Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "no_direct_tail".
2015 Sep 24
2
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
...gt; OK. I'm considering changing the direction of this patch and marking
> the call site instead of the called function.
>
> We should also discuss what kinds of source level attributes we'll
> need. My plan is to attach an attribute that indicates notail
> (something like no_direct_tail) to the called function declaration and
> definition and then mark all the direct call sites in the IR that call
> the function as notaill. In addition to that, it seems like we want to
> have a way to attach the attribute directly to the call site:
>
> void (*indirectCall)(int, i...
2015 Sep 24
2
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
...ing the direction of this patch and
>> marking the call site instead of the called function.
>>
>> We should also discuss what kinds of source level attributes
>> we'll need. My plan is to attach an attribute that indicates
>> notail (something like no_direct_tail) to the called function
>> declaration and definition and then mark all the direct call
>> sites in the IR that call the function as notaill. In addition to
>> that, it seems like we want to have a way to attach the attribute
>> directly to the call site:
>...
2015 Sep 23
3
[PATCH] D12923: Add support for function attribute "notail"
On 09/23/2015 08:48 AM, Akira Hatanaka wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Philip Reames
> <listmail at philipreames.com <mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>> wrote:
>
> To be clear, this is a debuging aid only? It's not something
> required for correctness? I'm somewhat bothered by that because
> it seems like it would be a useful