Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "nf_stop".
Did you mean:
ndo_stop
2007 Apr 18
3
[Bridge] Re: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872..
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:05:59 +0000
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 08:50 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > It's not really an oops, just a warning that stack space got quiet
> > tight.
> >
> > The problem seems to be that the br netfilter code is nesting far too
> > deeply and recursing several times. Looks like a design
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] [PATCH/RFC] Reduce call chain length in netfilter (take 2)
...Bart
--- linux-2.6.11-rc3/include/linux/netfilter.h.old 2005-02-12 13:48:13.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc3/include/linux/netfilter.h 2005-02-12 17:02:48.000000000 +0100
@@ -18,7 +18,8 @@
#define NF_STOLEN 2
#define NF_QUEUE 3
#define NF_REPEAT 4
-#define NF_MAX_VERDICT NF_REPEAT
+#define NF_STOP 5
+#define NF_MAX_VERDICT NF_STOP
/* Generic cache responses from hook functions.
<= 0x2000 is used for protocol-flags. */
@@ -138,21 +139,32 @@ void nf_log_packet(int pf,
/* This is gross, but inline doesn't cut it for avoiding the function
call in fast path: gcc doesn't inl...