search for: no_scan_tag

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 12:37:07PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Unfortunately we never free the database. > > Hm it is never freed? Wouldn't that result in actual leaks, since > OsinfoDb_t_finalize (g_object_unref'ing the OsinfoDb) wouldn't be > called? I was thinking because of this:

...om/libguestfs/virt-v2v/blob/cc294b7735dda467179b93a061d3631ac3547f26/v2v/libosinfo_utils.ml#L24 > > which IIUC will allocate a DB (on first access) but it is never > released. Oh this is interesting. I read in the documentation that custom blocks have tag Custom_tag, which is higher than No_scan_tag, and thus they aren't scanned by the GC. Indeed, even trying to Gc.finalize on the object inside the lazy seems to have no effect. I guess this is becase db is a top-level variable in Libosinfo_utils; is there a way to change that behaviour somehow? > > > It could be that to express...

The following series of patches fill in most of the gaps in the OCaml bindings to libxl, to make them useful for clients such as xapi/xenopsd (from XCP). There are a number of bugfixes to the existing bindings as well. I have an experimental version of xenopsd that successfully uses the new bindings. An earlier version of the first half of the series was submitted to the last by Ian Campbell on