search for: nfi

I was wondering if there was a way to recompile ogg123 so that it didnt look for "Ogg" at the start of each file. Ie change it so it looked for "Dog" or something. Why you ask? because in theory Im not ment to have any music files on my work computer NFI why but just cant. If I could mask an ogg file to look like another file then I could beat the system. Assuming that they even know what Ogg Vorbis is. the bits in the header I would like to change are Ogg vorbis Xiphophorus libVorbis cheers the captain _______________________________________...

...all that's needed. Thanks again! -ilia > > Thanks, > Ben > > struct h264_picparm_vp { // 700..a00 > uint16_t width, height; > uint32_t stride1, stride2; // 04 08 > uint32_t ofs[6]; // 0c..24 in-image offset > > uint32_t u24; // nfi ac8 ? -> ColocBufferSize > uint32_t bucket_size; // 28 bucket size > uint32_t inter_ring_data_size; // 2c > > unsigned f0 : 1; // 0 0x01: into 640 shifted by 3, 540 shifted by 5, half size something? -> MbaffFrameFlag > unsigned f1 : 1; // 1 0x02...

Create the ref_bo without any storage type flags set for now. The issue probably arises from our use of the additional buffer space at the end of the ref_bo. It should probably be split up in the future. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> Tested-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres at labri.fr> Cc: "10.0" <mesa-stable at lists.freedesktop.org> ---

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Benjamin Morris <bmorris at nvidia.com> wrote: >> On 11/19/2013 08:16 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I hope this is an appropriate style of request for this forum. I added >>> code to support video decoding on the tesla

...a data frame with numeric coords and factors: > names(data) [1] "x" "y" "bloc" "sub" "inoc" "etat" etc... > levels(data$etat) [1] "" "F" "Fi" "NF" "NFi" I do: > levels(data$etat) <- c(0, 2, -2, 1, -1) > data$etat <- as.numeric(as.vector(data$etat)) > C1 <- subset(data, sub=="C" & bloc=="1", select=c(x, y, etat)) > x11() > lset(theme = col.whitebg()) > bubble(C1, xcol = 1, ycol = 2, zcol...

...) and I get following results; Model Chisquare = 12.524 Df = 1 Pr(>Chisq) = 0.00040179 Chisquare (null model) = 812.69 Df = 3 Goodness-of-fit index = 0.98083 Adjusted goodness-of-fit index = 0.885 RMSEA index = 0.16545 90% CI: (0.09231, 0.25264) Bentler-Bonnett NFI = 0.98459 Tucker-Lewis NNFI = 0.9573 Bentler CFI = 0.98577 SRMR = 0.027022 BIC = 6.4789 Parameter Estimates Estimate Std Error z value Pr(>|z|) x1-y1 -0.67833 0.033967 -19.970 0 y1 <--- x1 x2-x1 3.88384 0.293743 13.222 0 x1 <--> x2 x2-x2 12.05082...

...y this allows you to make some quick progress; you can apply the same logic you already have for G84 to your G98 code path. Thanks, Ben struct h264_picparm_vp { // 700..a00 uint16_t width, height; uint32_t stride1, stride2; // 04 08 uint32_t ofs[6]; // 0c..24 in-image offset uint32_t u24; // nfi ac8 ? -> ColocBufferSize uint32_t bucket_size; // 28 bucket size uint32_t inter_ring_data_size; // 2c unsigned f0 : 1; // 0 0x01: into 640 shifted by 3, 540 shifted by 5, half size something? -> MbaffFrameFlag unsigned f1 : 1; // 1 0x02: into vuc ofs 56 -> direct_8x8_inference_flag u...

...SCH, x2x1, NA"), I DO get all the usual statistics: Model Chisquare = 1303.7 Df = 1 Pr(>Chisq) = 0 Chisquare (null model) = 8526.8 Df = 6 Goodness-of-fit index = 0.95864 Adjusted goodness-of-fit index = 0.58639 RMSEA index = 0.30029 90% CI: (NA, NA) Bentler-Bonnett NFI = 0.84711 Tucker-Lewis NNFI = 0.082726 Bentler CFI = 0.84712 BIC = 1294.1 My understanding is the you should always put in the correlation between exogenous predictors, but when I do this I don't get fit statistics. Can anyone help me understand what is happening here? Thank you...

...00c14, 0x00000000, 0x00000002); + nv_mask(priv, 0x100c24, 0x00000002, 0x000027fd); + nv_mask(priv, 0x100c14, 0x00000000, 0x00010000); + } + /* The below segments of code copying values from one register to * another appear to inform EVO of the display capabilities or * something similar. NFI what the 0x614004 caps are for.. -- 2.1.0

...} >> @@ -114,22 +114,25 @@ nouveau_mc_create_(struct nouveau_object *parent, struct nouveau_object *engine, >> if (ret) >> return ret; >> >> - switch (device->pdev->device & 0x0ff0) { >> - case 0x00f0: >> - case 0x02e0: >> - /* BR02? NFI how these would be handled yet exactly */ >> - break; >> - default: >> - switch (device->chipset) { >> - case 0xaa: break; /* reported broken, nv also disable it */ >> - default: >> - pmc->use_msi = true; >> + if (nv_device_is_pci(device)) >&...

I wonder if someone could explain why, when I perform confirmatory factor-analysis model using polychoric correlations why I do not get an estimated confidence interval for the RMSEA. My experience with these type models is that I would obtain a confidence interval estimate. I did not get any warning messages with the output. RESULTS: Model Chisquare =...

...stroy(&pmc->base); > } > @@ -114,22 +114,25 @@ nouveau_mc_create_(struct nouveau_object *parent, struct nouveau_object *engine, > if (ret) > return ret; > > - switch (device->pdev->device & 0x0ff0) { > - case 0x00f0: > - case 0x02e0: > - /* BR02? NFI how these would be handled yet exactly */ > - break; > - default: > - switch (device->chipset) { > - case 0xaa: break; /* reported broken, nv also disable it */ > - default: > - pmc->use_msi = true; > + if (nv_device_is_pci(device)) > + switch (device->pdev-&...

...s the number stays the same, and after ~60 seconds the stopping process fails; leaving the remaining 15 processes either in S or in D state is `ps aux` i cannot kill -9 those processes, they either switch to deadlock or just stay deadlocked. The only resolution i have is to do a very ugly `reboot -nfi` so far i can provide the output of testparm, and also the relevant logs of loglevel 1, but i have the feeling that might not be enough? any help is very much appreciated! Erik

...ity=1246525654 uid_next=1 subs=yes last_change=0 last_subs=0 dsync(gerben): Debug: brain M: Local mailbox tree: Spam_train guid=7076d5076b219a5dd73700009e3b11ac uid_validity=1570382190 uid_next=3719 subs=no last_change=0 last_subs=0 dsync(gerben): Debug: brain S: Local mailbox tree: zzz-Old/Werk/UitNFIMailboxen guid=1da8c05ea358b80ee1c2f3a01cc7f2cc uid_validity=1232523595 uid_next=118 subs=yes last_change=0 last_subs=0 dsync(gerben): Debug: brain M: Local mailbox tree: Trash guid=4810f5076b219a5dd73700009e3b11ac uid_validity=1570382191 uid_next=3 subs=no last_change=0 last_subs=0 dsync(gerben): D...

...gt; X6, NA, 1 This at least converges: > summary(fit.sem) Model Chisquare = 2147 Df = 10 Pr(>Chisq) = 0 Chisquare (null model) = 2934 Df = 15 Goodness-of-fit index = 0.4822 Adjusted goodness-of-fit index = -0.087387 RMSEA index = 0.66107 90 % CI: (NA, NA) Bentler-Bonnett NFI = 0.26823 Tucker-Lewis NNFI = -0.098156 Bentler CFI = 0.26790 BIC = 2085.1 Normalized Residuals Min. 1st Qu. Median Mean 3rd Qu. Max. -5.990 -0.618 0.192 0.165 1.700 3.950 Parameter Estimates Estimate Std Error z value Pr(>|z|) l11 -0.245981 0.21863 -1.1251...

...>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv20.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv20.c >> @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ nv20_graph_init(struct nouveau_object *object) >> nv_wr32(priv, NV10_PGRAPH_SURFACE, tmp); >> >> /* begin RAM config */ >> - vramsz = pci_resource_len(nv_device(priv)->pdev, 0) - 1; >> + vramsz = nv_device_resource_len(nv_device(priv), 0) - 1; > > In case BAR0 is of size zero (start == 0, end == start), this will cause > underflow in the case of a PCI device, because pci_resource_...

Hello, I'm using the "sem" package to do a confirmatory factor analysis on data collected with a questionnaire. In the model, there is a unique factor G and 23 items. I would like to calculate the standardized residual variance of the observed variables. "Sem" only gives the residual variance with the "summary" function, o...

...mp; ? ? ? ?printf 'if [ "$(stat --printf='\''%%Y '\'' '\''%s'\''; sha256sum '\''%s'\'')" = '\''%s %s'\'' ]; then\n\trm -f '\''%s'\'';\nfi\n' "${p}" "${p}" "${m}" "${h}" "${p}" | ? ?env -i PATH="${PATH}" LC_ALL="${LC_ALL}" ? ?at -M 'now + 3 minutes' 2>&1 ? } || { rm -f "${p}" &&...

.../engine/graph/nv20.c index b24559315903..d145e080899a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv20.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nv20.c @@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ nv20_graph_init(struct nouveau_object *object) nv_wr32(priv, NV10_PGRAPH_SURFACE, tmp); /* begin RAM config */ - vramsz = pci_resource_len(nv_device(priv)->pdev, 0) - 1; + vramsz = nv_device_resource_len(nv_device(priv), 0) - 1; nv_wr32(priv, 0x4009A4, nv_rd32(priv, 0x100200)); nv_wr32(priv, 0x4009A8, nv_rd32(priv, 0x100204)); nv_wr32(priv, NV10_PGRAPH_RDI_INDEX, 0x00EA0000); diff --git a/drive...

This is more or less simplified series of patches that bring power usage on my NV86 close to that of binary blob. Best regards, Maxim Levitsky