search for: nigro

Hi! I'm currently using Tinc to create a VPN between a Linux server, a Windows server, and my local laptop and desktop computers (both running Windows). I picked an IP in the 10.123.1.x range for each server, and added something like "Subnet = 10.123.1.1/32" to each host config file. It's working very well! What I'd like to do now is expose an extra subnet to the VPN. The

...a route on the Windows machines: route add 192.168.122.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.123.1.4 (where 10.123.1.4 is the local IP on the Tinc interface) I was hoping that Tinc would automatically configure the routing tables, but configuring it manually is fine. On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 11:10 PM Daniel Lo Nigro <lists at d.sb> wrote: > Hi! > > I'm currently using Tinc to create a VPN between a Linux server, a Windows > server, and my local laptop and desktop computers (both running Windows). I > picked an IP in the 10.123.1.x range for each server, and added something > like &...

On 6/12/18 11:45 am, Daniel Lo Nigro wrote: > I worked this out - I just had to manually add a route on the Windows > machines: > > route add 192.168.122.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.123.1.4 > > (where 10.123.1.4 is the local IP on the Tinc interface) > I was hoping that Tinc would automatically configure the routing...

I just encountered a weird issue on my servers - Tinc was using a constant 10-50% CPU on several servers, and these servers were also receiving a constant ~3 Mb/s of data over the Tinc interface, which is usually otherwise pretty quiet. Example: https://d.sb/2019/04/firefox_11-15.54.22.png Grafana dashboard: https://dash.d.sb/dashboard/snapshot/6nWZqagpgxzxUrybDZkNbF6JSflLlKmO?orgId=1 This seems

When I install Tinc 1.1pre17 on Debian (from the 1.1~pre17-1.1 package in experimental), I hit the following error: Error while decrypting: error:060A7094:digital envelope routines:EVP_EncryptUpdate:invalid operation I tried compiling Tinc myself from the Debian source, and still hit the same issue. 1.0 works fine, but I'd like to upgrade to 1.1 Any ideas on how to fix it? I'm using

Thanks Peter. I saw that bug report and actually posted a comment on it. I think I may have some software that depends on OpenSSL 1.1.1b so I can't downgrade it. On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 7:25 AM Peter Whisker <peter at whisker.org.uk> wrote: > Hi Daniel > > This is all I can see about this out there - it seems to be a problem > brought about by OpenSSL 1.1.1b and the