Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "newoptions".
Did you mean:
new_options
2010 Mar 18
3
problem of adding a new option of sshd
Dear all,
I want to add a new option "newoption" to the sshd server, I have just add some codes in servconf.h and
servconf.c like the other options. But it seems that the "newoption" can not be enable,when i set
the "newoption" to "yes" in sshd_config file. I have add a debug message in main function of sshd.c
....
debug("main sshd
2008 Jan 25
1
OpenSSH for OS/390
I have been trying to compile OpenSSH_4.7p1 for OS/390 and got really stuck. IBM released a build of v3.8.1p1 several years ago, but I do not know whether anyone else has ever managed to compile it for OS/390 or OS/z.
The first problem is that the build apparently performs ssh transport exchange using EBCDIC character encoding instead of ASCII (which breaks RFC 4253) and I am not sure how to do
2007 Dec 20
1
Available environment variables
Hello,
I am trying to set my environment to streamline the downloading /
updating of packages. I have been through R-intro.html (10.8
Customizing-the-environment), R-FAQ (5.2 How can add-on packages be
installed?), rw-FAQ, and help pages for Sys.setenv {base},
download.packages {utils}, etc.,.
I am looking for something similar to the download.packages destdir
argument on a global environment
2007 Jul 10
6
Having trouble using data returned by Ajax.request
...rHTML = graphData;
}
},
onFailure: function() {
notice.update("hrm, something went wrong...");
}
});
}
And here is the code I''m using to try to load the data into the graph:
function updateChart(chartName) {
var newOptions = {
padding: {left: 30, right: 0, top: 10, bottom: 30},
backgroundColor: ''#f2f2f2'',
shouldFill: false,
colorScheme: ''blue'',
yNumberOfTicks: 2,
xTicks: [
{v:5, label:''jan''},
]...
2018 Aug 20
1
[PATCH] common/mltools: getopt: add Getopt.OptString
Introduce a new type of option with an optional string argument.
---
common/mltools/getopt-c.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
common/mltools/getopt.ml | 5 ++++-
common/mltools/getopt.mli | 4 ++++
common/mltools/getopt_tests.ml | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
common/mltools/test-getopt.sh | 11 +++++++++++
5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
2005 Sep 06
4
url_for: :overwrite_params went missing
Somewhere between 0.13.1 and the current SVN version
the :overwrite_params option to url_for (and related methods) went
missing. I can''t tell whether this was deliberate or by mistake, and I
have no idea how to get the same functionality in some other way
either.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig Life is what happens
2018 Aug 21
0
[PATCH 1/2] common/mltools: getopt: add Getopt.OptString
Introduce a new type of option with an optional string argument.
---
common/mltools/getopt-c.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
common/mltools/getopt.ml | 5 ++++-
common/mltools/getopt.mli | 4 ++++
common/mltools/getopt_tests.ml | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
common/mltools/test-getopt.sh | 11 +++++++++++
5 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
2018 Aug 21
4
[PATCH 0/2] RFC: add output selection for --machine-readable
Hi,
this is a first approach (hence RFC, since it misses tests &
documentation) in selecting the output for --machine-readable.
The possible choices are:
* --machine-readable: to stdout, like before
* --machine-readable=file:name-of-file: to the specified file
* --machine-readable=stream:stdout: explicitly to stdout
* --machine-readable=stream:stderr: explicitly to stderr
This makes it
2018 Aug 23
3
[PATCH v2 0/2] add output selection for --machine-readable
Hi,
this adds the possibility to select the output for --machine-readable
in OCaml tools.
The possible choices are:
* --machine-readable: to stdout, like before
* --machine-readable=file:name-of-file: to the specified file
* --machine-readable=stream:stdout: explicitly to stdout
* --machine-readable=stream:stderr: explicitly to stderr
This makes it possible to add additional output for
2016 Jun 24
2
[PATCH] RFC: OCaml tools: add and use a Getopt module
Add a new Getopt module to mllib, to parse command line arguments with
handlers close to the ones used with Arg, but using getopt(3) (actually
getopt_long_only) to do the real parsing. This allow us to provide
options for OCaml tools with a syntax similar to the C tools, and use
the additional features getopt offers and Arg does not.
Do a single-step conversion of Common_utils and all the OCaml
2016 Jul 11
2
[PATCH v2] OCaml tools: add and use a Getopt module
Add a new Getopt module to mllib, to parse command line arguments with
handlers close to the ones used with Arg, but using getopt(3) (actually
getopt_long_only) to do the real parsing. This allow us to provide
options for OCaml tools with a syntax similar to the C tools, and use
the additional features getopt offers and Arg does not.
Do a single-step conversion of Common_utils and all the OCaml
2016 Jul 13
3
[PATCH v3 1/2] OCaml tools: add and use a Getopt module
Add a new Getopt module to mllib, to parse command line arguments with
handlers close to the ones used with Arg, but using getopt(3) (actually
getopt_long_only) to do the real parsing. This allow us to provide
options for OCaml tools with a syntax similar to the C tools, and use
the additional features getopt offers and Arg does not.
Getopt now handles every part of the command line handling,
2016 Jun 27
0
Re: [PATCH] RFC: OCaml tools: add and use a Getopt module
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 05:42:37PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Add a new Getopt module to mllib, to parse command line arguments with
> handlers close to the ones used with Arg, but using getopt(3) (actually
> getopt_long_only) to do the real parsing. This allow us to provide
> options for OCaml tools with a syntax similar to the C tools, and use
> the additional features getopt