Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "no_polici".
Did you mean:
no_policy
2009 Sep 25
0
[LLVMdev] MemoryBuffer
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Gordon Henriksen
<gordonhenriksen at me.com> wrote:
> On 2009-09-24, at 18:56, OvermindDL1 wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, what code in Clang is optimized by doing a
> pointer derefence then compare to 0, rather then just comparing two
> points directly? Does not seem that efficient when laid out like that,
> which is why I am curious what
2006 Jul 06
12
kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:1133!
Looks like the GSO is involved?
I got this while running Dom0 only (no guests), with a
BOINC/Rosetta@home application running on all 4 cores.
changeset: 10649:8e55c5c11475
Build: x86_32p (pae).
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at net/core/dev.c:1133!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
SMP
CPU: 0
EIP: 0061:[<c04dceb0>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00210297 (2.6.16.13-xen
2009 Sep 24
7
[LLVMdev] MemoryBuffer
I was writing something using MemoryBuffer, and while looking through
its code I came across line 59:
assert(BufEnd[0] == 0 && "Buffer is not null terminated!");
I am curious if the MemoryBuffer only supports non-binary, non-null
embedded files, or if it supports binary as well. I do not see
anything inherently not expecting binary files except for that one
line, so I am