search for: nodesplitting

...% MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl -3.52% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake -2.96% MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl -2.75% MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer -2.70% MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl -1.95% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops -1.89% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft -1.71% MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign -1.16% External/SPEC/CFP2006/447_dealII/447_dealII -1.06% — Regressions — MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bh/bh 22.47% MultiSource/Benchma...

...arks/TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl -3.52% > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake -2.96% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl -2.75% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer -2.70% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl -1.95% > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops -1.89% > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft -1.71% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign -1.16% > External/SPEC/CFP2006/447_dealII/447_dealII -1.06% > > — Regressions — > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olde...

...h/beamformer/beamformer -2.79% 0.8845 0.8598 0.0026 SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake -2.79% 1.8517 1.8001 0.0014 External/SPEC/CFP2000/177_mesa/177_mesa -2.15% 1.7214 1.6844 0.0017 SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench -2.05% 0.7280 0.7131 0.0049 MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl -1.96% 3.1494 3.0878 0.0034 SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft -1.70% 3.4625 3.4035 0.0009 SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops -1.31% 7.0775 6.9845 0.0014 MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod -1.12% 4.5972 4.5455 0.0050 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML a...

...rolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl -3.52% >> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake -2.96% >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl -2.75% >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer -2.70% >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl -1.95% >> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops -1.89% >> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft -1.71% >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign -1.16% >> External/SPEC/CFP2006/447_dealII/447_dealII -1.06% >> >> — Regressions — >>...

...ultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/StatementReordering-flt/StatementReordering-flt 6.77% MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/CrossingThresholds-flt/CrossingThresholds-flt 2.65% SingleSource/UnitTests/Vectorizer/gcc-loops 2.63% Performance Improvements - Execution Time  (ISL over Cloog) MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt -6.77% MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk -3.03% However, ISL outperforms Cloog in compile-time performance.  With ISL code generator, 22 benchmarks have >10% compile-time performance improvement over Cloog. Top 10 improvements are shown as follows: Performanc...

...Rerolling-dbl -3.52% >>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake -2.96% >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl -2.75% >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer -2.70% >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl -1.95% >>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops -1.89% >>> SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft -1.71% >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign -1.16% >>> External/SPEC/CFP2006/447_dealII/447_dealII -1.06% >>> >>> —...

...TSVC/LoopRerolling-dbl/LoopRerolling-dbl -3.52% > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake -2.96% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LinearDependence-dbl/LinearDependence-dbl > -2.75% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/beamformer/beamformer -2.70% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl -1.95% > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops -1.89% > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft -1.71% > MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign -1.16% > External/SPEC/CFP2006/447_dealII/447_dealII -1.06% > > — Regressions — > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/...

...amformer/beamformer-2.79%0.88450.8598 > 0.0026SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake-2.79%1.85171.8001 > 0.0014External/SPEC/CFP2000/177_mesa/177_mesa-2.15%1.72141.68440.0017 > SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench-2.05%0.72800.71310.0049 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl-1.96% > 3.14943.08780.0034SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft-1.70%3.46253.4035 > 0.0009SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-1.31%7.07756.98450.0014 > MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod-1.12%4.59724.54550.0050 > > > ____________________________________...

Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".

Running on an Alpha machine which reports (uname -a) OSF1 bsdx01.bs.ehu.es V4.0 878 alpha and using the binary distribution put together by Albrecht Gebhardt (in http://cran.at.r-project.org/bin/osf/osf4.0/tar/alpha_ev5/) I obtain core dumps whenever I try to use package rpart. I have R REMOVE'd the rpart package, downloaded the source rpart_1.0-7.tar from CRAN and

tl;dr in low data situations we don’t look at past information, and that increases the false positive regression rate. We should look at the possibly incorrect recent past runs to fix that. Motivation: LNT’s current regression detection system has false positive rate that is too high to make it useful. With test suites as large as the llvm “test-suite” a single report will show hundreds of

...cumulative (1.85% - 106.56s this program) nts.MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASC_Sequoia/AMGmk/AMGmk.exec > 8. 31.60% cumulative (1.49% - 86.00s this program) nts.SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench.exec > 9. 32.75% cumulative (1.15% - 66.37s this program) nts.MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl.exec > 10. 33.90% cumulative (1.15% - 66.13s this program) nts.MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon.exec > 11. 35.04% cumulative (1.14% - 65.98s this program) nts.SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/syr2k/syr2k.exec > 12. 36.14% cumulative (...

...634 -12.302334337349 Benchmarks/McCat/03-testtrie/testtrie 0.0092 0.0081 -11.956521739130 Applications/treecc/treecc 0.0009 0.0008 -11.111111111111 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl 0.0009 0.0008 -11.111111111111 Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplit 2.3019 2.0529 -10.817151049133 Benchmarks/MiBench/network-patricia/network 0.0647 0.0581 -10.200927357032 Benchmarks/McCat/09-vor/vor 0.0816 0.0735 -9.9264705882353 Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs 0.029 0.0262 -9...

Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only

...95255|2.998408679| -0.13| 4745295258| 0|2.986642419| 0.27| 4745295256| 0| |MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/LoopRestructuring-flt/LoopRestructuring-flt.test | 40|2.402549805| 4419860245| 2.3960923| 0.27| 4419860251| 0|2.403938844| -0.06| 4419860252| 0| |MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-dbl/NodeSplitting-dbl.test | 40|2.308084263|18642442940| 2.30841202| -0.01|18642442945| 0|2.308712261| -0.03|18642442944| 0| |MultiSource/Benchmarks/TSVC/NodeSplitting-flt/NodeSplitting-flt.test | 40|1.767745677|16921992007|1.767578024| 0.01|16921992009| 0|1.765...