search for: nikyer

...features.shard: on cluster.min-free-disk: 10% performance.cache-max-file-size: 1048576 performance.client-io-threads: on The test started at ~8:50 AM server time. Attaching mnt and rebalance logs. Looking forward for your advice! Thanks, Nikita 2018-02-05 14:32 GMT+02:00 Nikita Yeryomin <nikyer at gmail.com>: > Hello Nithya! > Thank you so much, I think we are close to build a stable storage solution > according to your recommendations. Here's our rebalance log - please don't > pay attention to error messages after 9AM - this is when we manually > destroyed volu...

...gt;> remove-brick has not been run? There is no need to run a fix-layout after >> using "remove-brick start" as that will automatically rebalance data. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> Nithya >> >> On 5 February 2018 at 14:06, Nikita Yeryomin <nikyer at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Attached the log. There are some errors in it like >>> >>> [2018-02-04 18:50:41.112962] E [fuse-bridge.c:903:fuse_getattr_resume] >>> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 9613852: GETATTR 140712792330896 >>> (7d39d329-c0e0-4997-85e6-0e6...

...rage. I do see the number of bricks reducing in the graphs.Are you sure a remove-brick has not been run? There is no need to run a fix-layout after using "remove-brick start" as that will automatically rebalance data. Regards, Nithya On 5 February 2018 at 14:06, Nikita Yeryomin <nikyer at gmail.com> wrote: > Attached the log. There are some errors in it like > > [2018-02-04 18:50:41.112962] E [fuse-bridge.c:903:fuse_getattr_resume] > 0-glusterfs-fuse: 9613852: GETATTR 140712792330896 > (7d39d329-c0e0-4997-85e6-0e66e0436315) resolution failed > > But when...

...ucing in the graphs.Are you sure a > remove-brick has not been run? There is no need to run a fix-layout after > using "remove-brick start" as that will automatically rebalance data. > > > > Regards, > Nithya > > On 5 February 2018 at 14:06, Nikita Yeryomin <nikyer at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Attached the log. There are some errors in it like >> >> [2018-02-04 18:50:41.112962] E [fuse-bridge.c:903:fuse_getattr_resume] >> 0-glusterfs-fuse: 9613852: GETATTR 140712792330896 >> (7d39d329-c0e0-4997-85e6-0e66e0436315) resolution fa...

Please help troubleshooting glusterfs with the following setup: Distributed volume without replication. Sharding enabled. # cat /etc/centos-release CentOS release 6.9 (Final) # glusterfs --version glusterfs 3.12.3 [root at master-5f81bad0054a11e8bf7d0671029ed6b8 uploads]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gv0 Type: Distribute Volume ID: 1a7e05f6-4aa8-48d3-b8e3-300637031925 Status:

Please help troubleshooting glusterfs with the following setup: Distributed volume without replication. Sharding enabled. [root at master-5f81bad0054a11e8bf7d0671029ed6b8 uploads]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gv0 Type: Distribute Volume ID: 1a7e05f6-4aa8-48d3-b8e3-300637031925 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 27 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: