Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "noargument".
Did you mean:
no_argument
2005 Jun 01
2
A suggestion to improve ifelse behaviour with vector yes/noarguments
> Thomas Lumley wrote:
> > On Tue, 31 May 2005, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> >
> >
> >>M??kinen Jussi wrote:
> >>
> >>>Dear All,
> >>>
> >>>I luckily found the following feature (or problem) when tried to
> >>>apply
> >>>ifelse-function to an ordered data.
> >>>
> >>>
>
2005 May 31
2
A suggestion to improve ifelse behaviour with vector yes/no arguments
Dear All,
I luckily found the following feature (or problem) when tried to apply ifelse-function to an ordered data.
> test <- c(TRUE, TRUE, TRUE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE, FALSE)
> ifelse(test, 0, 1:4)
[1] 0 0 0 4 1 2 3
>
It roots into the ifelse-syntax:
ans[!test & !nas] <- rep(no, length.out = length(ans))[!test & !nas]
Would it be possible to disable this feature in the