search for: nmg

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "nmg".

Did you mean: img
2013 Aug 17
1
[LLVMdev] [brlcad-devel] Clang vs. gcc for building BRL-CAD
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Tom Browder <tom.browder at gmail.com>wrote: >>>
2007 Aug 10
1
Subsetting by number of observations in a factor
...group code (mg). There may be varying numbers of observations per management group, and he would like to subset the dataframe such that there are always at least n per management group. I presume I can get to this using table or tapply, then (and I'm not sure how on this bit) creating a column nmg containing the number of observations that corresponds to mg for that row, then simply subsetting. So, am I on the right track? If so how do I actually do it, and is there an easier method than I am considering. Thanks for your help, Ron
2003 Dec 01
0
No subject
...atus of the printer (lpd) is: waiting for subserver to exit ... or cannot open /dev/lp0 - Device or resource busy, when this occures. Can anyone help me to solve this ? Thank you, Zoltan Perhacs Return-Path: <cyrille.dubray@apic.fr> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.nmg.fr (mail.nmg.fr [212.180.127.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E96144E2 for <samba@lists.samba.org>; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 03:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from era (nmg_mlh151 [172.16.1.151]) by mail.nmg.fr (8.11.0/8.8.7) with SMTP id f6UAAn828047 for <samba@lists.samba.org&g...
1998 Nov 30
1
corrupt files when writting to samba server
Hi I'm having some problems running samba 2.0beta2: when I try to write files to the samba server aprox. 1/3 of the files get full of null characters. I'm using samba in Digital Unix 4.0d compiled with the native cc and the samba server is registered in a NT domain controlled by a NT machine (security=domain). Any ideas? Is this a known bug?