Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "noehtable".
Did you mean:
ehtable
2014 Mar 21
2
[LLVMdev] Unwind, exception handling, debuggers and profilers
...wtable and nounwind. Those were made with the
x86_64's ABI in mind, and have only interoperated seriously with
DwarfCFIException until very recently.
There has to be a way to disable unwind tables, so either the "no
attribute" behaviour above is wrong or we need a new attribute
"noehtable".
There has to be a way to emit CantUnwind, so if the behaviour above is
right, the "uwtables" attribute is only related to forced unwind
(debug, profiler), not exception handling.
There has to be a way to map "throw()" into IR, and "nounwind" seems
to be the on...
2014 Mar 20
2
[LLVMdev] Unwind, exception handling, debuggers and profilers
On 20 March 2014 02:09, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is just 2. It uses .eh_frame for unwinding proper. The
> only difference in .eh_frame is that there is a personality function
> defined.
If there is no debug information, it should still be possible to
unwind the stack via the saved LR on the stack, no?
If there is only line info, you