Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "no_part".
Did you mean:
p_part
2001 Mar 02
0
[OT] correspondence analysis w/ non-mutually-exclusive ca tegories
...>
> in this table, presumably, an observation can fall in only one
> cell: red/light, say, or dark/fair.
>
> - However, my data are different, in that a single observation can
> (theoretically) fall in two or more cells. Consider:
>
> voted98 voted00 donated protested no_partic
> male
> female
>
> a given observation might fall, for example, in male/voted98 and
> male/voted00. What are the implications of this?
>
> - I am aware of the multiple correspondence technique, which I believe
> answers (some of) this issue. However I have a different...
2001 Mar 01
1
[OT] correspondence analysis w/ non-mutually-exclusive categories
...26
dark 98 48 403 681 85
in this table, presumably, an observation can fall in only one
cell: red/light, say, or dark/fair.
- However, my data are different, in that a single observation can
(theoretically) fall in two or more cells. Consider:
voted98 voted00 donated protested no_partic
male
female
a given observation might fall, for example, in male/voted98 and
male/voted00. What are the implications of this?
- I am aware of the multiple correspondence technique, which I believe
answers (some of) this issue. However I have a different problem with
it: I have so many observat...