Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "nochildren".
2003 Sep 04
1
still getting weird .{inbox} folder creations with latest -test7
...\Deleted \Seen \Draft \*)] Flags permitted.
* 0 EXISTS
* 0 RECENT
* OK [UIDVALIDITY 1062657336] UIDs valid
* OK [UIDNEXT 12] Predicted next UID
a0003 OK [READ-WRITE] Select completed.
a0004 OK NOOP completed.
* NAMESPACE (("" ".")) NIL NIL
a0005 OK Namespace completed.
* LIST (\NoChildren) "." INBOX
* LIST (\NoChildren) "." "procmaillog"
a0006 OK List completed.
* NAMESPACE (("" ".")) NIL NIL
a0007 OK Namespace completed.
* LIST (\NoChildren) "." INBOX
* LIST (\NoChildren) "." "procmaillog"
a0008 OK List...
2003 Jul 24
2
Why does dovecot confuse mutt?
Heylas,
I just switched my primary mail server from courier imap to dovecot (I've been waiting to do this; dovecot showed up in debian testing for alpha, at last). So, using the same set of maildirs, there are slightly different behaviors.
First, of course, dovecot displays the hierarchy as I thought it ought to be, such that INBOX is a sibling of all other top-level boxes, not the parent
2003 Nov 13
2
Children, HasChildren
...t;.\" \"lists\"
* LSUB (\\Noselect \\Children) \".\" \"prive\"
a0001 OK Lsub completed.
", 1024) = 374
Now this is strange - I read RFC3348 and shouldn't \\Children be
\\HasChildren, also shouldn't the plain mailboxes (first four)
be listed with \\HasNoChildren ?
Mike.
2008 Jul 23
1
\HasNoChildren versus \Noinferiors in ACL plugin and no CREATE permission
...n with dovecot 1.1.1 I expected that a Maildir was listed as
* LIST (\NoInferiors) "/" "Foldername"
if "create" (k) permission is not set in ACLs and there doesn't exists any
subfolders. But to my surprise, dovecot gives the following output:
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "/" "Foldername"
Therefore the client (here: SquirrelMail) does not know about the inability
to create subfolders and offers "Foldername" in the selection for the
parent folder.
If there are exists already subfolders of "Foldername", dovecot has to use
\Ha...
2002 Mar 01
4
UI regression
Hi,
Earlier this year I "upgraded" from wine 20010510 to 20011226 in order
to see if some kind of resource leak was fixed which caused screen
redraws to get progressively slower and slower and slower and slower, ....
That was fixed but there seemed to be a significant number of graphics
and UI regressions. I've just upgraded to 20020228 to see if things
were any better and within