search for: nic2

...ory is this, I''m running an Unreal Tournament 2004 server. It''s running on a system that has two external NICs that are connected to different ISPs. I would like players to be able to connect to the server from either link. My default gateway goes through NIC1. For traffic through NIC2 to work I simply added an extra routing table and rule. The extra routing table has the default gateway for NIC2 in it and is triggered by packets that have a source address that matches the IP of NIC2. The problem I have is this, the server will listen on port 7777 and bind itself to INADDR_ANY...

...way to make it work. They communicate through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which doesn't allow me to route to the correct DC, and that is only part of the problem. Here is the configuration: * DC1.domain.local IP NIC1: 172.16.0.2 IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 IP VPN: 172.19.1.173 * DC2.domain.local IP NIC1: 192.168.0.1 IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 IP VPN: 172.19.1.174 Before joining DC2 to the AD, I set the entries of DC1 using his VPN IP both in /etc/hosts: 172.19.1.173 DC1 DC1.domain.local and in /etc/resolv.conf: search domain.local...

Once upon a time, mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> said: > This is that system with the missing management port, and I'm still > fighting it. Everything *looks* right: > > 3: enp6s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast > state UP group default qlen 1000 > link/ether 00:25:90:0a:42:87 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.0.100/24 brd

I add some additional information I didn't give in my previous email, specifically how I tried to force DC1 and DC2 to contact each other only with their VPN IPs. I did so using dnsmasq as a DNS proxy. # DC1 configuration IP NIC1: 172.16.0.2 IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 IP VPN: 172.19.1.173 --- /etc/resolv.conf: search domain.local domain domain.local nameserver 172.19.1.173 --- I configured dnsmasq to listen on the VPN interface 172.19.1.173 (while samba listen on all other interfaces, 172.16.0.1, 172.20.0.1 and lo 127.0.0.1) --- /etc/dnsmasq.conf:...

...nic1.gateway}|TYPE=bridge|PEERDNS=no|ONBOOT=yes +ifcfg=#{nic1.mac}|breth0|BOOTPROTO=#{nic1.boot_protocol}|IPADDR=#{nic1.ip_address}|NETMASK=#{nic1.netmask}|BROADCAST=#{nic1.broadcast}|GATEWAY=#{nic1.gateway}|TYPE=Bridge|PEERDNS=no|ONBOOT=yes ifcfg=#{nic1.mac}|eth0|BRIDGE=breth0|ONBOOT=yes -ifcfg=#{nic2.mac}|breth1|BOOTPROTO=#{nic2.boot_protocol}|TYPE=bridge|PEERDNS=no|ONBOOT=yes +ifcfg=#{nic2.mac}|breth1|BOOTPROTO=#{nic2.boot_protocol}|TYPE=Bridge|PEERDNS=no|ONBOOT=yes ifcfg=#{nic2.mac}|eth1|BRIDGE=breth1|ONBOOT=yes HERE @@ -116,7 +118,7 @@ ifcfg=#{nic2.mac}|eth1|BRIDGE=breth1|ONBOOT=yes...

I have a problem browsing in my subnets let me explain me situation: I have a m0n0wall (FreeBSD based router software) with 3 nics. nic1:My WAN connection Nic2:My LAN connection (192.168.0.0/24 m0n0 is DHCP) Nic3:My Wifi connenciot (192.168.1.0/24 m0n0 is DHCP) just using ip-adresses acrossed the network is no problem. now i want to use windows browsing works on LAN but can't see the computers in WiFi now i gave my samba server 2 nics (nic1:192.168...

Hi, is it possible to have 2 different ISP in one server? i have 2 NIC cards im going to config ISP1 in NIC1 and ISP2 in NIC2? what should be the configuration for this setup? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070412/4c62019f/attachment-0004.html>

This is that system with the missing management port, and I'm still fighting it. Everything *looks* right: 3: enp6s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:25:90:0a:42:87 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.0.100/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global enp6s0 ip route 192.168.0.0/24 dev enp6s0 proto kernel scope link

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 07:27:58PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Default Gateway IP : 192.168.0.100 > > Default Gateway MAC : 00:25:90:0a:42:87 > > No, that does not look right. You have configured the gateway of the > IPMI to be the host OS side of the NIC. You can't do that... in a lot > of systems I've seen, the IPMI side of the NIC can't even

...scritto: > I add some additional information I didn't give in my previous email, > specifically how I tried to force DC1 and DC2 to contact each other only > with their VPN IPs. > I did so using dnsmasq as a DNS proxy. > > # DC1 configuration > IP NIC1: 172.16.0.2 > IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 > IP VPN: 172.19.1.173 > > --- > /etc/resolv.conf: > search domain.local > domain domain.local > nameserver 172.19.1.173 > --- > > I configured dnsmasq to listen on the VPN interface 172.19.1.173 (while > samba listen on all other interfaces, 172.16.0.1,...

...to the > correct DC, and that is only part of the problem. Why are you doing this? It seems both confusing and unnecessary, as distinct hosts inside of your VPN they should have distinct IP addresses. > Here is the configuration: > * DC1.domain.local > IP NIC1: 172.16.0.2 > IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 > IP VPN: 172.19.1.173 > > * DC2.domain.local > IP NIC1: 192.168.0.1 > IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 > IP VPN: 172.19.1.174 > > Before joining DC2 to the AD, I set the entries of DC1 using his VPN IP > both in /etc/hosts: > 172.19.1.173 DC1 DC1.domain.local...

...make it persistent across reboots? Boris Epstein: I am using Hyper-V and its getting annoying lol Ok so here is how I have set everything up: my /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: # # reserved values # 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec # # local # #1 inr.ruhep 300 NIC1 310 NIC2 my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth0 file: 168.87.147.0/24 dev eth0 table 300 default via 168.87.147.1 dev eth0 table 300 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/route-eth1 file: 10.20.50.0/24 dev eth1 table 310 default via 10.20.50.1 dev eth1 table 310 My /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/rule-et...

Hi, Reward offered: 50$ (paypal), and I am sure this is a ridiculous thing I have missing. My goal: On a 2 NIC Asterisk box, to send packets that came in Asterisk on NIC1 back to NIC 1, and NIC2 back to NIC 2. (basically, send them back the same way they came from). I have been doing what was recommended to me and mangling packets left and right. I have reached a point where I am stuck, and can`t imagine why this last little step isnt working. As you know, Asterisk sends all packe...

Ok ive been trying to get this to work for about half a year now. Ive searched all over the internet for a solution for my problem. Ive found some solutions, but they only led me to yet more problems. What we want to do is the following: I live in a student complex with 7 other people. Every room has its own internet connection from the same ISP. Ip, gateway, subnet are asigned through dhcp on

I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable service is 192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is 192.168.0.254. I determine which service my computers communicate through by setting the gateway assignment to either of those addresses and it just works. I can connect to my computers from the outside by port forwarding from my routers to the computer that I

Hello there, What is the hypervisor that hosts the VM? What does ifconfig show on it? Boris. On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/06/2016 11:00 PM, Sean Son wrote: > >> How do I >> configure the networking so that both IPs are pingable and the VM is >> reachable via both IPs? >> > > > You need

hello all, I have been trying to set-up bridged network with VLAN and not able to succeed as many tutorials address only single NIC. I am trying to setup 2 guests (backtrack instance) each guest has NIC1 and NIC2. following is snippet for guest1 I am not able to get 192.168.0.2 address back on guest eth0. VIRT-MANAGER GUI : guest1-lan details radio button left side panel NIC1 ------------------> Virtual Network Interface Source Device : Virtual Network "default&quo...

...te through VPN and both have one of the bound interfaces set > to the same IP address, 172.20.0.1, which doesn't allow me to route to the > correct DC, and that is only part of the problem. > > Here is the configuration: > * DC1.domain.local > IP NIC1: 172.16.0.2 > IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 > IP VPN: 172.19.1.173 > > * DC2.domain.local > IP NIC1: 192.168.0.1 > IP NIC2: 172.20.0.1 > IP VPN: 172.19.1.174 > I don't think you really understand dns and AD =-O You cannot have two computers with the same IP (how would DNS differentiate betwe...

...+---n2-----(SA)----n1--+ | (SB) | +-------n3---+ Server B's smb.conf has: ... time server = yes domain master = no local master = yes preferred master = no wins server = <addr. of SA> security = SERVER password server = SA interfaces = <addr. of nic1>/255.255.255.240 <addr. of nic2>/24 remote announce = <n2>.255/WORKGROUP remote browse sync = <addr. of SA> ... On Server A it looks like: ... time server = yes domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes wins support = yes interfaces = <addr. of nic1>/24 <addr. of &l...

...AMD-V(IOMMU) capable and is enabled in the BIOS with 3 NICs. I currently have host Windows 2008 R2 installed but binds (network services and protocols) on NIC3 only. My guests on VMWare workstation (has bridged network service bound on all 3 NIC) has bridged 3 NICs for the guests where NIC1 is WAN, NIC2 is LAN1, and NIC3 is LAN2. One guest have access to all 3 NICs. Other guests would only have access to either NIC2 or NIC3. Is it possible to duplicate this in CentOS 6.2 (minimal install preferred) with open source virtualization (qemu-kvm/libvirt ?) ? I think I need to install the bridge-utils pa...