search for: nmbd_winsserv

...trunc=No auth=No header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=1 question: q_name=WLADEK<20> q_type=32 q_class=1 additional: nmb_name=WLADEK<20> rr_type=32 rr_class=1 ttl=300000 additional 0 char ....C hex 2000C0A80143 [2010/03/23 11:34:17, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_refresh_request(859) wins_process_name_refresh_request: Name refresh for name WLADEK<20> IP 192.168.1.67 [2010/03/23 11:34:17, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:reply_netbios_packet(947) reply_netbios_packet: sending a reply of packet type: wins_reg WLADEK<20> to ip 192....

...9;ve also included a dump from testparm following the log file. # nmbd.log: [2003/05/28 22:41:41, 2] nmbd/nmbd_browsesync.c:sync_with_dmb(157) sync_with_dmb: Initiating sync with domain master browser FIDELITY<20> at IP 192.168.0.1 for workgroup HOME.LAN [2003/05/28 22:41:41, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_refresh_request(430) wins_process_name_refresh_request: Name refresh for name DRUMMSW01<03> IP 192.168.0.96 [2003/05/28 22:41:41, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_refresh_request(430) wins_process_name_refresh_request: Name refresh for name DRUMMSW01&...

...same name of computer. In wins-servers wins.dat i see next string: "GRAND#20" 1044171787 192.168.1.1 192.168.2.1 46R It's ok. But for ALL mashines in any interfaces with any IP (192.168.1.X or 192.168.2.X) returned first IP in list: ------------------ [2003/01/30 11:03:21, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1353) wins_process_name_query: name query for name GRAND<20> from IP 192.168.2.129 [2003/01/30 11:03:21, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1398) wins_process_name_query: name query for name GRAND<20> returning first IP 192....

...an time period? Second question: Why does samba don't make an dns lookup after mnblookup was failed? Here some interesting facts about the log.nmbd: DNS successfull: wins_process_name_query: name query for name FILESERVER<00> from IP 192.168.1.10 [2007/02/09 01:35:06, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1956) wins_process_name_query: name query for name FILESERVER<00> not found - doing dns lookup. [2007/02/09 01:35:06, 3] nmbd/asyncdns.c:queue_dns_query(310) added DNS query for FILESERVER<00> [2007/02/09 01:35:06, 3] nmbd/asyncdns.c:add_dns_result...

....16.1.1 ttl=0 nb_flags=40 to subnet REMOTE_BROADCAST_SUBNET [1999/06/27 14:24:04, 3] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:add_name_to_subnet(250) add_name_to_subnet: Added netbios name __SAMBA__<00> with first IP 172.16.1.1 ttl=0 nb_flags=40 to subnet REMOTE_BROADCAST_SUBNET [1999/06/27 14:24:04, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_registration_request(658) wins_process_name_registration_request: Unique name registration for name SERVER<20> IP 172.16.1.1 [1999/06/27 14:24:04, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_registration_request(658) wins_process_name_registration_request: Unique nam...

...es that showed me what was happening. If I try to ping an address on the old domain from a windows workstation, in this example, "ping ns-updates", I see the following in log.nmbd: (ignore the timestamps as I have patched logs together to get this info) [2004/06/23 13:56:49, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1485) wins_process_name_query: name query for name NS-UPDATES<00> from IP 10.239.10.38 [2004/06/23 13:56:49, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1549) wins_process_name_query: name query for name NS-UPDATES<00> not found -...

I've just fixed a bug (#528 in bugzilla) to do with wins hook functionality. The wins hook parameter is broken in Samba 3.0.0 but will be fixed in 3.0.1. The attached patch against the release samba-3.0.0.tar.gz file can be used to fix it. Tim. -------------- next part -------------- Index: nmbd_winsserver.c =================================================================== RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c,v retrieving revision 1.51.2.12 retrieving revision 1.51.2.14 diff -c -u -r1.51.2.12 -r1.51.2.14 cvs server: conflicting specifications of output style --- source/nmbd/nmb...

...nmbd_synclists.c:302(complete_sync) sync with CLIENTE(192.168.20.2) for workgroup FOOBAR completed (1 records) ...... [2012/08/24 11:47:56, 2] nmbd/nmbd_synclists.c:302(complete_sync) sync with CLIENTE(0.0.0.0) for workgroup BAGOLIN completed (1 records) [2012/08/24 11:48:05, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:859(wins_process_name_refresh_request) wins_process_name_refresh_request: Name refresh for name BAGOLIN<1e> IP 192.168.20.2 [2012/08/24 11:48:05, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:859(wins_process_name_refresh_request) wins_process_name_refresh_request: Name refresh for name BAGOLIN&lt...

...e, however I'm not using it. Can someone explain the below error or tell me why it's showing up? Thanks, PhilY tail -f log.nmb [2001/01/02 11:50:20, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) process_logon_packet: Logon from 10.0.0.7: code = 0x7 [2001/01/02 11:51:10, 0] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_multihomed_name_re gistration_request(1029) wins_process_multihomed_name_registration_request: group name registration request received for name LEGAUX<00> from IP 10.0.0.7 on subnet WINS_SERVER_SUBNET. Errror - group names should not be multihomed. [2001/01/02 11:51:11,...

...lazy, I don't want to add this entry to all lmhost files. A name resolution by DNS is not possible since AA_BB is not a valid hostname and the resolver under FreeBSD discards it. So my solution is now a small hack to the nmbd on the WINS server which adds the IP address of AA_BB manually: *** nmbd_winsserver.c.ORI Sun Jun 14 19:04:45 1998 --- nmbd_winsserver.c Sun Jun 14 19:51:32 1998 *************** *** 126,131 **** --- 126,137 ---- add_samba_names_to_subnet(wins_server_subnet); + { struct in_addr ip; + ip = *interpret_addr2( "192.168.1.10" ); + add_name_to_subnet( win...

...ROUP, subnet UNICAST_SUBNET. [2009/06/05 17:33:17, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_wins(349) become_domain_master_browser_wins: querying WINS server from IP 192.168.1.100 for domain master browser name WORKGROUP<1b> on workgroup WORKGROUP [2009/06/05 17:33:17, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1892) wins_process_name_query: name query for name WORKGROUP<1b> from IP 192.168.1.100 [2009/06/05 17:33:17, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1944) wins_process_name_query: name query for name WORKGROUP<1b> returning first...

...name torpc8<0x20> bind succeeded on port 0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name torpc8<0x20> Connection to torpc8 failed Here is the enteries in log.nmb file: wins_process_name_query: name query for name TORPC8<20> from IP 127.0.0.1 [2001/02/21 19:28:17, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request( 1362) TORPC8 is a workstation with some shares. If I use "name resolve order = wins lmhosts host" it's work perfect. But I want to be sure that wins is working. Here is the smb.conf: [global] # interfaces = 127.0.0.1/8 10.5.1.12/255.255.0....

...e problem as far as I can and these are my observations, hopefully they may be usefull to someone in the know. Machine - Debian Stable/Backports samba_3.0.0final-0 1). It appears that 'winsserver_init' is picking up the old IP from /var/lib/samba/wins.dat --- [2003/12/05 14:46:24, 4] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:initialise_wins(362) initialise_wins: add name: F-LAPTOP-SJG#20 ttl = 161432 first IP 192.168.213.12 flags = 44 --- "F-LAPTOP-SJG#00" 1070797025 192.168.213.12 44R "F-LAPTOP-SJG#20" 1070797016 192.168.213.12 44R --- 2). When the machine is plugged onto the network it introd...

Hello, I'm getting these errors on a samba 2.2.8a wins server in a NT4 network: [2003/11/25 09:41:00, 0] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_multihomed_name_registration_request (1022) wins_process_multihomed_name_registration_request: group name registration request received for name DOMAIN<00> from IP 192.168.10.5 on subnet WINS_SERVER_SUBNET. Errror - group names should not be multihomed. [2003/11/25 09:41:02...

...ng problems with samba crashing when a share access is attempted. However, I also notice that the nmbd daemon isn't being started up properly (though its startup script, through init.d, shows it as starting up OK). The error that is being shown in the logs is: [2006/09/28 20:06:35, 0] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:initialise_wins(580) initialise_wins: failed to open wins.tdb. Error was Permission denied Now I've tried to google for wins.tdb and can't find much on it, other than it should be located in /var/lib/samba (which it isn't). Any ideas for where it might have gone (I haven't...

...ios-ns > gcc-fs1.netbios-ns: NBT UDP PACKET(137): WACK; POSITIVE; RESPONSE; UNICAST 10:46:06.312676 IP mead.netbios-ns > gcc-fs1.netbios-ns: NBT UDP PACKET(137): REGISTRATION; NEGATIVE; RESPONSE; UNICAST Part of the samba log 0.0.0.0.log related to filer #2 is: [2010/05/14 16:54:52, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_registration_request(1138) wins_process_name_registration_request: Group name registration for name UWT-15<00> IP 10.208.235.134 [2010/05/14 16:54:52, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_registration_request(1222) wins_process_name_registration_request: Addin...

...oup ACCESS, subnet UNICAST_SUBNET. [2004/02/10 08:32:38, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_wins(341) become_domain_master_browser_wins: querying WINS server from IP 192.168.0.100 for domain master browser name ACCESS<1b> on workgroup ACCESS [2004/02/10 08:32:38, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1445) wins_process_name_query: name query for name ACCESS<1b> from IP 192.168.0.100 [2004/02/10 08:32:38, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1497) wins_process_name_query: name query for name ACCESS<1b> returning first IP 19...

...ded up being an acutal bug, er bad code segment. To explain we have a large number of clients ~1000+ at any one time over 6 subnets. Browsing was spuratic at best. nmbd sucked up %70 of the proccessing power of a sparc 5. Well after serious investigation I traced it down to two lines of code in nmbd_winsserver.c. in function initiate_wins_processing ... if(wins_server_subnet->namelist_changed) wins_write_database(); ... My first hack worked. I commented them out. Processing time went down to >1% and responce time probably went up by at least 20X. Browsing works better than I have ever...

...Yes trunc=No auth=No header: rcode=0 qdcount=1 ancount=0 nscount=0 arcount=1 question: q_name=FREEDOM<20> q_type=32 q_class=1 additional: nmb_name=FREEDOM<20> rr_type=32 rr_class=1 ttl=0 additional 0 char ...... hex 0000C0A80002 [2003/01/22 20:55:37, 10] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:packet_is_for_wins_server(95) packet_is_for_wins_server: failing WINS test #1. [2003/01/22 20:55:37, 3] nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_registration_request(237) process_name_registration_request: Name registration for name FREEDOM<20> IP 192.168.0.2 on subnet 192.168.0.2 [2...

...nt. After all I gave up and established plain sql accounts within the MS-SQL server to keep it working, however, single-sign-on is gone :(. When I try to use the "Use NT-Authentification" at a client nmbd.log is comming up with following lines: - ---cut--- [2005/05/31 17:49:37, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1354) wins_process_name_query: name query for name MEDICAL<1c> from IP 10.0.0.3 [2005/05/31 17:49:37, 3] nmbd/nmbd_winsserver.c:wins_process_name_query_request(1399) wins_process_name_query: name query for name MEDICAL<1c> returning first IP 10.0....