search for: nodeps

...86.rpm": libncurses.so.4 is needed by samba-2.2.6-1 libreadline.so.3 is needed by samba-2.2.6-1 ncurses4-5.0-4.i386.rpm and ncurses-5.2-12.i386.rpm is already installed and "/usr/lib/libreadline.so.4" exists on the system. Can someone tell me if it safe to install 2.2.6 with '--nodeps' or, if that is not the best way out, point me to the correct solution? Thanks, Tarvin Rhodes Network Admin Sysco/Charlotte 704.723.6062

On 06/10/2017 09:14 AM, Aaryaman Vasishta wrote: > See the 'wt' on the first fmul in exacanv110.fp, exacmnv110.fp and > exasanv110.fp. Any ideas on what could be causing the first fmul to > require $r0 and/or $r1? 'tex nodep $r4 $r2 0x0 0x1 t2d 0xf' is actually: 'tex nodep $r4:$r7 $r2 0x0 0x1 t2d 0xf' Very confusing, I know. > > Cheers, > Aaryaman

Sorry for the late response, been busy with some personal stuff + work... On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:52 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 5:46 PM, Samuel Pitoiset > <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 06/10/2017 09:14 AM, Aaryaman Vasishta wrote: > >> > >> See the 'wt' on the

This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. rendercheck tests seem consistent with/without this patch. I haven't extensively tested them though. Trello: https://trello.com/c/6LPB2EIS/174-update-maxwell-shaders-with-proper-delays Signed-off-by: Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> --- src/shader/exac8nv110.fp | 10 +++++----- src/shader/exac8nv110.fpc | 18

v4: Updated the wait dependancy bars based on tex component masks. This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. Tested with rendercheck -f a8r8g8b8. I am still wondering whether the rd's are required. We could still wait on the write bars instead. eg. see "sched (st 0xf wr 0x1 wt 0x2) (st 0xf wr 0x1 wt 0x2) (st 0xf)" in exacmnv110.fp Trello:

Removed explicit depar instructions as they're not used by the blob anymore. Signed-off-by: Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> --- src/shader/exac8nv110.fp | 5 ++--- src/shader/exac8nv110.fpc | 10 ++++------ src/shader/exacanv110.fp | 5 ++--- src/shader/exacanv110.fpc | 10 ++++------ src/shader/exacmnv110.fp | 5 ++--- src/shader/exacmnv110.fpc | 10 ++++------

On May 24, 2015 4:46:18 PM PDT, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: >> On May 24, 2015, at 18:24, Kirk Bocek <t004 at kbocek.com> wrote: >> >> So: >> >> $rpm -e --nodeps chrony > >No. Bad. > Okay, okay! I'll go on the paper. I'll reinstall chrony. But there *are* places I've needed to use nodeps. Mostly to manage inter-repo package incompatibilities. Fortunately this isn't yet a production host but more a chance to learn all the changes...

v2: Add missing delays This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. rendercheck tests seem consistent with/without this patch. I haven't extensively tested them though. Trello: https://trello.com/c/6LPB2EIS/174-update-maxwell-shaders-with-proper-delays Signed-off-by: Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> --- src/shader/exac8nv110.fp | 10 +++++-----

Just tried to install RPMs to a RHEL 5.5 64-bit machine, failed too. #rpm -ihv --nodeps http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/RPMS/x86_64/syslinux-tftpboot-3.86-1.x86_64.rpm error: unpacking of archive failed: cpio: Bad Magic #rpm -ihv --nodeps http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/boot/syslinux/RPMS/x86_64/syslinux-tftpboot-3.84-1.x86_64.rpm error: unpacking of archiv...

I am testing the likelyhood of updating a couple RH9 systems to centos 5 386. I found at document that talked about updating to centos 4. steps being: 1.) backup 2.) rpm --import http://pubmirrors.reflected.net/centos/5/os/i386/RPM-GPG-KEY-centOS-5 rpm -Uvh --nodeps http://pubmirrors.reflected.net/centos/5/os/i386/CentOS/yum-3.0.5-1.el5.centos.5.noarch.rpm rpm -i --nodeps --force http://pubmirrors.reflected.net/centos/5/os/i386/CentOS/centos-release-5-1.0.el5.centos.1.i386.rpm yum upgrade Everything was progressing until I did tte &quo...

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: > Nice work! > > See my comments below, and double-check if some of them can be applied to > the shaders I didn't review yet. > > I recommend you to test your work because if one sched code is wrong, you > are likely going to kill your card and reboot your box. :-) > > >

Hi, On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > BTW, you can drop those explicit "depbar" ops. I think they're only > needed when you're doing something weird with barriers. Blob doesn't > use them (anymore) > Gotcha. Should I remove them in the same patch or a different one? It seems like the depbar removal is

On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 06/07/2017 06:58 PM, Aaryaman Vasishta wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Samuel Pitoiset < >> samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com <mailto:samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Nice work! >> >> See my

v5: Rebased on depbar removal patch; removed a redundant read dep-bar. This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. rendercheck tests seem consistent with/without this patch. I haven't extensively tested them though. Trello: https://trello.com/c/6LPB2EIS/174-update-maxwell-shaders-with-proper-delays Signed-off-by: Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> ---

This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. rendercheck tests seem consistent with/without this patch. I haven't extensively tested them though. Trello: https://trello.com/c/6LPB2EIS/174-update-maxwell-shaders-with-proper-delays Signed-off-by: Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> --- src/shader/exac8nv110.fp | 10 +++++----- src/shader/exac8nv110.fpc | 18

Do you still have some glitches or does it work correctly now? Did you also remove the spurious wait dep bars between v3 and v4? On 06/27/2017 05:16 PM, Aaryaman Vasishta wrote: > v4: Updated the wait dependancy bars based on tex component masks. > > This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. Tested with > rendercheck -f a8r8g8b8. > > I am still wondering whether

See the 'wt' on the first fmul in exacanv110.fp, exacmnv110.fp and exasanv110.fp. Any ideas on what could be causing the first fmul to require $r0 and/or $r1? Cheers, Aaryaman On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Aaryaman Vasishta < jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> wrote: > This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa shaders. rendercheck tests > seem consistent with/without this

BTW, you can drop those explicit "depbar" ops. I think they're only needed when you're doing something weird with barriers. Blob doesn't use them (anymore) On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Aaryaman Vasishta <jem456.vasishta at gmail.com> wrote: > v4: Updated the wait dependancy bars based on tex component masks. > > This patch adds proper delays to maxwell

On 06/07/2017 06:58 PM, Aaryaman Vasishta wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:15 AM, Samuel Pitoiset > <samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com <mailto:samuel.pitoiset at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Nice work! > > See my comments below, and double-check if some of them can be > applied to the shaders I didn't review yet. > > I recommend you

Nice work! See my comments below, and double-check if some of them can be applied to the shaders I didn't review yet. I recommend you to test your work because if one sched code is wrong, you are likely going to kill your card and reboot your box. :-) On 06/03/2017 04:16 PM, Aaryaman Vasishta wrote: > v2: Add missing delays > > This patch adds proper delays to maxwell exa