search for: nhaber

Hi, at the moment I see only packages named *2.2.26* on xi.dovecot.fi. Can we expect packages for v2.2.27 to appear there? -- Regards mks

Aki Tuomi, Fri, 02 Mar 2018 20:06:35 +0200: > the problem is default > ?protocols = imap pop3? Ah, OK. I wasn't aware that the default had changed. It seems to be protocols = imap pop3 lmtp now. > packaging should use > protocols = > protocols = $protocols imap Yep, explicitly setting protocols = before !include_try /usr/share/dovecot/protocols.d/*.protocol helps. IMO

There is some underlying problem with imap-login but in order to debug it I'd like to see a core file. On error dovecot reports "core not dumped". If I put "abort()" in the code at the point it is reporting then a core file is written, so there is no OS reason why a core can not be written. It appears to be dovecot's choice to control the child. In an attempt

On 19/03/2015 13:35, Markus Sch?nhaber wrote: >> dumped". If I put "abort()" in the code at the point it is reporting >> then a core file is written, so there is no OS reason why a core can not >> be written. It appears to be dovecot's choice to control the child. In >> an attempt to obtain...

Stephan Bosch, Mon, 25 Apr 2016 15:16:55 +0200: > Oops. Turned off package composer for maintenance, but didn't turn it > back on. > > It is building now..... Is there something to turn on to build packages in /debian/pool/wheezy-auto/dovecot-2.2 ? Or don't you provide packages for wheezy anymore? > Op 25-4-2016 om 14:47 schreef Harald Leithner: >> Hi, >>

Op 16-12-2016 om 10:30 schreef Markus Sch?nhaber: > Hi, > > at the moment I see only packages named *2.2.26* on xi.dovecot.fi. Can > we expect packages for v2.2.27 to appear there? Actually, there are packages there that have the 2.2.27 release in there, but they are not marked as such. Ever since the git move I haven't finishe...

Hi, looking at the source archive of pigeonhole 0.4.20 <https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole-0.4.20.tar.gz> I noticed that the contained ChangeLog mentions v0.4.20.rc1 as first entry and pigeonhole-version.h defines git revision 7cd71ba as version where I'd expect 4a55e6c. This is probably no big deal. But since Makefile.in and install-sh also differ (see

Op 8/31/2017 om 1:25 PM schreef Markus Sch?nhaber: > Hi, > > looking at the source archive of pigeonhole 0.4.20 > <https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole-0.4.20.tar.gz> > I noticed that the contained ChangeLog mentions v0.4.20.rc1 as first > entry and pigeonhole-version.h defines git revision 7cd...

Op 3/2/2018 om 8:58 PM schreef Markus Sch?nhaber: > Aki Tuomi, Fri, 02 Mar 2018 20:06:35 +0200: > >> the problem is default >> ?protocols = imap pop3? > Ah, OK. I wasn't aware that the default had changed. It seems to be > protocols = imap pop3 lmtp > now. > >> packaging should use >> protocols = >...

Hi! We are pleased to release Pigeonhole release v0.4.24.2 Tarball is available at https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole-0.4.24.2.tar.gz https://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole-0.4.24.2.tar.gz.sig Changes ------- * CVE-2019-11500: ManageSieve protocol parser does not properly handle NUL byte ? when scanning data in quoted strings, leading

the problem is default ?protocols = imap pop3? packaging should use protocols = protocols = $protocols imap etc. or you could? ---Aki TuomiDovecot oy -------- Original message --------From: Markus Sch?nhaber <dovecot at list-post.mks-mail.de> Date: 02/03/2018 19:44 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Debian: Dovecot 2.3.0.1 won't start if dovecot-pop3d is missing Hello, given a Debian 9 system with Dovecot 2.2.34 installed from self-built packages made from the official tarbal...

Hello, given a Debian 9 system with Dovecot 2.2.34 installed from self-built packages made from the official tarball combined with Stephan Bosch's debian files (upgraded multiple times from packages made in a similar way). Today, I updated this system to 2.3.0.1 from the official repository at repo.dovecot.org. After the update, dovecot wouldn't start because of: > dovecot: master: