search for: nfs3

...s, 69.8 MB/s dd of=garb if=/dev/zero bs=128K count=10000 10000+0 records in 10000+0 records out 1310720000 bytes (1.3 GB) copied, 18.9837 seconds, 69.0 MB/s dd if=/dev/zero of=garb bs=256k count=64000 My server freezes. Here is the recent nfs log when the server froze: [2010-04-09 23:37:33] D [nfs3-helpers.c:2114:nfs3_log_rw_call] nfs-nfsv3: XID: 6f68c85f, WRITE: args: FH: hashcount 2, xlid 0, gen 5458285267163021319, ino 11856898, offset: 1129578496, count: 65536, UNSTABLE [2010-04-09 23:37:33] D [rpcsvc.c:1790:rpcsvc_request_create] rpc-service: RPC XID: 7068c85f, Ver: 2, Program: 100003,...

.../io-stats 51: option latency-measurement off 52: option count-fop-hits off 53: subvolumes poolsave-stat-prefetch 54: end-volume 55: 56: volume nfs-server 57: type nfs/server 58: option nfs.dynamic-volumes on 59: option rpc-auth.addr.poolsave.allow * 60: option nfs3.poolsave.volume-id 71e0dabf-4620-4b6d-b138-3266096b93b6 61: option nfs.port 2049 62: subvolumes poolsave 63: end-volume +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ [2011-06-09 16:52:23.709018] I [rpc-clnt.c:1531:rpc_clnt_reconfig] 0-poolsave-client-0...

...ther smb.conf file but I don't think I'm on the right track. Like I said, a newbie question. Can anyone tell me if what I'm trying to do is possible in samba. An example of what I wish to do is: \\NFS1\disk1 \\NFS1\disk2 \\NFS2\code \\NFS3\source Basically I wish to have services called NFS1, NFS2, NFS3 running all from one box and only being capable of getting into "disk1" if I'm mapped to service NFS1, accessing "code" if I'm mapped to NFS2 etc .......

...h_get_by_key_latch :HT CACHE :DEBUG :cih cache hit slot 27352 06/03/2018 11:08:01 : epoch 5a9e7635 : gnfs01.local : ganesha.nfsd-6933[work-48] nfs4_Compound :NFS4 :DEBUG :Request 2: opcode 3 is OP_ACCESS 06/03/2018 11:08:01 : epoch 5a9e7635 : gnfs01.local : ganesha.nfsd-6933[work-48] nfs_access_op :NFS3 :DEBUG :NFS3: DEBUG: Requested ACCESS=READ,LOOKUP,MODIFY,EXTEND,DELETE,- 06/03/2018 11:08:01 : epoch 5a9e7635 : gnfs01.local : ganesha.nfsd-6933[work-48] nfs_access_op :NFS3 :DEBUG :NFS3: DEBUG: access_mask = mode(rwx) ACL(list_dir,add_file,execute,add_subdirectory,delete_child) 06/03/2018 11:08:01...

...e problem did not occur with samba 3.0.22 and 3.0.23. But the problem occured also on the "self-compiled" samba 3.0.24. He also compiled several versions of samba on debian 3.1/sarge: There the problem did not occour with any version of samba. I have tried to have these samba-shares on nfs3 and nfs4 filesystems. The choice of nfs3 or nfs4 doesn't affect the problem. So my question is how it is possible to use samba on debian 4.0 in such a configuration. I would prefer to use official debian packages or the packges from the samba.org-webpage (but at the moment there are no Debi...

...t one child while attempting RMDIR on {pgfid:23558c59-87e5-4e90-a610-8a47ec08b27c, name:csrc}. [2017-12-21 13:56:01.594648] I [MSGID: 108019] [afr-transaction.c:1903:afr_post_blocking_entrylk_cbk] 0-g_sitework2-replicate-4: Blocking entrylks failed. [2017-12-21 13:56:01.594790] W [MSGID: 112032] [nfs3.c:3713:nfs3svc_rmdir_cbk] 0-nfs: df521f4d: <gfid:23558c59-87e5-4e90-a610-8a47ec08b27c>/csrc => -1 (Stale file handle) [Stale file handle] [2017-12-21 13:56:01.594816] W [MSGID: 112199] [nfs3-helpers.c:3414:nfs3_log_common_res] 0-nfs-nfsv3: <gfid:23558c59-87e5-4e90-a610-8a47ec08b27c>...

Hi all, 1) My NFS3 clients don't display or obey existing non-POSIX ACLs on files of NFS3-mounted exports. 2) setfacl on the client throws error and fails : # setfacl -m u:stowler:rw testfile.text setfacl: testfile.text: Operation not supported 3) at time of client mount the server's /var/log/messages shows...

.... > Then the user is a member of 'sharegroup', the samba-tool command > searches AD for 'memberOf' attributes containing the DN of the group > and then prints the samAccountName from the 'memberOf' attributes. It seems like not because the user can't access the nfs3-share because of permission. Anything else I could check?

I have a system that I'm vetting as a NAS server. It has a 2.0TB XFS filesystem mounted on /storage and I'm doing benchmarks using nfs3, nfs4, and samba. I'm testing via iozone by mounting the filesystem from my "nas client" box and then running iozone on the mounted filesystem. NFS seems pretty fast - ie, several orders of magnitude faster than samba, and I'm wondering why, so I'm beseeching the help of the...

...he server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance issues were discovered with the setup. For various reasons, updating the client is not an option at this time. The fix the issue, the server needs to export NFS3 mounts but the clients do not support that version. As a workaround, I considered adding a third system running CentOS that would mount the server and re-export it to the clients. This will mitigate the current issue related to visibility of the share from certain groups. It does not appear possi...

...RMDIR on {pgfid:23558c59-87e5-4e90-a610-8a47ec08b27c, > name:csrc}. > > [2017-12-21 13:56:01.594648] I [MSGID: 108019] [afr-transaction.c:1903:afr_post_blocking_entrylk_cbk] > 0-g_sitework2-replicate-4: Blocking entrylks failed. > > [2017-12-21 13:56:01.594790] W [MSGID: 112032] [nfs3.c:3713:nfs3svc_rmdir_cbk] > 0-nfs: df521f4d: <gfid:23558c59-87e5-4e90-a610-8a47ec08b27c>/csrc => -1 > (Stale file handle) [Stale file handle] > > [2017-12-21 13:56:01.594816] W [MSGID: 112199] > [nfs3-helpers.c:3414:nfs3_log_common_res] 0-nfs-nfsv3: > <gfid:23558c59-87...

...90-a610-8a47ec08b27c, name:csrc}. >> >> [2017-12-21 13:56:01.594648] I [MSGID: 108019] >> [afr-transaction.c:1903:afr_post_blocking_entrylk_cbk] >> 0-g_sitework2-replicate-4: Blocking entrylks failed. >> >> [2017-12-21 13:56:01.594790] W [MSGID: 112032] >> [nfs3.c:3713:nfs3svc_rmdir_cbk] 0-nfs: df521f4d: >> <gfid:23558c59-87e5-4e90-a610-8a47ec08b27c>/csrc => -1 (Stale file >> handle) [Stale file handle] >> >> [2017-12-21 13:56:01.594816] W [MSGID: 112199] >> [nfs3-helpers.c:3414:nfs3_log_common_res] 0-nfs-nfsv3: >&...

...make improvement, I have following approaches. I would like to hear your feedback to them. 1. add an argument to rfscall() and rfs3call(), pass XID as an parameter pro: little performance overhead con: change all the code that calls rfs3call() and rfscall(), even they are not related to nfs3 client 2. insert XID into some argument of rfscall() and rfs3call() pro: little performance overhead con: change all the code that calls rfs3call() and rfscall(), even they are not related to nfs3 client because rfscall() is not just for nfs3 3. move the dtrace probe declaration in...

>>>>> "Mark" == Mark Moseley <moseleymark at gmail.com> writes: Mark> This is just me throwing things out to look at, but did the Mark> client mount on the old server use NFS3 and the new upgraded Mark> client uses NFS4? Sometimes that can cause weirdness with id Mark> mapping.? Another thing to check is selinux, is it enabled? It's one of those things I have to poke at on RHEL systems, but I can't remember if it's on by default on Debian Buster....

...hem not to. This is what I wrote, describing the situation to some co-workers: =============== With Joseph's and Kevin's help, I've been able to replicate Kevin's complete workflow on BDUC and executed it with a normally mounted gluster fs and my gluster-via-NFS-loopback (on both NFS3 and NFS4 clients). The good news is that the workflow went to completion on BDUC with the native gluster fs mount, doing pretty decent IO on one node - topping out at about 250MB/s in and 75MB/s out (DDR IB) ib1 KB/s in KB/s out 268248.1 62278.40 262835.1 64813.55 24846...

We''re starting to grow our ZFS environment and really need to start standardizing our monitoring procedures. OS tools are great for spot troubleshooting and sar can be used for some trending, but we''d really like to tie this into an SNMP based system that can generate graphs for us (via RRD or other). Whether or not we do this via our standard enterprise monitoring tool or

...at this is because Windows seems to have broken my older setup. Rowland has been pushing Samba accounts as the way to fix it. > > Next you decide if you are good with unencrypted shares authorized by > client-machine-IP, if so the simplest form of NFS4 (very similar to > the setup of NFS3) will do. If not you have to setup Kerberized NFS > which has user-authentication (due to kerberos) and allows shares > encrypted on the wire just as SMB has in recent versions. Yes. My NFS4 setup is basically NFS3 with newer server software. > > At the moment I am still using NFS4 fo...

Hi, everyone. Its nice meeting you. I am poor at English.... I am writing this because I'd like to update GlusterFS to 3.2.2-1,and I want to change from gluster mount to nfs mount. I have installed GlusterFS 3.2.1 one week ago,and replication 2 server. OS:CentOS5.5 64bit RPM:glusterfs-core-3.2.1-1 glusterfs-fuse-3.2.1-1 command gluster volume create syncdata replica 2 transport tcp

Is there a current best practice for a shared filesystem backend for mailboxes (in my case, all virtual accounts)?? NFS 3/4, GFS2, GlusterFS, other?? In the case of the latter ones, is the use of Director necessary?? Any specific anti-recommendations?? Also, if it matters, I *think* I want to use BackBlaze racks for storage.? Also, I've seen recommendations for the filesystem underneath like

...> >> other::--- > >> default:user::rwx > >> default:group::--- > >> default:group:EXAMPLE\134sharegroup:rwx > >> default:mask::rwx > >> default:other::--- > >> > >> > It seems like not because the user can't access the nfs3-share > because of permission. Anything else I could check? I take it the 'getfacl' output is for the nfs3-share, so if your user is a member of the 'sharegroup', the user should be able to access the share, unless something else is blocking it (trying to connect from a non join...