search for: next2

Would this work? The problem is, I do not have roaming profiles in use(As it is not practical for us, as users tend to use the same computers). I want only users with IP from 192.168.1.x to load the databases. The loaddatabases.cmd file in question would contain rem Grab IP address and dump to a file ipconfig >"%userprofile%\ipconfig.txt" echo Checking for your location

...64 %iNumElements) { Entry: br label %L_pre_head L_pre_head: ; preds = %Entry br label %L_entry L_entry: ; preds = %L_entry, %L_pre_head %lsr.iv1 = phi i64 [ %lsr.iv.next2, %L_entry ], [ 0, %L_pre_head ] %lsr.iv = phi i64 [ %lsr.iv.next, %L_entry ], [ %iNumElements, %L_pre_head ] %idxprom = ashr exact i64 %lsr.iv1, 32 %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds float* %a, i64 %idxprom %0 = load float* %arrayidx, align 4 %array...

...; <int*> [#uses=3] implementation ; Functions: int %_Z3fooi(int %k) { entry: %tmp.24 = setgt int %k, 0 ; <bool> [#uses=1] %tmp.35 = load int* %i ; <int> [#uses=2] br label %next1 ; br bool %tmp.24, label %no_exit.preheader, label %loopexit next1: br bool %tmp.24, label %next2, label %next3 next2: %tmp.100 = add int %tmp.35, 1 store int %tmp.100, int* %j br label %next3 next3: br bool %tmp.24, label %next4, label %next5 next4: %tmp.102 = add int %tmp.35, 4 store int %tmp.102, int* %j br label %next5 next5: %tmp.aux = cast bool %tmp.24 to int %tmp.x = xor int...

The linker is going off in the weeds trying to parse the dwarf unwind info. The CIE has: Leh_frame_common_begin0: .long 0 ## CIE Identifier Tag .byte 1 ## DW_CIE_VERSION .asciz "zLR" ## CIE Augmentation .byte 1 ## CIE Code Alignment Factor .byte 120 ## CIE Data Alignment

Hi, If I type define i32 @main() gc "shadow-stack" { entry: %0 = alloca i8* %1 = call i8* @malloc(i64 1) store i8* %1, i8** %0 call void @llvm.gcroot(i8** %0, i8* null) ret i32 0 } declare i8* @malloc(i64) declare void @llvm.gcroot(i8**, i8*) nounwind in test.ll and then do > llc test.ll > gcc test.s I get the error ld: in

...e.next1 = getelementptr %gc_stackentry.main* %gc_frame, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0 %gc_savedhead = load %gc_stackentry** %gc_frame.next1 store %gc_stackentry* %gc_savedhead, %gc_stackentry** @llvm_gc_root_chain ret i32 0 gc_cleanup: ; preds = %entry %gc_frame.next2 = getelementptr %gc_stackentry.main* %gc_frame, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0 %gc_savedhead3 = load %gc_stackentry** %gc_frame.next2 store %gc_stackentry* %gc_savedhead3, %gc_stackentry** @llvm_gc_root_chain unwind } However, there isn't a personality function associated here. This conflicts with...

...problem that 'smbclient' loses some files when it's creating a tar ball. A patch attached this message is for samba 2.2.8a and fixes this problem. Would you please check it? I think there is a protocol mismatch with Windows 2000 at cli_list_new() in libsmb/clilist.c (FIND FIRST2/FIND NEXT2). Samba assumes that 'Last Name Offset' response field is points to - the first octet of FileName field of the last file/directory entry. But responses from Windows 2000 points to - the first octet of the last file/directory entry. As result, smbclient sets 'mask' in...

...ictor3.lopes@voila.fr [SMTP:victor3.lopes@voila.fr] > > > > Error: Looping in FIND_NEXT?? > > > > What the problem, which parameter to set in configuration of smb.conf > > to do resolve the problem. > > > None. smbclient and smbfs use of TRANS2_FIND_FIRST2/NEXT2 was and might still be shady when stressed. There where problems with listing the contents of a large directory using smbfs not to long ago. Seems that funny characters in filenames can confuse this code. Try other directories. Or try moving half the files into another directory momentarily and the...

...it might be a free-space issue so I used the smb.conf to limit the apparent freespace to 100 mb. Didn't fix it.) I used a tcpdump to discover that when browsing inside shares, packets are generated that contain names of directories. One packet contains a lot of directory names. ("Find Next2" or something similar). Between each packet that contains directory names there is about .4 seconds, with no other network activity (other than ACKs and related). When browsing the same directories from the crapo IDE disk, this .4 second delay is not present. There is hardly any real disk...

...quot;Loop Function Root.split", %"16.cloned" - %indvar3 = phi i64 [ 0, %"Loop Function Root.split" ], [ %1, %"16.cloned" ] - %2 = mul i64 %indvar3, 4096 + %indvar1 = phi i64 [ 0, %"Loop Function Root.split" ], [ %1, %"16.cloned" ] + %indvar.next2 = add i64 %indvar1, 1 + %2 = load i64* inttoptr (i64 47280713800 to i64*), align 8 + %3 = mul i64 %2, %indvar.next2 + %4 = add i64 %3, -4160 br label %"12.cloned" "15.cloned": ; preds = %"14.cloned" - %3 = add i64 %indvar1,...

This is a first draft of a subvolume quota implementation. It is possible to limit subvolumes and any group of subvolumes and also to track the amount of space that will get freed when deleting snapshots. The current version is functionally incomplete, with the main missing feature being the initial scan and rescan of an existing filesystem. I put some effort into writing an introduction into