Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "nofp".
Did you mean:
nfp
2019 Apr 10
2
[RFC] New Clang target selection options for ARM/AArch64
...t.o
$ ./arm-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-a -mfpu=auto -c /tmp/test.c -o /tmp/test.o
$ ./arm-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-a+dotprod -c /tmp/test.c -o /tmp/test.o
arm-eabi-gcc: error: 'armv8-a' does not support feature 'dotprod'
arm-eabi-gcc: note: valid feature names are: crc simd crypto nocrypto nofp
$ ./arm-eabi-gcc -march=armv7-m -mfpu=neon-fp16 -c /tmp/test.c -o /tmp/test.o
(same example given for Clang above, should be invalid)
Clang AArch64
=============
The '+' syntax still applies but mfpu is replaced with '+' extensions.
$ ./clang --target=aarch64-arm-none-eabi -marc...
2019 Apr 16
2
[RFC] New Clang target selection options for ARM/AArch64
...t.o
$ ./arm-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-a -mfpu=auto -c /tmp/test.c -o /tmp/test.o
$ ./arm-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-a+dotprod -c /tmp/test.c -o /tmp/test.o
arm-eabi-gcc: error: 'armv8-a' does not support feature 'dotprod'
arm-eabi-gcc: note: valid feature names are: crc simd crypto nocrypto nofp
$ ./arm-eabi-gcc -march=armv7-m -mfpu=neon-fp16 -c /tmp/test.c -o /tmp/test.o
(same example given for Clang above, should be invalid)
Clang AArch64
=============
The '+' syntax still applies but mfpu is replaced with '+' extensions.
$ ./clang --target=aarch64-arm-none-eabi -marc...
2018 Sep 21
5
[RFC] New Clang target selection options for ARM/AArch64
...t.o
$ ./arm-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-a -mfpu=auto -c /tmp/test.c -o /tmp/test.o
$ ./arm-eabi-gcc -march=armv8-a+dotprod -c /tmp/test.c -o /tmp/test.o
arm-eabi-gcc: error: 'armv8-a' does not support feature 'dotprod'
arm-eabi-gcc: note: valid feature names are: crc simd crypto nocrypto nofp
$ ./arm-eabi-gcc -march=armv7-m -mfpu=neon-fp16 -c /tmp/test.c -o /tmp/test.o
(same example given for Clang above, should be invalid)
Clang AArch64
=============
The '+' syntax still applies but mfpu is replaced with '+' extensions.
$ ./clang --target=aarch64-arm-none-eabi -marc...
2010 Jun 04
2
OGGZ Seeking in Theora
Dear all
I'm aware that there have been several discussions about the seeking
issue and I'm sorry to bring this up again.
To solve the problem with Inter-Frame garbage, a seek to the previous
keyframe has to be made. The keyframe number should be extracted from
the granulepos of the frame where we want to seek to. I hope I
understood the theory - unfortunately a few questions have