search for: nlewycky

I'm seeing this new build failure, starting some time yesterday on ARM: make[3]: Entering directory `/home/nlewycky/llvm/tools/llvmc/driver' llvm[3]: Linking Debug executable llvmc g++ -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_1=Base -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_2=Clang -I/home/nlewycky/llvm/include -I/home/nlewycky/llvm/tools/llvmc/driver -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -g -fPIC -Woverloaded...

Nick Lewycky wrote: > I'm seeing this new build failure, starting some time yesterday on ARM: > > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/nlewycky/llvm/tools/llvmc/driver' > llvm[3]: Linking Debug executable llvmc > g++ -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_1=Base -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_2=Clang -I/home/nlewycky/llvm/include -I/home/nlewycky/llvm/tools/llvmc/driver -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -g -fPIC -W...

2009/6/30 Andrew Haley <aph at redhat.com> > Nick Lewycky wrote: > > I'm seeing this new build failure, starting some time yesterday on ARM: > > > > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/nlewycky/llvm/tools/llvmc/driver' > > llvm[3]: Linking Debug executable llvmc > > g++ -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_1=Base -DLLVMC_BUILTIN_PLUGIN_2=Clang > -I/home/nlewycky/llvm/include -I/home/nlewycky/llvm/tools/llvmc/driver > -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -D__STDC_CONSTANT...

...'t catch it. Maybe the %4 >> operand is actually an instruction in another function? >> >> I'll try to reproduce this and fix the verifier to catch it. >> >> Nick >> >> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Nick Lewycky >> <nlewycky at google.com <mailto:nlewycky at google.com> >> <mailto:nlewycky at google.com <mailto:nlewycky at google.com>>> wrote: >> >> On 5 May 2010 17:12, Adarsh Yoga <ayoga at umail.iu.edu >> <mailto:ayoga at umail.iu.edu> &gt...

...lto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Marshall Clow Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2012 5:26 PM To: Nick Lewycky Cc: lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu; clang-dev Developers; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Bay Area LLVM Social - July On Jul 10, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com<mailto:nlewycky at google.com>> wrote: On 25 June 2012 13:40, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com<mailto:nlewycky at google.com>> wrote: Thanks for pointing this out. Let's hold the July one on the 12th. As advertised, this month's meeting will be held t...

...management hasn't asked you not to. Just like every llvm social! If you wouldn't mind RSVP'ing on http://llvmbayarea.appspot.com , that will help me get us the right sized space at the restaurant. Looking forward to seeing everyone there! Nick On 1 August 2012 13:36, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > On 31 July 2012 14:18, Kipping, David <dkipping at qualcomm.com> wrote: > >> First Thursday in August is this Thursday – will the Bay Area social >> going to take place that day? >> > > Tomorrow has a couple conflicts with sports even...

...how you managed to do > this, and how the verifier didn't catch it. Maybe the %4 operand is actually > an instruction in another function? > > I'll try to reproduce this and fix the verifier to catch it. > > Nick > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com >> <mailto:nlewycky at google.com>> wrote: >> >> On 5 May 2010 17:12, Adarsh Yoga <ayoga at umail.iu.edu >> <mailto:ayoga at umail.iu.edu>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've written a pass that b...

..., and how the verifier didn't catch it. Maybe the %4 > operand is actually an instruction in another function? > > I'll try to reproduce this and fix the verifier to catch it. > > Nick > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Nick Lewycky > <nlewycky at google.com <mailto:nlewycky at google.com> > <mailto:nlewycky at google.com <mailto:nlewycky at google.com>>> wrote: > > On 5 May 2010 17:12, Adarsh Yoga <ayoga at umail.iu.edu > <mailto:ayoga at umail.iu.edu> > &lt...

Currently llvm-dwarfdump isn't very useful on ELF .o files because it doesn't apply relocations. nlewycky at ducttape:~$ llvm-dwarfdump helloworld.o | grep debug_str\\[ 0x0000000c: DW_AT_producer [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x00000000] = "clang version 3.2 (trunk 163034)") 0x00000012: DW_AT_name [DW_FORM_strp] ( .debug_str[0x00000000] = "clang version 3.2 (trunk 163034)") 0x...

...Clow > *Sent:* Thursday, July 12, 2012 5:26 PM > *To:* Nick Lewycky > *Cc:* lldb-dev at cs.uiuc.edu; clang-dev Developers; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > *Subject:* Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Bay Area LLVM Social - July**** > > ** ** > > On Jul 10, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote:**** > > On 25 June 2012 13:40, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote:**** > > Thanks for pointing this out. Let's hold the July one on the 12th.**** > > ** ** > > As advertised, this month's meeting will be held this Thursday, at...

...LLVM IR more than a compiler IR? Have we made progress on moving to git? And how does the greedy allocator work anyways? This month's LLVM social is happening today, at 7pm in a new location! I'm looking forward to seeing everyone there! Nick On 28 September 2011 15:20, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > If you're in the bay area next week and would like to socialize with > your peers in an environment where talk about LLVM is encouraged, then > you should come to the LLVM Bay-Area Social! > > The next LLVM bay-area social will be Wednesday, Oct 5th, b...

If you're in the bay area next week and would like to socialize with your peers in an environment where talk about LLVM is encouraged, then you should come to the LLVM Bay-Area Social! The next LLVM bay-area social will be Wednesday, Oct 5th, but at a new location! Yard House in San Jose isn't the most transit accessible, so we'd appreciate anyone willing to drive others. On the plus

I wish I was in bay area. :-) 2011/10/5 Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> > Is LLVM IR more than a compiler IR? Have we made progress on moving to git? > And how does the greedy allocator work anyways? > > This month's LLVM social is happening today, at 7pm in a new location! I'm > looking forward to seeing everyone there! > &...

On 6/20/2012 11:55 PM, Ashok Nalkund wrote: > On 6/20/2012 11:00 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote: >> On 06/21/12 12:47 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com >>> <mailto:nlewycky at google.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs >>> to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't >>> have a recent eno...

It's a new month already, and with a new month comes a new LLVM social! If you're in the bay area on Wednesday, December 7th, join your peers at St. Stephen's Green in Mountain View starting at 7pm and running until 11pm-ish, usually. This is walking distance from the Mountain View Caltrain and VTA stations, and they'll have great beer, drinks, and tasty food. As is the norm,

On 6/20/2012 11:00 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote: > On 06/21/12 12:47 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com >> <mailto:nlewycky at google.com>> wrote: >> >> Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs >> to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't >> have a recent enough cmake in their most...

Yes. Intially the pass was crashing when the module when the module verifier was running. I was able to solve that and now it is crashing when the bit writer pass is running. On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > On 5 May 2010 17:12, Adarsh Yoga <ayoga at umail.iu.edu> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've written a pass that basically does some code transformations to >> enable parallel execution of loops. After the transformation llvm runs >&gt...

Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build system doesn't implement? If nobody pipes up, I might actually try actually removing it! Nick -------------- next part

All things LLVM are welcome at LLVM bay-area social, happening this Thursday at Tied House in Mountain View starting at 7pm. Those details are repeated on the website, http://llvmbayarea.appspot.com where you are encouraged to register your interest, so I can let Tied House know how many people are coming. There won't be an LLVM bay-area social in January (at least, I'm not planning one

On Jun 20, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Nick Lewycky <nlewycky at google.com> wrote: > Is there anybody who is certain that our autoconf dependency needs to stay around? Are there developers stuck on systems that don't have a recent enough cmake in their most recent release, or maybe are using some features from configure+make that the cmake build s...