search for: node10

Hi, I have a 5-nodes GlusterFS cluster with Distributed-Replicate. There are 180 bricks in total. The OS is CentOS6.5, and GlusterFS is 3.11.0. I find many bricks are offline when we generate some empty files and rename them. I see xfs call trace in every node. For example, Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: XFS (rdc00d28p2): Internal error xfs_trans_cancel at line 1948 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller 0xffffffffa04e33f9 Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: Pid: 9939, comm: glusterfsd Tainted: G --------------- H 2.6.32-prsys.1.1.0.13.x86_64 #1 Nov 16 11:15:12...

...GlusterFS cluster with Distributed-Replicate. There are > 180 bricks in total. The OS is CentOS6.5, and GlusterFS is 3.11.0. I find > many bricks are offline when we generate some empty files and rename them. > I see xfs call trace in every node. > > For example, > Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: XFS (rdc00d28p2): Internal error > xfs_trans_cancel at line 1948 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c. Caller > 0xffffffffa04e33f9 > Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: > Nov 16 11:15:12 node10 kernel: Pid: 9939, comm: glusterfsd Tainted: G > --------------- H 2.6.32-prsys.1.1.0.13.x...

hello all, we are developing and porting vorbis1decoder on a 24 bit platform. in the process we came across somedoubts about node bytes and leaf words. from the specification we got that we are arranging the huffman codeword tree into an array. the nodebytes are the number of bytes that are required to represent a node and leafwords are the no. of bytes required to represent the leaf i.e the

...node4:f0 -> node5; node6[label = "<f0> 0 | <f1> | <f2> 1"]; node7[label = "<f0> 0 | <f1> | <f2> 1"]; node8[label = "<f0> 0 | <f1> | <f2> 1"]; node9 [shape = ellipse, label = "3"]; node8:f0 -> node9; node10[label = "<f0> 0 | <f1> | <f2> 1"]; node11 [shape = ellipse, label = "5"]; node10:f0 -> node11; node12 [shape = ellipse, label = "7"]; node10:f2 -> node12; node8:f2 -> node10:f1 node7:f0 -> node8:f1 node13 [shape = ellipse, label = "6&...

Jeff, It's in the manual: http://www.speex.org/docs/manual/speex-manual/node10.html (table 3 and 4). However, if you're asking this, you're probably trying to do something wrong, or the hard way. You probably shouldn't be taking speex output, and trying to "count bytes". If you are using the API, then you will just get the bits out, and then you'...

Hi, I am a bit confused on how code-words are derived from the codeword lengths. I will appreciate if someone can point me in the correct direction. I will take the example of an actual codebook that i found in a valid vorbis encoded file as shown below. [SK] +------Codebook [0] -------- [SK] Codebook Dimensions = 1 [SK] Codebook Entries = 8 [SK] Unordered [SK] 1, 6, 3, 7, 2, 5, 4, 7, [SK] NO

...pit >it out on the network via RTP. I haven't been able to find a library or >code >example that does that. > > >On 11/01/2010 12:03 PM, Steve Kann wrote: >> Jeff, >> >> It's in the manual: >> >> http://www.speex.org/docs/manual/speex-manual/node10.html (table 3 and >>4). >> >> However, if you're asking this, you're probably trying to do something >> wrong, or the hard way. You probably shouldn't be taking speex output, >> and trying to "count bytes". If you are using the API, then you w...

Folks, I would like to use Speex for an speech enhancement project and it requires manipulation of coded parameters. I was wondering whether any of you could provide some info. on the following queries, /*Encode the frame*/ speex_encode(state, input, &bits); Can I print the ASCII values of these bits (I mean how?). I did read the bit allocation available at below url, so that I could

Hello, ????????at the beginning I want to underline that I've read SpeeX documentation and did some tests. I know that SpeeX was designed for networks in which packets arrive without errors, or don't arrive at all. SpeeX is very attractive if we consider low bit rates. I need to use SpeeX in very noisy environment, where speech quality doesn't matter, I'm interested in 2kb/s

Dear all, I was interested to get an idea on how the computational complexity is affected by different modes, assuming a fixed complexity setting. I saw in the documentation (Table 4 http://www.speex.org/docs/manual/speex-manual/node10.html) that going to higher data bit rate does not always increase the complexity (e.g. 11 kbps require 14 mflops while 15 kbps require 11 mflops). Is this correct? Would a fixed-point implementation have the same behavior? Thank you in advance. Best Regards, Emmanuel

...ll works Can anybody point me to the discussion (linux-net, maybe?) where support for setting the PROMISC flag was pulled from the "ip" utility. I''d like t understand a bit better why this is so. Thanks for any answers, -Martin [0] http://www.detached.net/ip-routing/ip-cref/node10.html -- Martin A. Brown --- SecurePipe, Inc. --- mabrown@securepipe.com _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...running 5 node4 running 6 node5 running 7 node6 running 8 node7 running 9 node8 running 10 node9 running 11 node10 running 12 node11 running 13 node12 running 14 node13 running 15 node14 running 15 node14 running 16 node16...

...t; ] node5 [ label="5: [ inf, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] node6 [ label="6: [ 6.250000e-02, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] node7 [ label="7: [ 7.500000e-02, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] node8 [ label="8: [ inf, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] node9 [ label="9: [ inf, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] node10 [ label="10: [ inf, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] node11 [ label="11: [ inf, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] node12 [ label="12: [ 3.750000e-01, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] edge [ len=13 ] node0 -- node1 [ label="[ 0.000000e+00, 0.000000e+00 ]\n[ 0.000000e+00, inf ]\n" ] node0 -- node...

...o take the output of the speex encoder and spit it out on the network via RTP. I haven't been able to find a library or code example that does that. On 11/01/2010 12:03 PM, Steve Kann wrote: > Jeff, > > It's in the manual: > > http://www.speex.org/docs/manual/speex-manual/node10.html (table 3 and 4). > > However, if you're asking this, you're probably trying to do something > wrong, or the hard way. You probably shouldn't be taking speex output, > and trying to "count bytes". If you are using the API, then you will > just get the bi...

...en't been able to find a library or >> code >> example that does that. >> >> >> On 11/01/2010 12:03 PM, Steve Kann wrote: >>> Jeff, >>> >>> It's in the manual: >>> >>> http://www.speex.org/docs/manual/speex-manual/node10.html (table 3 and >>> 4). >>> >>> However, if you're asking this, you're probably trying to do something >>> wrong, or the hard way. You probably shouldn't be taking speex output, >>> and trying to "count bytes". If you are usin...

Jeff, RFC-5574 is standards-track: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5574 so, while it's not an approved standard, it's more standardized than a lot of interoperable traffic on the internets these days. The RFC specifies packetization guidelines, which is basically that you put one or more frames in a packet, and then pad the rest with 0 bits until you have a while number of octets.

...for a "table" in the specification here providing link between "mode" and "bitrate". Else, you get those mails: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2006-March/004288.html If I get it right, the table is there: http://www.speex.org/docs/manual/speex-manual/node10.html Table 4: Quality versus bit-rate Also, this table exists for narrowband, but still it does not for wideband or ultrawideband: it would be nice to get also those ones. I was really lost implementing this in my SIP application. Examples: m=audio 8008 RTP/AVP 97 a=rtpm...

...t;5: [ inf, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] > node6 [ label="6: [ 6.250000e-02, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] > node7 [ label="7: [ 7.500000e-02, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] > node8 [ label="8: [ inf, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] > node9 [ label="9: [ inf, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] > node10 [ label="10: [ inf, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] > node11 [ label="11: [ inf, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] > node12 [ label="12: [ 3.750000e-01, 0.000000e+00 ]" ] > edge [ len=13 ] > node0 -- node1 [ label="[ 0.000000e+00, 0.000000e+00 ]\n[ > 0.000000e+00, inf ]\...

...the specification here providing link > between "mode" and "bitrate". Else, you get those mails: > > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/2006-March/004288.html > > If I get it right, the table is there: > http://www.speex.org/docs/manual/speex-manual/node10.html > Table 4: Quality versus bit-rate > > Also, this table exists for narrowband, but still it does not for > wideband or ultrawideband: it would be nice to get also those ones. I > was really lost implementing this in my SIP application. Yes, I just checked that in into svn....

Hi Lang, I'm surprised about the fact that you omit R1/R2 reductions in some cases. Can you give a more detailed description of the bug (e.g. a PBQP dump)? Best regards, Sebastian Lang Hames wrote: > Hi Sachin, llvm-dev, > > I've just committed a new PBQP solver which, among other things, > should take care of this bug. > > Please let me know how it works out for you.