search for: nix4me

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 25 matches for "nix4me".

Did you mean: fixme
2004 Jul 21
4
shaping passive ftp traffic
Hi, I have tried unsuccesfully to limit my ftp server send speed in linux. I have an ipcop linux firewall/router with 2 nics. 1 nic (eth1) is connected to a 3mbit/384Kbit cable connection and the other (eth0) a switch. Behind it i have a suse linux box and a windows box. On the suse box i run proftpd. I need to shape my passive ftp send speed to 34KBytes because if it is maxed out at 45K
2005 Nov 05
3
ftp shaping and excluding ls packets
Hi, I am currently using a script to shape my outbound ftp traffic. Works great except for 1 thing. When a user goes to list a dir, the listing is also getting shaped. This causes dir listings to be very slow. Is there a way to differentiate the dir listing packets? Here is a my current script: #!/bin/bash #shaping passive and active outbound ftp traffic on an internal computer without
2006 Mar 04
3
my shaping rules wont work on nat box
I am currently running the following script on an internal machine to shape outbound ftp and email traffic. I am trying to move the script to my nat router (ipcop with 2 nic cards) so that it shapes the whole network and not only the outbound of 1 box. I have cable modem -> ipcop (eth1) >(eth0 - 192.168.1.1) > 192.168.1.100 and 192.168.1.101. The scripts works great running on
2004 Nov 24
17
outbound shaping
Well it appears i have no clue what im doing. I thought i had the below script working to shape outbound ftp traffic....however, it is shaping inbound traffic too. I have NO clue why. Please comment if anyone has any ideas why this doesnt work. I want to shape only outbound ftp traffic and not inbound or lan traffic. #!/bin/bash #shaping passive and active outbound ftp traffic on an
2004 Jul 28
1
shaping marked packets
Hi, I am trying to figure out how to shape the following marked packets and limit them to a speed on 30KBytes. I have read the documentation but I am unsue of what to do. iptables -t mangle -A FTP-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:51000 -j MARK --set-mark 1 Mark _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc
2004 Oct 08
3
shaping outbound ftp traffic
>In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >YOu''re not doing any other sort of Ingress filters are you?? No >I dont care about destination port. That line was commented. BUT, incoming transfers are being shaped for some reason. >Could this be shaping on the ISP side?? What >happens when the tc rules >are shut off?? No, everything works fine
2007 Nov 24
1
compatibility
Forgive me if this has been answered, but I searched the list, and the compatibility page on the nut site is unclear to me. Is the APC Back-UPS ES 500 compatible with nut? thank you chopp
2005 Feb 16
1
ubuntu
Is there a way to find out if QoS is enabled in the Ubuntu Linux Kernel? I am considering trying it but I would like to know if QoS is enabled before I try it. Thanks, Mark _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2004 Aug 05
1
marking passive ftp and shaping
I am trying to mark outbound passive ftp traffic with iptables and shape it to 35KBytes. I am using the following script on the computer that runs the ftp server. It is not working correctly, it seems to limit ALL traffic. Cant file share or anything. Anyone might know what is wrong? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic # mark the outbound passive ftp packets on ports 50000-51000
2006 Mar 05
0
revised shaping rules, please take a look
...a nutshell. This should shape outbound ftp to 105kpbs. If I download, the ACK packets should go to the front of the que. If I send a large email, the email should borrow speed from the ftp. Web surfing should be snappy and ssh also beacuse they are in the higher priority que. Any comments? nix4me
2004 Oct 06
1
shape outbound ftp with 1 nic
Hi, I am using the following script to limit my outbound traffic. This scipt runs on a box behind my firewall. It limits my outbound passive ftp traffic to 39K perfectly....just like i want. However, i just noticed that it is also limiting uploads coming to my server. Is there something I can change to make it not limit uploads to my server? #!/bin/bash #shaping passive ftp traffic # mark the
2004 Jul 23
2
marking and shaping outbound passive ftp traffic
Will the following rules work to mark and shape OUTBOUND ftp speed (passive ftp ports 50000-60000) on my linux server? I want to be able to run these commands on the actual computer that is running the ftp server. iptables -t mangle -N MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -I POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MYSHAPER-OUT iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --dport 50000:60000 -j MARK --set-mark 1 tc
2005 Nov 27
1
refining my rules
Hi, I am currently using the following script to shape traffic on my linux box. I am getting ready to move the script to my linux firewall box so it shapes traffic for my home lan. I am looking to refine my rules a bit so to make bandwidth sharing a bit more efficient. Specifically I am looking to give out bound email more priority so that when a large email is sent, I want it to borrow all
2004 Oct 07
2
shaping outbound ftp traffic on 1 nic not working properly
>Theory is.. You can only shape outbound traffic. Inbound is via tcp windowshaping etc.. In theory yes, but it is shaping inbound transfers to my server. >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --sport 65437 -j MARK --set-mark 20 >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -p tcp --sport 50000:51000 -j MARK --set-mark 20 >> iptables -t mangle -A MYSHAPER-OUT -m mark --mark 0
2004 Aug 21
5
Wondershaper in internal network
I''ve gotten wondershaper to work in my linux box, which is part of a 3 computer network that shares the same dsl connection. The linuxbox handles most bulk down and uploading, and the other 2 are mainly for surfing and such. What I need from wiondershaper is that it should perform it''s tasks with all of the traffic to the dsl modem, but do nothing with the internal traffic
2006 Mar 05
0
tweaked shaping rules
I wanted to post my new shaping rules which I am running on my IPCOP router. They seem to be working very well so far. Any comments to my setup would be appreciated. #!/bin/bash # clear out the chain and setup a new chain iptables -t mangle -D OUTPUT -o eth1 -j BW-OUT 2> /dev/null > /dev/null iptables -t mangle -F BW-OUT 2> /dev/null > /dev/null iptables -t mangle -X BW-OUT 2>
2005 Nov 27
1
shaping outboaud email
Hi, I thought sending email went out on port 25? When I look with ethereal, outbound email transfers were on port 58020. I assume it''s choosing a random port for transfer? If so how do I tag it with iptables mark? I was hoping it was as simple as tagging port 25. Thanks, Mark
2004 Oct 12
0
help with outbound shaping on 1 nic
Hi, I have been reading the lartc docs and I am a bit confused. I am trying to do the following: I have 3 computers. A linux router and 2 clients. On one of the clients I run linux and I have a ftp server using passive mode. I want to run traffic shaping on the linux client. It has 1 nic. I want to shape the outbound ftp traffic to 40 KBytes because my cable connection is 45K. I have
2004 Oct 23
0
pyshaper
Has anyone used a program called ''pyshaper''? It looks interesting and I am thinking of trying it. Just wanted to see if anyone had success with this traffic shaping utility. Mark _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
2004 Nov 21
0
script to shape outbound passive/active ftp traffic
Hi, I just wanted to share my script with the list. I have been trying to shape outbound passive and active ftp traffic without affecting inbound and lan transfers. I have tried to do this for a long time and it seems that I have finally figured it out. Feel free to comment on the below script if there is anything that can be improved. It seems to work flawlessly so far. #!/bin/bash