Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "noautopad".
Did you mean:
noautoload
2020 Mar 24
3
Status of Intel JCC Mitigations and Next Steps
...doing so would break known idioms. The list of
such idioms is, IMO, ad hoc. This assembler support does not include
prefix or immediate padding.
Philip
p.s. For those interested, here's roughly what the last round of
assembler syntax I remember being discussed looked like.
.autopadding
.noautopadding
These two directives would respectively enable and disable automatic
padding of instructions within the region defined. It's presumed to be
legal to insert nops between instructions, modify encodings, or
otherwise adjust offsets of instruction boundaries within the region to
achieve t...
2020 Mar 25
3
Status of Intel JCC Mitigations and Next Steps
...uch idioms is, IMO, ad hoc. This assembler support does not include
> prefix or immediate padding.
>
>
>
> Philip
>
> p.s. For those interested, here's roughly what the last round of assembler
> syntax I remember being discussed looked like.
>
> .autopadding
> .noautopadding
>
> These two directives would respectively enable and disable automatic
> padding of instructions within the region defined. It's presumed to be
> legal to insert nops between instructions, modify encodings, or otherwise
> adjust offsets of instruction boundaries within the...
2020 Mar 25
2
Status of Intel JCC Mitigations and Next Steps
...doing so would break known idioms. The list of such idioms is, IMO, ad hoc. This assembler support does not include prefix or immediate padding.
Philip
p.s. For those interested, here's roughly what the last round of assembler syntax I remember being discussed looked like.
.autopadding
.noautopadding
These two directives would respectively enable and disable automatic padding of instructions within the region defined. It's presumed to be legal to insert nops between instructions, modify encodings, or otherwise adjust offsets of instruction boundaries within the region to achieve targe...