Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40 matches for "nfs4_acls".
2010 Aug 19
1
zfsacl and nfs4 settings
I am looking for where zfsacl settings such as, zfsacl: acesort =
dontcare , are documented.
Do I need NFS settings such as, nfs4: mode = simple , if I am not using
NFS? If I do, where are they documented?
Thanks
2018 Apr 06
2
Operation Not Supported error for GETXATTR when VFS plugin "nfs4acl_xattr" is used
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:40:31PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:22:17PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:27:32AM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:44:50PM +0530, Akash Jain wrote:
> > > > Hi All
> > > >
> > > > I found there is one bug in the plugin. The
2018 Apr 06
2
Operation Not Supported error for GETXATTR when VFS plugin "nfs4acl_xattr" is used
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:27:32AM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:44:50PM +0530, Akash Jain wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I found there is one bug in the plugin. The name of the attribute for ACL as
> > per strace output of nfs4_setfacl is system.nfs4_acl.
> > The source code has defined it as
> > #define
2018 Apr 06
2
Operation Not Supported error for GETXATTR when VFS plugin "nfs4acl_xattr" is used
Hi All
I found there is one bug in the plugin. The name of the attribute for ACL
as per strace output of nfs4_setfacl is *system.nfs4_acl.*
The source code has defined it as
#define NFS4ACL_XATTR_NAME ( "system.nfs4acl" )
Note there is missing underscore.
After this, the EOPNOTSUPP error is not observed.
Hope this helps
Akash
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 11:43 PM, Jeremy Allison
2018 Sep 18
1
Why are system-namespaces not copied?
Hi,
the man page states
For systems that support extended-attribute namespaces, a copy being
done by a super-user copies all namespaces except system.*.
That's the reason why NFAv4 ACLs are not copied as they are in the
system.nfs4_acl (or system.nfs4acl) namespace.
Why are those namespaces excluded?
Not being able rsync ACLs von NFSv4 is a major drawback now that
NFsv4 becomes
2019 Jul 25
0
NFS4 extended attributes confusion
Hi,
would someone please clarify the behavior of -X --filter='some_filter'
to me? I was trying to copy a file on a NFS4 mount and some extended
attributes get transferred only when run as a normal user with --super
but not as root. If I have a file on nfs4 mount and I set some extended
attributes like this:
#rsync --version
rsync? version 3.1.3? protocol version 31
Copyright (C)
2019 Apr 30
1
Group Permissions Not Working
...eeds group write access to attributes or it won’t attempt to write to the objects at all…
So we (a co-worker of mine) created the following patch which seems to solve the issue (it basically lies and adds the “write to attributes” of “write to files” is set):
--- samba-4.9.4-test/source3/modules/nfs4_acls.c 2018-07-12 10:23:36.000000000 +0200
+++ samba-4.9.4-mikha02/source3/modules/nfs4_acls.c 2019-03-04 11:29:29.263401000 +0100
@@ -380,6 +380,17 @@
DEBUG(10, ("Windows mapped ace flags: 0x%x => 0x%x\n",
ace->aceFlags, win_ace_flags));...
2018 Apr 09
2
Operation Not Supported error for GETXATTR when VFS plugin "nfs4acl_xattr" is used
Hello Jeremy and Ralph
Thanks for your suggestions.
I compiled samba-4.8.0 and running it instead of samba-4.6.2. I saw the
changes that you mentioned in the latest vfs_nfs4acl_xattr module.
The operation not supported error is gone but it is now failing with access
denied. Here is what I tried:
*[root at test3 ajain]# net conf showshare local[local] path =
/home/ajain/mount
2015 Dec 04
2
Linux & NFSv4 ACLs
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeremy Allison" <jra at samba.org>
> To: "Nick E Couchman" <nick.couchman at seakr.com>
> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 1:22:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux & NFSv4 ACLs
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 07:31:36PM -0700, Nick Couchman wrote:
>>
>> Try these pages (U
2017 Mar 20
4
Skip ACL checks
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:38:57PM +0100, Christoph Kleineweber wrote:
> > I am wondering if there is a way to bypass Samba's ACL checks and
> delegate
> > access control completely to the underlying file system.
> >
> > My problem arises from the following scenario: Our file system
2018 Apr 05
4
Operation Not Supported error for GETXATTR when VFS plugin "nfs4acl_xattr" is used
Hello All
I am trying to use nfs4acl_xattr plugin from samba source code.
https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/vfs_nfs4acl_xattr.8.html
I mounted NFSv4 mount point locally and exported it through samba with vfs
objects set to nfs4acl_xattr.
*[root at test3 ajain]# net conf showshare local[local] path =
/home/ajain/mount comment = local share guest ok =
2015 Dec 04
2
Linux & NFSv4 ACLs
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jeremy Allison" <jra at samba.org>
> To: "Nick E Couchman" <nick.couchman at seakr.com>
> Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 6:13:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux & NFSv4 ACLs
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:03:39PM -0700, Nick Couchman wrote:
>>
>> > On Dec 3,
2015 Dec 04
0
Linux & NFSv4 ACLs
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 01:37:33PM -0700, Nick Couchman wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jeremy Allison" <jra at samba.org>
> > To: "Nick E Couchman" <nick.couchman at seakr.com>
> > Cc: samba at lists.samba.org
> > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2015 1:22:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Samba] Linux & NFSv4 ACLs
>
>
2017 Mar 20
0
Skip ACL checks
On Mon, 2017-03-20 at 10:57 +0100, Christoph Kleineweber via samba
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Volker Lendecke <vl at samba.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 05:38:57PM +0100, Christoph Kleineweber
> > wrote:
> > > I am wondering if there is a way to bypass Samba's ACL checks and
> >
> > delegate
> > > access
2018 Apr 06
0
Operation Not Supported error for GETXATTR when VFS plugin "nfs4acl_xattr" is used
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:44:50PM +0530, Akash Jain wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I found there is one bug in the plugin. The name of the attribute for ACL as
> per strace output of nfs4_setfacl is system.nfs4_acl.
> The source code has defined it as
> #define NFS4ACL_XATTR_NAME ( "system.nfs4acl" )
>
> Note there is missing underscore.
>
> After this, the
2018 Apr 06
0
Operation Not Supported error for GETXATTR when VFS plugin "nfs4acl_xattr" is used
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:22:17PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:27:32AM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:44:50PM +0530, Akash Jain wrote:
> > > Hi All
> > >
> > > I found there is one bug in the plugin. The name of the attribute for ACL as
> > > per strace output of nfs4_setfacl is
2018 Apr 06
0
Operation Not Supported error for GETXATTR when VFS plugin "nfs4acl_xattr" is used
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:28:16PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:40:31PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:22:17PM +0200, Ralph Böhme wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:27:32AM -0700, Jeremy Allison via samba wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:44:50PM +0530, Akash Jain wrote:
> > > > > Hi
2006 Oct 31
0
6358522 ACL: When given unsupported special identifiers error w/ NFS4ERR_BADOWNER not NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUP
Author: lisagab
Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate
Revision: bea1516fc595714f8684eb7ea36d6a5d25062ec4
Log message:
6358522 ACL: When given unsupported special identifiers error w/ NFS4ERR_BADOWNER not NFS4ERR_ATTRNOTSUP
Files:
update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/nfs/nfs4_acl.c
2006 Oct 31
0
6394541 ACL translators should ignore ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP on special IDs
Author: samf
Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate
Revision: ba9ce2ac74c77d65eac9cb61105b4d62fdce5311
Log message:
6394541 ACL translators should ignore ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP on special IDs
Files:
update: usr/src/uts/common/fs/nfs/nfs4_acl.c
2018 Oct 10
1
NFSv4, homes, Kerberos...
On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:25:16 +0200
"L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hai,
>
> Hmm.. Bummer..
> I just discovered the debian package dont have the vfs_nfs4acl
> include in the build.
>
> And because of that it's not in my packages. I'll have a look into
> it, see what i can make of it.
>
That is odd, it