search for: nimbl

NIMBLE version 0.6-2 has been released on CRAN and at r-nimble.org. NIMBLE is a system that allows you to: - Write general hierarchical statistical models in BUGS code and create a corresponding model object to use in R. - Build Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), particle filters, Monte Carlo Expectat...

NIMBLE version 0.6-2 has been released on CRAN and at r-nimble.org. NIMBLE is a system that allows you to: - Write general hierarchical statistical models in BUGS code and create a corresponding model object to use in R. - Build Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), particle filters, Monte Carlo Expectat...

Hi folks, A new release of Prawn is out, with some bug fixes and a couple backported features from edge. This release is API-compatible with 0.2.0, so please do upgrade! Release notes at: http://blog.majesticseacreature.com/archives/2008.10/prawn_0_2_1-2.html Enjoy! -greg -- Technical Blaag at: http://blog.majesticseacreature.com | Non-tech stuff at: http://metametta.blogspot.com

Please excuse if this isn''t the right forum - I didn''t see any mention of a better list - please advise if there is somewhere else I should send this. My employer is seeking a contractor for some Ruby/Rails work. Please e-mail me directly at peters <at> nimble.com.au if you are interested and available at short notice. I''ll provide further details as we flesh them out. Regards, Peter Sumskas. Nimble Systems Pty Ltd. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/att...

...inal top-level NEWS file" CITATION "inst/CITATION - the CITATION file from the source package's inst directory" Several CRAN packages have both NEWS and inst/NEWS (gdata, genetics, gplots, mcgibbsit, modeltools, nimble, RRF, session, SII). In most the two files are identical but in RRF and nimble they differ. Is the manual wrong is the code wrong? Bill Dunlap TIBCO Software wdunlap tibco.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have an original-label Infrant (now NetGear) ReadyNAS storage appliance that's been running for 8+ years. Except for replacing its power supply, it has not skipped a beat in all this time. I use it primarily as a backup device (via NFS) for a couple of Linux machines, (via SMB) for a couple of Windows PC's, and (via ftp) for web sites at my hosting provider. SMART+ reporting shows

...controllers with shared > writeback cache... you pretty much have to get into EMC class > hardware for this level of reliability with data integrity and > performance. and thats /really/ expensive stuff. Yes it is, because it really is that hard to do shared writeback cache. EMC, Nimble, NetApp, and the like cost what they do because of those HA features. EMC storage processors have specialized shared backplanes and replicated write caches just in case an SP goes down while the data to be written is in cache and has yet to be committed (so that the trespassing SP can write t...

...e processor to do the work. Now, the drive is still doing some basic ECC on the sector, but the storage processor is getting a much better idea of the health of each sector than when the drive's firmware is managing remap. Sophisticated enterprise arrays, like NetApp's, EMC's, and Nimble's, can do some very accurate predictions and proactive hotsparing when needed. That's part of what you pay for when you buy that sort of array. But the other fact of life of modern consumer-level hard drives is that *errored sectors are expected* and not exceptions. Why else would a...

...alize that my skills are limited and dated. But I still can learn relatively quickly. It's just that I seem to fit the profile I read long ago: younger folks grasp, retain and more quickly recall details while older folks tend to grasp, integrate and apply concepts more quickly without being as nimble about the details of things. > > Akemi > <snip sig stuff> -- Bill

...so it stands to reason you'll need really beefy hardware.? I don't think you can do what you seem to need on budget hardware. Personally, and solely based on this thread alone, if I was building this in-house, I'd get a decent server cluster together and build a FC or iSCSI SAN to a Nimble storage array with Flash/SSD front ends and large HDDs in the back end.? This solves virtually all your problems.? The servers will have tiny SSD boot drives (which I prefer over booting from the SAN) and then everything else gets handled by the storage back-end. In effect this is how our mai...

...ic, so it stands to reason you'll need really beefy hardware. I don't think you can do what you seem to need on budget hardware. Personally, and solely based on this thread alone, if I was building this in-house, I'd get a decent server cluster together and build a FC or iSCSI SAN to a Nimble storage array with Flash/SSD front ends and large HDDs in the back end. This solves virtually all your problems. The servers will have tiny SSD boot drives (which I prefer over booting from the SAN) and then everything else gets handled by the storage back-end. >> >> If SSDs not suit...

...ed really beefy hardware.? I don't think >> you can do what you seem to need on budget hardware. Personally, and >> solely based on this thread alone, if I was building this in-house, >> I'd get a decent server cluster together and build a FC or iSCSI SAN >> to a Nimble storage array with Flash/SSD front ends and large HDDs in >> the back end.? This solves virtually all your problems.? The servers >> will have tiny SSD boot drives (which I prefer over booting from the >> SAN) and then everything else gets handled by the storage back-end. >...

...stem's culture. "There really is a culture in the Linux community of contributing components," said Donald Becker, a staff scientist at Goddard. "Working with a culture like that makes everyone's job easier." Collective development and troubleshooting make Linux both a nimble and uncommonly stable operating system, proponents say. The drawback, Mr. Becker said, is that Linux is always changing, requiring users to update frequently. "But the alternative, is a stagnant system," he said, "so it's a necessary evil." The free software model, for a...

...crime statistics, schools, lifestyles, neighborhoods and more • Working in an Agile, TDD environment writing code you can be proud of • Keeping existing products up-to-date with the latest technologies, architectures, and standards • Helping build a nimble engineering team with potential path to CTO • Collaborating with PhD Geographers and Statisticians to create new, disruptive products What’s In it For You? • Major opportunity to build your own team with potential path to CTO position • Casual f...

...ic, so it stands to reason you'll need really beefy hardware. I don't think you can do what you seem to need on budget hardware. Personally, and solely based on this thread alone, if I was building this in-house, I'd get a decent server cluster together and build a FC or iSCSI SAN to a Nimble storage array with Flash/SSD front ends and large HDDs in the back end. This solves virtually all your problems. The servers will have tiny SSD boot drives (which I prefer over booting from the SAN) and then everything else gets handled by the storage back-end. If SSDs not suitable for RAID usa...

I'm adding feature to detect customized pragma and mark those region in LLVM IR using Metadata. I want to let programmer give additional directives to compiler. So I put some functions, variables, and 'cout' on clang. So, based on my understanding on your comment, it may be natural to have long compilation time. My machine has Intel Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz * 8 with 8GM RAM, which

Hi, over time the requirements and possibilities regarding filesystems changed for our users. currently I'm faced with the question: What might be a good way to provide one big filesystem for a few users which could also be enlarged; backuping the data is not the question. Big in that context is up to couple of 100 TB may be. O.K. I could install one hardware raid with e.g. N big drives

It's been suggested I use R, I suppose because my employer is too skint to pay for a copy of Splus. But.... it doesn't seem to be stable. I was trying to do some ordinary regression and stepping through a model. I was trying to set up a model ('kitchen_sink') in which to put all my model parameters. Then I wanted to use step() to see what it would reduce the model to. I

I hate top posting, but since you've got two items I want to comment on, I'll suck it up for now. Having SSDs alone will give you great performance regardless of filesystem.? BTRFS isn't going to impact I/O any more significantly than, say, XFS.? It does have serious stability/data integrity issues that XFS doesn't have.? There's no reason not to use SSDs for storage of

Hi list, I've a notebook with C7 (1511). This notebook has 2 disk (640 GB) and I've configured them with MD at level 1. Some days ago I've noticed some critical slowdown while opening applications. First of all I've disabled acpi on disks. I've checked disk for badblocks 4 consecutive times for disk sda and sdb and I've noticed a strange behaviour. On sdb there are