search for: nomenclatures

Hello I wonder what the commonly used nomenclature is within the field of emulators for a) The software that constitutes the emulator itself b) The software that runs on top of the emulator I hoped to find a single noun, so I don't have to use the rather long sentences as above everywhere I want to refer to one of the two softwares. Greetings Flo

< Does anyone know why they're called random deviates, as opposed to random numbers?> Others will probably give you some technical reason about random numbers can be considered as random deviates from a mean (I think at least the 1875 Galton paper at http://www.mugu.com/galton/ uses similar terminology (I'm not claiming this is the earliest use - just the easiest to access at the

What would you call elements of the form: xyz:$abc -- variables seems to be the name in the tablegen code ??? They are not mentioned in the tablegen users guide but of course used heavily. xyx must be a def and exist? Thanks. Reed

On 07/26/2016 06:23 PM, Liang Li wrote: > + for_each_migratetype_order(order, t) { > + list_for_each(curr, &zone->free_area[order].free_list[t]) { > + pfn = page_to_pfn(list_entry(curr, struct page, lru)); > + if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) { > + page_num = 1UL << order; > + if (pfn + page_num > end_pfn) > + page_num =

On 07/26/2016 06:23 PM, Liang Li wrote: > + for_each_migratetype_order(order, t) { > + list_for_each(curr, &zone->free_area[order].free_list[t]) { > + pfn = page_to_pfn(list_entry(curr, struct page, lru)); > + if (pfn >= start_pfn && pfn <= end_pfn) { > + page_num = 1UL << order; > + if (pfn + page_num > end_pfn) > + page_num =

Hi, I am executing a C program using JIT. When the program exits, the control comes back to my program which initiates the JIT. Now, I want to read the value(not the LLVM nomenclature) of a global variable (not the LLVM nomenclature). I am able to get the global variable, using the following command: GlobalVariable *my_global = Mod->getNamedGlobal("MY_GLOBAL"); I want to know the

Hello, I computed acf() and have an array as output. now I would like to have only one matrix or data frame (not yet familiar with the nomenclature) extracted from this array. or even only the first row of each matrix. the first part of my data "test" is called $acf ,1 , , 1 , , 2 1, , ... ... 2, , .. ... I tried several names but nothing wants to work, I only

Hello, I'd like to know the format a function's name must conform to. Can I be pointed to LLVM documention that specifies the nomenclature for functions and other Identifiers as well (%registers, ModuleID etc.) ? Thanks, Sanjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's any difference. Are those 3 line the same? WITH_KMS=YES WITH_KMS="YES" WITH_KMS=yes Best regards Zoran

On 5/8/2024 7:53 AM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 2:32?PM Easwar Hariharan > <eahariha at linux.microsoft.com> wrote: >> >> On 5/3/2024 11:13 AM, Easwar Hariharan wrote: >>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" >>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's

Thank You Chen ! On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:21 PM 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > Perhaps you can refer to [1]. Function name should be a global one. > > [1] http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#identifiers > > HTH, > chenwj > > > 2017-06-22 16:35 GMT+08:00 SANJAY SRIVALLABH SINGAPURAM via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > >>

Hi, I am new to LLVM mailing list! Am I right in adding [LLVMdev] to the subject? Or is it for some other purpose, I just saw that everyone does that. Here is my problem. I am running my program using JIT. Once the program execution is complete, the control goes back to the program which initiated the JIT. I want to know the value of one of the global variables in my program. Since the variable

Hi all, I have decided to adopt the following nomenclature going forward. I think it's a reasonable compromise between 14 years of history and the needs going forward, and IMO looks better than using all caps everywhere: - The project itself is the Syslinux Project. - It's primary product is Syslinux, a collection of bootloaders. - The main components of Syslinux are: - SYSLINUX,

Seriously, I just have to ask this question. Why mark via the subject line a message as "OFF LIST" and then send it via the normal list framework. Doing so only insures that the message is actually "ON LIST" irregardless of what nomenclature is used in the subject line. If a message is truly supposed to be "OFF LIST", then why not send it directly to its intended

Using stock OpenSSH 4.7 I found different behavior when trying to specify the use of the 'none' cipher depending on the command line option nomenclature. This is under linux 2.6.19-web100 using -ocipher=none [root at delta openssh-4.7p1-hpnv19]# /home/rapier/ssh47/bin/scp -S /home/rapier/ssh47/bin/ssh -ocipher=none -P 2222 ~rapier/2gb rapier at localhost:/dev/null rapier at

Hello- with alpha20 I'm getting the "ADS support not compiled in" error when trying to do 'net ads join'. I double checked everything before doing the make. I'm no hacker, but i sniffed around in the code and discovered that configure is putting '#define WITH_ADS 1' into includes/config.h and all the .c files are doing '#ifdef HAVE_ADS'. So i guess

Raphael, Except for the : instead of the , this looks like the grub hard disk nomenclature that's been around for a thousand years. Certainly since early GRUB1. Example: (hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz Why did you chose : instead of grub's , ? I'm guessing (like grub) that disks & partitions are 0-based? (Were the original grub authors European?) Spike #Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014

On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 2:32?PM Easwar Hariharan <eahariha at linux.microsoft.com> wrote: > > On 5/3/2024 11:13 AM, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > > I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave" > > with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's > > series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for

On Dec 15, 2009, at 6:26 PM, David Greene wrote: > On Tuesday 15 December 2009 19:52, Jim Grosbach wrote: > >> Do you have specific examples in mind that would be expressible with >> something more complicated that aren't handleable via an early- >> clobber >> constraint? > > Not offhand, no. I'm mostly concerned about the readability of .td >

...more difficult, generally speaking. One important matter to consider is the syntax (i.e. users). A future discussion / email would sound something as "we already introduced a certain syntax for 'hd' and 'partitions', so now we are having troubles with supporting additional nomenclatures". Examples are: using space character(s) as alternative to the suggested comma (as chain.c32), or using labels and/or UUIDs (as chain.c32). Once a certain syntax is established for final users, improvements are more difficult if they are not considered in advance. I understand the desire...