Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "nomicon".
2019 Jul 17
0
Re: [PATCH] Rust bindings: Add Rust bindings
...they can be optimized
out. Also #[repr(C)] it.
You should rather have a struct with an empty member:
struct guestfs_handle {
_unused: [u32; 0],
}
I'll try to find the official info in rust docs, I just do not know on which
docs page it was.
/me goes looking
Oh yeah, it was in the nomicon:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/ffi.html#representing-opaque-structs
It will be even nicer when RFC 1861 gets stabilized, but that's long long in the
future, I guess:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43467
Otherwise it looks very similar to what I started, so that should be g...
2019 Jul 17
2
[PATCH] Rust bindings: Add Rust bindings
From: Hiroyuki_Katsura <hiroyuki.katsura.0513@gmail.com>
Rust bindings: Add create / close functions
Rust bindings: Add 4 bindings tests
Rust bindings: Add generator of structs
Rust bindings: Add generator of structs for optional arguments
Rust bindings: Add generator of function signatures
Rust bindings: Complete actions
Rust bindings: Fix memory management
Rust bindings: Add
2019 Jul 20
2
Re: [PATCH] Rust bindings: Add Rust bindings
...ould rather have a struct with an empty member:
>
> struct guestfs_handle {
> _unused: [u32; 0],
> }
>
> I'll try to find the official info in rust docs, I just do not know on
> which
> docs page it was.
>
> /me goes looking
>
> Oh yeah, it was in the nomicon:
>
> https://doc.rust-lang.org/nomicon/ffi.html#representing-opaque-structs
>
> It will be even nicer when RFC 1861 gets stabilized, but that's long long
> in the
> future, I guess:
>
> https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43467
>
> Otherwise it looks very...