search for: newrhs

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I presume you mean, instead of assigning function arguments distinct ranks > (http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/Reassociate_8cpp_source.html#l00282), we > should group function arguments in favor of existing pairings. Existing = pairings reassociate already chose before *not* existing

...nt comparison, it always assumes that the return type of those libcalls is i32. Why not allow Targets to provide the correct return type? EVT RetVT = MVT::i32; // <-- here SDValue Ops[2] = { LHSInt, RHSInt }; NewLHS = MakeLibCall(LC1, RetVT, Ops, 2, false/*sign irrelevant*/, dl); NewRHS = DAG.getConstant(0, RetVT); CCCode = TLI.getCmpLibcallCC(LC1); I suggest to have a hook TLI.getCmpLibcallRT() on the lines of TLI.getCmpLibcallCC() Does that sound okay? - Sanjiv

..., a=..., ja=..., ia=..., ao=..., jao=..., iao=..., nnzdmax=1193, d=..., jd=..., id=..., dsub=..., jdsub=..., nsubmax=2615, lindx=..., xlindx=..., nnzlmax=197231, lnz=.. ., xlnz=..., invp=..., perm=..., iwmax=1410, iwork=..., colcnt=..., snode=..., xsuper=..., split=..., tm pmax=100244, tmpvec=..., newrhs=..., cachsz=64, level=8, x=..., s=..., u=..., c=..., y=..., b=..., r=... , z=..., w=..., q=..., nnzemax=1789, e=..., je=..., ie=..., dy=..., dx=..., ds=..., dz=..., dw=..., dxdz =..., dsdw=..., xi=..., xinv=..., sinv=..., ww1=..., ww2=..., small=9.9999999999999995e-07, ierr=0, maxi t=100, timewd=.....

...he return type of those libcalls is i32. > Why not allow Targets to provide the correct return type? > > EVT RetVT = MVT::i32; // <-- here > > > SDValue Ops[2] = { LHSInt, RHSInt }; > NewLHS = MakeLibCall(LC1, RetVT, Ops, 2, false/*sign irrelevant*/, dl); > NewRHS = DAG.getConstant(0, RetVT); > CCCode = TLI.getCmpLibcallCC(LC1); > > > I suggest to have a hook TLI.getCmpLibcallRT() on the lines of > TLI.getCmpLibcallCC() > > Does that sound okay? I think it should just use a scheme like GetFPLibCall. Ciao, Duncan.

Gurus: I have a new version of my quantreg package with minimal changes, mainly to fix some obscure fortran problems. It fails R CMD check ?as-cran with the error: Running examples in ?quantreg-Ex.R? failed The error most likely occurred in: > base::assign(".ptime", proc.time(), pos = "CheckExEnv") > ### Name: plot.rqss > ### Title: Plot Method for rqss Objects