search for: nmbuf

I first met this problem when our (60 students) internetgateway refused to boot its new kernel, it was a 4.7-RELEASE. Then i loaded the old kernel and went home to check if my 4.8-STABLE does likewise. And the answer was yes! Both kernels were GENERIC + these options taken from the dummynet man pages: options DUMMYNET options NMBCLUSTERS options HZ When i boot the machine

...the server stats: * 2x Xeon 2.8 with SMP compiled, hyperthreading NOT compiled in kernel * 4 GB of RAM, 8 GB of swap on Raid 1 (15K RPM drives) for speed * User Data is on Raid 5 in a detached PowerVault Contents of /boot/loader.conf: kern.ipc.maxsockets=32768 kern.ipc.nmbclusters=32768 kern.ipc.nmbufs=131072 kern.ipc.nsfbufs=6656 kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 kern.maxfiles=32768 kern.maxproc=8192 kern.maxswzone=33554432 kern.nbuf=16384 kern.ncallout=32768 kern.vm.kmem.size=268435456 kern.vm.pmap.shpgperproc=2048 net.inet.tcp.tcbhashsize=16384 Contents of /etc/sysctl.conf: kern.ip.somaxconn=4096 vm....

Andre, Are you going to have time to MFC things from -current for auto-tuning -stable before 9.2? I fear (maybe unnecessarily?) that we are about to ship yet another release that can't do basic 10gigE when sufficient memory exists. If you don't have time, then let me know and I'll see what I can do. -- Alfred Perlstein VP Software Engineering, iXsystems

...N|BG_BLACK)" options SC_NORM_REV_ATTR="(FG_YELLOW|BG_GREEN)" options SC_KERNEL_CONS_ATTR="(FG_RED|BG_BLACK)" options SC_KERNEL_CONS_REV_ATTR="(FG_BLACK|BG_RED)" options UFS_DIRHASH options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE options NMBUFS=81408 options NMBCLUSTERS=20352 device isa device pci device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 device fd1 at fdc0 drive 1 device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 device ata1 at isa?...