Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "nonblcoking".
2004 Aug 06
3
Icecast2?
On 19/02/02 03:06, Jack Moffitt shaped the electrons to say:
> > The point is, is this list related to icecast2 development? I made some
> > changes to the server and sent a patch to Jack Moffitt, but I'm not sure
> > he's still mainaining the server.
>
> You're in the right place, and I still maintain the server. I don't
> remember your patch right
2004 Aug 06
0
Icecast2?
...bly get incorporated.
As for the other parts, I do not understand why we shouldn't kick
clients who fall 25 packets behind. That is more than 100k usually, and
surely you don't think we should buffer them forever.
<p>Also, I have not seen any problems with disconnections because of
nonblcoking socket failures. They are determined to be recoverable
(EAGAIN, etc) or not recoverable. on recoverable errors we just resend.
On non recoverable errors we can do nothing but remove the client.
I have not yet looked at the patch, so maybe it's correct, but from your
description I am doubtful...