions and I am not sure what they mean or how to fix my syntax. Here is the logistic regression error: Error in family$linkfun(mustart) : Argument mu must be a nonempty numeric vector Here is the probit regression error: Error in pmax(eta, -thresh) :

Commit-ID: 1285f79afbd9686c78c7815203ecbf3e87a81ff8 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/?p=libs/klibc/klibc.git;a=commit;h=1285f79afbd9686c78c7815203ecbf3e87a81ff8 Author: Herbert Xu <herbert at gondor.apana.org.au> AuthorDate: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 14:27:16 +0800 Committer: Ben Hutchings <ben at decadent.org.uk> CommitDate: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 21:42:55 +0000 [klibc] dash: expand: Fix

Note though that this has been put on hold on stats.stackexchange.com as off-topic. On 23/06/2017 19:33, Bert Gunter wrote: > Probably the wrong list. R-help is concerned with R programming, not > statistics methodology questions, although the intersection can be > nonempty. > > I suggest you post on stats.stackexchange.com instead, which *is* > concerned with statistics

Probably the wrong list. R-help is concerned with R programming, not statistics methodology questions, although the intersection can be nonempty. I suggest you post on stats.stackexchange.com instead, which *is* concerned with statistics methodology questions. Cheers, Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into

Hello, I have a dataset with proportions that vary around a fixed mean, is it possible to use betareg to look at variance in the dispersion parameter while keeping the mean fixed? I am very new to R but have tried the following: svec<-c(qlogis(mean(data1$scaled)),0,0,0) f<-betareg(scaled~-1 | expt_label + grouped_hpi, data=data1, link.phi="log",

On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:26:11 +0000 "A. James Lewis" <james at fsck.co.uk> wrote: > Well, network connectivity to the other DC would probably also be > required... and I don't have that currently... so there's the first > hurdle... but thanks for confirming that there's no other > configuration required. > > I'm slightly surprised that the

The following changes since commit 81ad566f155fac31089fde69c87059b217e7e9b6: NEWS: Update for 6.03 release (2014-10-06 09:27:44 -0700) are available in the git repository at: https://github.com/wferi/syslinux/ pub for you to fetch changes up to 68cb978ab7e692d772e4d62d3585b8f7bac43b4b: lua: simplify the function/value handling in the automenu test (2014-10-13 12:44:15 +0200)

What is the best way to change my R code to be able to compare the pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) with the Chi square method? Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone > Op 24 jun. 2017 om 14:18 heeft Michael Dewey <lists at dewey.myzen.co.uk> het volgende geschreven: > > Note though that this has been put on hold on stats.stackexchange.com as off-topic. > >>

Jorge: FYI, *generally speaking,* queries that are mostly statistical in nature, such as yours, are off topic here -- this list is about R programming help, not statistical help. Having said that, you still may get a useful response here -- the r-help/statistics intersection *is* nonempty. However, if not, 2.5 suggestions: 1. Try posting to r-sig-mixed-models instead. Repeated measures are a