Displaying 20 results from an estimated 31 matches for "nh2".
Did you mean:
nb2
2011 Apr 15
3
Rsquared for anova
I calculate an anova test in the following way:
expdata<-read.table("/home/dorien/UA/meta-music/optimuse/optimuse1-build-desktop/results/results_processedCP",
header=TRUE)
names(expdata)<-c('nh1','nh2','nh3','randsize','aweights','tt1','tt2','tt3','path','iters','type','length','tos','tws','time')
fit<-(aov(tos~nh1*nh2*nh3*randsize*aweights*tt1*tt2*tt3*iters*length,
data=expdata))
sum...
2017 Jan 27
1
Disallow binding via tinc
...arder to configure though and
easier to get wrong.
If I could avoid having the tun0, that would trivially solve the problem.
On 27/01/17 09:41, Azul wrote:
> Why not just firewall incoming traffic on the clients?
>
>
> On 27 Jan 2017 8:37 am, "Niklas Hambüchen" <mail at nh2.me
> <mailto:mail at nh2.me>> wrote:
>
> I'm looking for a way to add some (Linux) participants into my tinc
> network, but I want to protect them from accidentally binding a port so
> that it's accessible via tinc.
>
> For example, `nc -l` by...
2005 Jan 28
4
extracting from a data.frame
...ot;CE" "CE1" "CE2" "CE3" "CG"
[12] "CG1" "CG2" "CH2" "CZ" "CZ2" "CZ3" "N" "ND1" "ND2" "NE" "NE1"
[23] "NE2" "NH1" "NH2" "NZ" "O" "OD1" "OD2" "OE1" "OE2" "OG" "OG1"
[34] "OH" "OXT" "SD" "SG"
Now I would like to get all rows of a, that have the value "O" in V3.
I tried a lot of...
2018 Feb 04
2
Very slow rsync to gluster volume UNLESS `ls` or `find` scan dir on gluster volume first
...fter I started stracing rsync, all I could see was lstat calls, quite slow
ones, over and over, which is expected.
For example: lstat("uploads/2016/10/nexus2cee_DSC05339_thumb-161x107.jpg",
{st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=4043, ...}) = 0
I googled around and found
https://gist.github.com/nh2/1836415489e2132cf85ed3832105fcc1, which is seeing
this exact issue with gluster, rsync and xfs.
Here's the craziest finding so far. If while rsync is running (or right
before), I run /bin/ls or find on the same gluster dirs, it immediately
speeds up rsync by a factor of 100 or maybe even 1000....
2017 Jan 27
4
Disallow binding via tinc
I'm looking for a way to add some (Linux) participants into my tinc
network, but I want to protect them from accidentally binding a port so
that it's accessible via tinc.
For example, `nc -l` by default listens to all interfaces.
Similarly, some software (I think mongodb < 2.6 was among those) bind to
all interfaces AND allow unauthenticated access that can do remote code
execution,
2018 Feb 05
0
Very slow rsync to gluster volume UNLESS `ls` or `find` scan dir on gluster volume first
...l I could see was lstat calls, quite slow
> ones, over and over, which is expected.
>
> For example: lstat("uploads/2016/10/nexus2cee_DSC05339_thumb-161x107.jpg",
> {st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=4043, ...}) = 0
>
> I googled around and found
> https://gist.github.com/nh2/1836415489e2132cf85ed3832105fcc1, which is
> seeing this exact issue with gluster, rsync and xfs.
>
> Here's the craziest finding so far. If while rsync is running (or right
> before), I run /bin/ls or find on the same gluster dirs, it immediately
> speeds up rsync by a factor of...
2017 May 18
1
Improving packets/sec and data rate - v1.0.24
...inc config, and using full host
declerations for routs rather than dumping things to the tun interface
ambiguously.
"Forwarding = kernel"
ip route add 1.2.3.4 via 4.3.2.1 dev tun
-instead of-
ip route add 1.2.3.4 dev tun
On May 17, 2017 3:10 PM, "Niklas Hambüchen" <mail at nh2.me> wrote:
> On 17/05/17 21:50, Jared Ledvina wrote:
> > Were you ever able to make any further
> > progress on adjusting Tinc based on the investigation in
> > https://github.com/gsliepen/tinc/issues/110 ?
>
> Hi Jared,
>
> No, not yet.
>
> I list a few w...
2018 Feb 05
2
Very slow rsync to gluster volume UNLESS `ls` or `find` scan dir on gluster volume first
...> > ones, over and over, which is expected.
> >
> > For example: lstat("uploads/2016/10/nexus2cee_DSC05339_thumb-
> 161x107.jpg",
> > {st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=4043, ...}) = 0
> >
> > I googled around and found
> > https://gist.github.com/nh2/1836415489e2132cf85ed3832105fcc1, which is
> > seeing this exact issue with gluster, rsync and xfs.
> >
> > Here's the craziest finding so far. If while rsync is running (or right
> > before), I run /bin/ls or find on the same gluster dirs, it immediately
> > speed...
2017 Jan 27
0
Disallow binding via tinc
Why not just firewall incoming traffic on the clients?
On 27 Jan 2017 8:37 am, "Niklas Hambüchen" <mail at nh2.me> wrote:
> I'm looking for a way to add some (Linux) participants into my tinc
> network, but I want to protect them from accidentally binding a port so
> that it's accessible via tinc.
>
> For example, `nc -l` by default listens to all interfaces.
>
> Similarly,...
2017 Oct 24
0
create volume in two different Data Centers
Il 24/10/2017 12:45, atris adam ha scritto:
> thanks for answering. But I have to setup and test it myself and
> record the result. Can you guide me a little more. The problem is, one
> valid ip for each data centers exist, and each data centers have 3
> servers. How should I config the network in which the server bricks
> see each other to create a glusterfs volume?
>
I would
2017 Sep 17
3
Confusing lstat() performance
On 17/09/17 18:03, Niklas Hamb?chen wrote:
> So far the only difference between `ls` and `bup index` I could observe
> is that `bup index` chdir()s into the directory to index, ls doesn't.
>
> But when I `cd` into the dir and run `ls` without directory argument, it
> is still much faster than bup index for each stat().
Hmm, bup uses the fchdir() syscall to go into the target
2017 Sep 18
2
Confusing lstat() performance
Hi Ben,
do you know if the smallfile benchmark also does interleaved getdents()
and lstat, which is what I found as being the key difference that
creates the performance gap (further down this thread)?
Also, wouldn't `--threads 8` change the performance numbers by factor 8
versus the plain `ls` and `rsync` that I did?
Would you mind running those commands directly/plainly on your cluster
to
2017 Sep 18
0
Confusing lstat() performance
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Niklas Hamb?chen" <mail at nh2.me>
> To: "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com>
> Cc: gluster-users at gluster.org
> Sent: Sunday, September 17, 2017 9:49:10 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] Confusing lstat() performance
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> do you know if the smallfile benchmark also does...
2017 Sep 17
0
Confusing lstat() performance
I found the reason now, at least for this set of lstat()s I was looking at.
bup first does all getdents(), obtaining all file names in the
directory, and then stat()s them.
Apparently this destroys some of gluster's caching, making stat()s ~100x
slower.
What caching could this be, and how could I convince gluster to serve
these stat()s as fast as if a getdents() had been done just before
2017 Oct 24
2
create volume in two different Data Centers
thanks for answering. But I have to setup and test it myself and record the
result. Can you guide me a little more. The problem is, one valid ip for
each data centers exist, and each data centers have 3 servers. How should I
config the network in which the server bricks see each other to create a
glusterfs volume?
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 1:47 PM, <lemonnierk at ulrar.net> wrote:
> Hi,
2017 Sep 14
5
Confusing lstat() performance
Hi,
I have a gluster 3.10 volume with a dir with ~1 million small files in
them, say mounted at /mnt/dir with FUSE, and I'm observing something weird:
When I list and stat them all using rsync, then the lstat() calls that
rsync does are incredibly fast (23 microseconds per call on average,
definitely faster than a network roundtrip between my 3-machine bricks
connected via Ethernet).
But
2017 Sep 18
1
Confusing lstat() performance
On 18/09/17 17:23, Ben Turner wrote:
> Do you want tuned or untuned? If tuned I'd like to try one of my tunings for metadata, but I will use yours if you want.
(Re-CC'd list)
I would be interested in both, if possible: To confirm that it's not
only my machines that exhibit this behaviour given my settings, and to
see what can be achieved with your tuned settings.
Thank you!
2017 Sep 18
0
Confusing lstat() performance
...clients and servers(echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches) before running your tests to eliminate server and client side caching. If you are not dropping cache this could also cause the differences you are seeing.
-b
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Niklas Hamb?chen" <mail at nh2.me>
> To: gluster-users at gluster.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2017 8:42:44 AM
> Subject: [Gluster-users] Confusing lstat() performance
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a gluster 3.10 volume with a dir with ~1 million small files in
> them, say mounted at /mnt/dir with FUSE,...
2018 Feb 05
0
Very slow rsync to gluster volume UNLESS `ls` or `find` scan dir on gluster volume first
...er, which is expected.
>> >
>> > For example: lstat("uploads/2016/10/nexus2c
>> ee_DSC05339_thumb-161x107.jpg",
>> > {st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=4043, ...}) = 0
>> >
>> > I googled around and found
>> > https://gist.github.com/nh2/1836415489e2132cf85ed3832105fcc1, which is
>> > seeing this exact issue with gluster, rsync and xfs.
>> >
>> > Here's the craziest finding so far. If while rsync is running (or right
>> > before), I run /bin/ls or find on the same gluster dirs, it immediately...
2017 Sep 15
0
Confusing lstat() performance
Hi Niklas,
Out of interest have you tried testing performance with performance.stat-prefetch enabled?
--
Sam McLeod
@s_mcleod
https://smcleod.net
> On 14 Sep 2017, at 10:42 pm, Niklas Hamb?chen <mail at nh2.me> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a gluster 3.10 volume with a dir with ~1 million small files in
> them, say mounted at /mnt/dir with FUSE, and I'm observing something weird:
>
> When I list and stat them all using rsync, then the lstat() calls that
> rsync does are i...