search for: nolease

Thanks again, unfortunately it still fails when mounting the drive on a windows machine (even using nolease) on our end. We will prepare a fully reproducible example using a virtual machine. This could take us a day or two. ++ On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 11:05, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 10:35, Alexandre Courtiol > <alexandre.courtiol at gmail.com&...

...now (on our side at least) Many thanks, for having another look at this knot. Best, Alex On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 at 10:50, Alexandre Courtiol < alexandre.courtiol at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks again, unfortunately it still fails when mounting the drive on a > windows machine (even using nolease) on our end. > We will prepare a fully reproducible example using a virtual machine. This > could take us a day or two. > ++ > > On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 11:05, I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 10:35, Alexandre Courtiol >>...

...e installation step by step, and I checked that, when the >> mv command is invoked, manually running mv in the console does trigger >> the error too. So again, I don't think there's any issue with R. >> >> However, I've also managed to fix the issue by adding the nolease >> option to the mount command. Hope it helps. >> >> I?aki >> >> > >> > Issue aside, may I ask what is the purpose of putting the library in a >> > smb share? May I suggest [1]? >> > >> > [1] https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/f...

...bian R binaries. Then I executed the installation step by step, and I checked that, when the mv command is invoked, manually running mv in the console does trigger the error too. So again, I don't think there's any issue with R. However, I've also managed to fix the issue by adding the nolease option to the mount command. Hope it helps. I?aki > > Issue aside, may I ask what is the purpose of putting the library in a > smb share? May I suggest [1]? > > [1] https://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/fedora/#additional-packages > > I?aki > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2023 at 16:...

flight 13383 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13383/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 16 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 13379 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 12