Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "no_stop_on_error".
2016 Nov 04
4
Running package tests and not stop on first fail
...tions. I think it
> is a good start that can eventually be extended later for
> what you are asking.
I tend to agree; this seems indeed much easier than I
anticipated. Thank you, Jan!
I'm testing a version which uses the logical variable
'stop_on_error' rather than 'no_stop_on_error' (because
!no_stop_on_error is hard to mentally parse quickly).
My proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if
somebody has a more concise or better "English style" wording
(which is somewhat compatible with all the other options you see
from 'R CMD check --...
2016 Nov 04
0
Running package tests and not stop on first fail
...d start that can eventually be extended later for
> > what you are asking.
>
> I tend to agree; this seems indeed much easier than I
> anticipated. Thank you, Jan!
>
> I'm testing a version which uses the logical variable
> 'stop_on_error' rather than 'no_stop_on_error' (because
> !no_stop_on_error is hard to mentally parse quickly).
>
> My proposed name '--no-stop-on-error' was a quick shot; if
> somebody has a more concise or better "English style" wording
> (which is somewhat compatible with all the other options you see...
2016 Nov 03
2
Running package tests and not stop on first fail
Hi Martin, Jan,
On 11/03/2016 03:45 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> Jan Gorecki <J.Gorecki at wit.edu.pl>
>>>>>> on Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:51:28 +0000 writes:
>
> > Hello community/devs, Is there an option to run package
> > tests during R CMD check and not stop on first error? I
> > know that testing frameworks (testhat