search for: nmbd_workgroupdb

Hello, I'm having a problem logging in to the Samba domain from an XP machine. The machine is added to the domain but after reboot I can't login. I've done the signorseal registry hack but I'm still not able to login. The error I get when logging in is this: "Windows cannot connect to the domain, either because the domain controller is down or otherwise unavailable, or

Hi everyone. I just got a copy of Win2k in and have been messing with it. Have a question, and have searched the archives for the answer, but didn't find it. Can Win2k domain logon to a pre-3.0.0 samba server? Or di I need to get TNG running? I can get NT4.0 boxes to authenticate and login fine (Samba pre-3.0.0), but Win2k keeps complaining: "The following error occurred validating

...; IP 0.0.0.0 [2006/09/21 12:35:25, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:debug_browse_data(100) debug_browse_data(): 0 char .UK_PDC. hex 0d 55 4b 5f 50 44 43 00 [2006/09/21 12:35:25, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(777) Sending a packet of len 176 to (0.0.0.0) on port 138 [2006/09/21 12:35:25, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(282) dump_workgroups() dump workgroup on subnet 10.10.20.1: netmask= 255.255.255.0: DOMAIN_UK(1) current master browser = UK_PDC UK_PDC 408c9b0b (UK PDC) PAULP4 40011207 () [2006/09/21 12:35:25, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_wor...

....10.253: Nov 22 13:20:30 localhost nmbd.bis[3275]: #*011ETUDIANT(1) current master browser = UNKNOWN *Some help ? here is the log: announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser: t (1258892410) - last(1258891660) < 900 Nov 22 13:20:20 localhost nmbd.bis[3275]: [2009/11/22 13:20:20, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(170) Nov 22 13:20:20 localhost nmbd.bis[3275]: find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for ETUDIANT on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. Nov 22 13:20:20 localhost nmbd.bis[3275]: [2009/11/22 13:20:20, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(170) Nov 22 13:...

...added that (_tcp._ldap.dc._msdcs.ifs. SRV 0 0 0 .) to my config, but still no succes (thought that wouldn't do much anyway, since the link says it's only to reduce unneccessary traffic). Samba show's _only changes in nmbd-logfile_: <snip> [2003/08/25 14:30:00, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(156) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for IFS on subnet 10.21.32.1: found. [2003/08/25 14:30:00, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(156) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for IFS on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2003/08/25 1...

...I have attached a log file of a session where I try and create a folder. I would appreciate any pointers to a solution. ================LOG FILE================================ =====================================================================================[2003/02/20 16:54:14, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(161) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for WWAUS on subnet 192.168.1.13: found. [2003/02/20 16:54:14, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(161) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for WWAUS on subnet 192.168.1.251: found. [2003/02/20 1...

...r force group = users read only = No create mask = 0644 directory mask = 0775 force directory mode = 0775 guest ok = Yes use sendfile = Yes write cache size = 65536 I noticed weird messages in nmbd.log: [2005/05/15 02:50:27, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(162) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for SYSTINET on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2005/05/15 02:50:27, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(162) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for SYSTINET on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [20...

...8) Transaction 0 of length 72 [2002/10/25 15:22:14, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(91) netbios connect: name1=FI0X07 name2=FI0P38 [2002/10/25 15:22:14, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(110) netbios connect: local=fi0x07 remote=fi0p38 log.nmbd *********** [2002/10/25 15:19:45, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(160) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for BCCFILOTTRANO on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2002/10/25 15:19:45, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(160) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for BCCFILOTTRANO on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: fou...

...d only = No [tmp] comment = temporary files path = /tmp read only = yes -------------- next part -------------- [2004/10/05 11:14:43, 5] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1194) process_dgram: ignoring dgram packet sent to name COMPUTER LABS<1d> from 10.9.1.10 [2004/10/05 11:14:43, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(162) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for NWU_TEST on subnet 10.9.1.111: found. [2004/10/05 11:14:43, 10] nmbd/nmbd_sendannounce.c:announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser(382) announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser: t (1096992883) - last(1096992397) <...

...========================================== Lines followed by "#tested" were changed to find sollution but with no success. There is log piece covering period of time while BARTEKR disappears: #================================================= [2011/05/06 20:04:03.848346, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:170(find_workgroup_on_subnet) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for ENELPC on subnet 192.168.7.1: found. [2011/05/06 20:04:03.848486, 10] nmbd/nmbd_sendannounce.c:381(announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser) announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser: t (1304705033) - last(130470...

...is account, even based on group membership, the unix side of the job seems to be quite settled. The windows side will have to wait a little bit as it requires my physical presence. The only cosmetic thing is that I still get this in my log files: | [2019/06/14 06:04:22.007350, 4] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:276(dump_workgroups) | dump_workgroups() | dump workgroup on subnet 192.168.1.13: netmask= 255.255.255.0: | WORKGROUP(1) current master browser = CONTROLLER | CONTROLLER 40849a03 (Samba 4.9.5-Debian) | MAC01 40001003 (Mac01) | RNP00...

...a(): 0 char ..F-LAPTOP-SJG. hex 02 00 46 2d 4c 41 50 54 4f 50 2d 53 4a 47 00 [2003/12/05 14:47:30, 3] nmbd/nmbd_incomingdgrams.c:process_announce_request(784) process_announce_request: Announce request from F-LAPTOP-SJG<00> IP 192.168.213.29 to FUSION<1d>. [2003/12/05 14:47:30, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(157) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for FUSION on subnet 192.168.213.9: found. [2003/12/05 14:47:30, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(157) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for FUSION on subnet 192.168.213.9: found. [2003/12/05 14:4...

...ing list from a few years ago, but it looks like there was never a clear resolution. (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-February/189450.html). I’m fairly frequently receiving the following error in my logs: Feb 5 11:16:22 hal nmbd[19333]: [2018/02/05 11:16:22.889584, 0] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:57(name_to_unstring) Feb 5 11:16:22 hal nmbd[19333]: name_to_nstring: workgroup name COOMBS ^[ is too long. Truncating to I’m running Samba 4.7.4 on FreeBSD 11.1. My smb4.conf file has the workgroup name as “COOMBS”, with NO trailing spaces. Here’s the complete configuration file: [g...

...side of the job seems to be > quite settled. The windows side will have to wait a little bit as it > requires my physical presence. Windows should just work > > The only cosmetic thing is that I still get this in my log files: > > | [2019/06/14 06:04:22.007350, 4] ../source3/nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:276(dump_workgroups) > | dump_workgroups() > | dump workgroup on subnet 192.168.1.13: netmask= 255.255.255.0: > | WORKGROUP(1) current master browser = CONTROLLER > | CONTROLLER 40849a03 (Samba 4.9.5-Debian) > | MAC01 40001003 (Mac01...

...scount=0 arcount=0 answers: nmb_name=U86F.DOM<1b> rr_type=32 rr_class=1 ttl=259200 answers 0 char ...... hex 00000AF48E02 [Tue Dec 13 17:09:08 2005 , 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(776) Sending a packet of len 62 to (10.244.142.1) on port 137 [Tue Dec 13 17:09:08 2005 , 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(172) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for U86F.DOM on subnet 10.244.142.2 : found. [Tue Dec 13 17:09:08 2005 , 10] nmbd/nmbd_sendannounce.c:announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser(372) announce_myself_to_domain_master_browser: no unicast subnet, ignoring. [...

...weren't added to domain yet. I would like to see every windows clients listed in Network icon. I activated these services, but it keeps not working. I think my samba DCs are OK, less the following log message, that I'm not sure if it's normal: 1. [2012/10/10 14:40:52.257211, 0] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:281(dump_workgroups) 2. dump_workgroups() 3. dump workgroup on subnet 10.0.5.5: netmask= 255.255.248.0: 4. WORKGROUP(2) current master browser = UNKNOWN 5. NetworkDomain (1) current master browser = PDC 1 6. PDC1 40849b3b (PDC 1 ) 7. BDC1 40809...

...AST_SUBNET. Error - should be sent to WINS server nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:query_name_response(109) query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 172.16.1.3 for name HQ<1d>. This response was from IP 172.16.1.40, reporting an IP address of 172.16.1.40. nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(282) dump_workgroups() dump workgroup on subnet 172.16.1.3: netmask= 255.255.255.0: HQ(1) current master browser = USACHEV-SV SAMBA 40809b3b (Samba Server) nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(282) dump_workgroups() dump workgroup...

...day, I get this error message. It's always around 4:02AM. Jul 6 04:02:10 print-server nmbd[3069]: [2006/07/06 04:02:10, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:process(596) Jul 6 04:02:10 print-server nmbd[3069]: Got SIGHUP dumping debug info. Jul 6 04:02:10 print-server nmbd[3069]: [2006/07/06 04:02:10, 0] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(284) Jul 6 04:02:10 print-server nmbd[3069]: dump_workgroups() Jul 6 04:02:10 print-server nmbd[3069]: dump workgroup on subnet 10.0.255.62: netmask= 255.255.0.0: Jul 6 04:02:10 print-server nmbd[3069]: DOMAIN(1) current master browser = DOMAIN-DC2 Jul 6 04:0...

Hi people, sorry for the previous HTML stuff, I hope this time it's plain text. Here's my problem: I'm not sure if this is a samba/solaris problem or a Win98 problem and I'll tell you why. I have a Solaris 8 server running samba 2.2.2, a linux/samba 2.0.7 box and a couple Win 98 boxes. When I did a complete restore of my Win98 box from tape, I could no longer access the Solaris

...ancount=1 nscount=0 arcount=0 answers: nmb_name=EB<1c> rr_type=32 rr_class=1 ttl=259200 answers 0 char ...... hex E000C0A800FB [2013/07/15 16:39:26, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:819(send_udp) Sending a packet of len 62 to (192.168.0.89) on port 137 [2013/07/15 16:39:26, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:170(find_workgroup_on_subnet) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for EB on subnet 192.168.0.251: found. [2013/07/15 16:39:26, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:170(find_workgroup_on_subnet) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for EB on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2013/07/15 1...