Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "nispom".
2005 Sep 03
1
Loggin of authorized keys
...stand that this has come up before and has generally been denied
on the basis that the comment field is arbitrary user input that
shouldn't be trusted.
I agree, but...
I cannot stress strongly enough that this kind of auditing record is a
requirement for any system operating under CAPP and/or NISPOM auditing
guidelines. These guidelines are required in security-sensitive
environments, and they both require that logins need to be tied to a
specific authorized user... not just an unspecified user who happens to
be authorized.
Since we both agree that the comment field isn't trustworthy, I...
2017 May 31
2
CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 5/31/2017 8:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> I've got an old RAID that I attached to a box. LSI card, and the RAID
>> has 12 drives, for a total RAID size of 9.1TB, I think. I started shred
>> /dev/sda the Friday before last... and it's still running. Is this
>> reasonable for it to be taking this long...?
>
> not at all
2017 May 31
0
CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID
...n my name to a certificate that gets
> stuck on the outside of the server, meaning I, personally, am responsible
> for the sanitization of the drive(s).
the DoD multipass erase procedure is long obsolete and deprecated. It
was based on MFM and RLL technology prevalent in the mid 1980s. NISPOM
2006-5220 replaced it in 2006, and says "DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL/SECRET
INFORMATION PHYSICALLY".
http://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/16130-The-Urban-Legend-of-Multipass-Hard-Disk-Overwrite.html
http://www.dss.mil/documents/odaa/nispom2006-5220.pdf
from that blog,...
> Fortunately,...
2017 May 31
3
CentOS 6.9, shredding a RAID
...ficate that
>> gets stuck on the outside of the server, meaning I, personally, am
>> responsible for the sanitization of the drive(s).
>
> the DoD multipass erase procedure is long obsolete and deprecated. It
> was based on MFM and RLL technology prevalent in the mid 1980s. NISPOM
> 2006-5220 replaced it in 2006, and says "DESTROY CONFIDENTIAL/SECRET
> INFORMATION PHYSICALLY".
>
> http://www.infosecisland.com/blogview/16130-The-Urban-Legend-of-Multipass-Hard-Disk-Overwrite.html
> http://www.dss.mil/documents/odaa/nispom2006-5220.pdf
>
> from th...