search for: newoptions

Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "newoptions".

Did you mean: new_options
2010 Mar 18
3
problem of adding a new option of sshd
Dear all, I want to add a new option "newoption" to the sshd server, I have just add some codes in servconf.h and servconf.c like the other options. But it seems that the "newoption" can not be enable,when i set the "newoption" to "yes" in sshd_config file. I have add a debug message in main function of sshd.c .... debug("main sshd
2008 Jan 25
1
OpenSSH for OS/390
I have been trying to compile OpenSSH_4.7p1 for OS/390 and got really stuck. IBM released a build of v3.8.1p1 several years ago, but I do not know whether anyone else has ever managed to compile it for OS/390 or OS/z. The first problem is that the build apparently performs ssh transport exchange using EBCDIC character encoding instead of ASCII (which breaks RFC 4253) and I am not sure how to do
2007 Dec 20
1
Available environment variables
Hello, I am trying to set my environment to streamline the downloading / updating of packages. I have been through R-intro.html (10.8 Customizing-the-environment), R-FAQ (5.2 How can add-on packages be installed?), rw-FAQ, and help pages for Sys.setenv {base}, download.packages {utils}, etc.,. I am looking for something similar to the download.packages destdir argument on a global environment
2007 Jul 10
6
Having trouble using data returned by Ajax.request
...rHTML = graphData; } }, onFailure: function() { notice.update("hrm, something went wrong..."); } }); } And here is the code I''m using to try to load the data into the graph: function updateChart(chartName) { var newOptions = { padding: {left: 30, right: 0, top: 10, bottom: 30}, backgroundColor: ''#f2f2f2'', shouldFill: false, colorScheme: ''blue'', yNumberOfTicks: 2, xTicks: [ {v:5, label:''jan''}, ]...
2018 Aug 20
1
[PATCH] common/mltools: getopt: add Getopt.OptString
Introduce a new type of option with an optional string argument. --- common/mltools/getopt-c.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- common/mltools/getopt.ml | 5 ++++- common/mltools/getopt.mli | 4 ++++ common/mltools/getopt_tests.ml | 18 +++++++++++++++++- common/mltools/test-getopt.sh | 11 +++++++++++ 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git
2005 Sep 06
4
url_for: :overwrite_params went missing
Somewhere between 0.13.1 and the current SVN version the :overwrite_params option to url_for (and related methods) went missing. I can''t tell whether this was deliberate or by mistake, and I have no idea how to get the same functionality in some other way either. Michael -- Michael Schuerig Life is what happens
2018 Aug 21
0
[PATCH 1/2] common/mltools: getopt: add Getopt.OptString
Introduce a new type of option with an optional string argument. --- common/mltools/getopt-c.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++- common/mltools/getopt.ml | 5 ++++- common/mltools/getopt.mli | 4 ++++ common/mltools/getopt_tests.ml | 18 +++++++++++++++++- common/mltools/test-getopt.sh | 11 +++++++++++ 5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git
2018 Aug 21
4
[PATCH 0/2] RFC: add output selection for --machine-readable
Hi, this is a first approach (hence RFC, since it misses tests & documentation) in selecting the output for --machine-readable. The possible choices are: * --machine-readable: to stdout, like before * --machine-readable=file:name-of-file: to the specified file * --machine-readable=stream:stdout: explicitly to stdout * --machine-readable=stream:stderr: explicitly to stderr This makes it
2018 Aug 23
3
[PATCH v2 0/2] add output selection for --machine-readable
Hi, this adds the possibility to select the output for --machine-readable in OCaml tools. The possible choices are: * --machine-readable: to stdout, like before * --machine-readable=file:name-of-file: to the specified file * --machine-readable=stream:stdout: explicitly to stdout * --machine-readable=stream:stderr: explicitly to stderr This makes it possible to add additional output for
2016 Jun 24
2
[PATCH] RFC: OCaml tools: add and use a Getopt module
Add a new Getopt module to mllib, to parse command line arguments with handlers close to the ones used with Arg, but using getopt(3) (actually getopt_long_only) to do the real parsing. This allow us to provide options for OCaml tools with a syntax similar to the C tools, and use the additional features getopt offers and Arg does not. Do a single-step conversion of Common_utils and all the OCaml
2016 Jul 11
2
[PATCH v2] OCaml tools: add and use a Getopt module
Add a new Getopt module to mllib, to parse command line arguments with handlers close to the ones used with Arg, but using getopt(3) (actually getopt_long_only) to do the real parsing. This allow us to provide options for OCaml tools with a syntax similar to the C tools, and use the additional features getopt offers and Arg does not. Do a single-step conversion of Common_utils and all the OCaml
2016 Jul 13
3
[PATCH v3 1/2] OCaml tools: add and use a Getopt module
Add a new Getopt module to mllib, to parse command line arguments with handlers close to the ones used with Arg, but using getopt(3) (actually getopt_long_only) to do the real parsing. This allow us to provide options for OCaml tools with a syntax similar to the C tools, and use the additional features getopt offers and Arg does not. Getopt now handles every part of the command line handling,
2016 Jun 27
0
Re: [PATCH] RFC: OCaml tools: add and use a Getopt module
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 05:42:37PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > Add a new Getopt module to mllib, to parse command line arguments with > handlers close to the ones used with Arg, but using getopt(3) (actually > getopt_long_only) to do the real parsing. This allow us to provide > options for OCaml tools with a syntax similar to the C tools, and use > the additional features getopt